{"title":"非缺血性扩张型心肌病患者中期心脏磁共振随访的预后价值:前瞻性队列研究","authors":"Yuanwei Xu, Yangjie Li, Shiqian Wang, Ke Wan, Yinxi Tan, Weihao Li, Jie Wang, Jiajun Guo, Saeed Ghaithan, Wei Cheng, Jiayu Sun, Qing Zhang, Yuchi Han, Yucheng Chen","doi":"10.1016/j.jocmr.2024.101002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The prognostic value of follow-up cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) in dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM) patients is unclear. We aimed to investigate the prognostic value of cardiac function, structure, and tissue characteristics at mid-term CMR follow-up.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The study population was a prospectively enrolled cohort of DCM patients who underwent guideline-directed medical therapy with baseline and follow-up CMR, which included measurement of biventricular volume and ejection fraction, late gadolinium enhancement, native T1, native T2, and extracellular volume. During follow-up, major adverse cardiac events (MACE) were defined as a composite endpoint of cardiovascular death, heart transplantation, and heart-failure readmission.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 235 DCM patients (median CMR interval: 15.3 months; interquartile range: 12.5-19.2 months), 54 (23.0%) experienced MACE during follow-up (median: 31.2 months; interquartile range: 20.8-50.0 months). In multivariable Cox regression, follow-up CMR models showed significantly superior predictive value than baseline CMR models. Stepwise multivariate Cox regression showed that follow-up left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF; hazard ratio [HR], 0.93; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.91-0.96; p < 0.001) and native T1 (HR, 1.01; 95% CI, 1.00-1.01; p = 0.030) were independent predictors of MACE. Follow-up LVEF ≥ 40% or stable LVEF < 40% with T1 ≤ 1273 ms indicated low risk (annual event rate < 4%), while stable LVEF < 40% and T1 > 1273 ms or LVEF < 40% with deterioration indicated high risk (annual event rate > 15%).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Follow-up CMR provided better risk stratification than baseline CMR. Improvements in the LVEF and T1 mapping are associated with a lower risk of MACE.</p>","PeriodicalId":15221,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10926272/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Prognostic value of mid-term cardiovascular magnetic resonance follow-up in patients with non-ischemic dilated cardiomyopathy: a prospective cohort study.\",\"authors\":\"Yuanwei Xu, Yangjie Li, Shiqian Wang, Ke Wan, Yinxi Tan, Weihao Li, Jie Wang, Jiajun Guo, Saeed Ghaithan, Wei Cheng, Jiayu Sun, Qing Zhang, Yuchi Han, Yucheng Chen\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jocmr.2024.101002\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The prognostic value of follow-up cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) in dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM) patients is unclear. We aimed to investigate the prognostic value of cardiac function, structure, and tissue characteristics at mid-term CMR follow-up.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The study population was a prospectively enrolled cohort of DCM patients who underwent guideline-directed medical therapy with baseline and follow-up CMR, which included measurement of biventricular volume and ejection fraction, late gadolinium enhancement, native T1, native T2, and extracellular volume. During follow-up, major adverse cardiac events (MACE) were defined as a composite endpoint of cardiovascular death, heart transplantation, and heart-failure readmission.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 235 DCM patients (median CMR interval: 15.3 months; interquartile range: 12.5-19.2 months), 54 (23.0%) experienced MACE during follow-up (median: 31.2 months; interquartile range: 20.8-50.0 months). In multivariable Cox regression, follow-up CMR models showed significantly superior predictive value than baseline CMR models. Stepwise multivariate Cox regression showed that follow-up left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF; hazard ratio [HR], 0.93; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.91-0.96; p < 0.001) and native T1 (HR, 1.01; 95% CI, 1.00-1.01; p = 0.030) were independent predictors of MACE. Follow-up LVEF ≥ 40% or stable LVEF < 40% with T1 ≤ 1273 ms indicated low risk (annual event rate < 4%), while stable LVEF < 40% and T1 > 1273 ms or LVEF < 40% with deterioration indicated high risk (annual event rate > 15%).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Follow-up CMR provided better risk stratification than baseline CMR. Improvements in the LVEF and T1 mapping are associated with a lower risk of MACE.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15221,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10926272/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jocmr.2024.101002\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/1/17 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jocmr.2024.101002","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/17 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
Prognostic value of mid-term cardiovascular magnetic resonance follow-up in patients with non-ischemic dilated cardiomyopathy: a prospective cohort study.
Background: The prognostic value of follow-up cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) in dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM) patients is unclear. We aimed to investigate the prognostic value of cardiac function, structure, and tissue characteristics at mid-term CMR follow-up.
Methods: The study population was a prospectively enrolled cohort of DCM patients who underwent guideline-directed medical therapy with baseline and follow-up CMR, which included measurement of biventricular volume and ejection fraction, late gadolinium enhancement, native T1, native T2, and extracellular volume. During follow-up, major adverse cardiac events (MACE) were defined as a composite endpoint of cardiovascular death, heart transplantation, and heart-failure readmission.
Results: Among 235 DCM patients (median CMR interval: 15.3 months; interquartile range: 12.5-19.2 months), 54 (23.0%) experienced MACE during follow-up (median: 31.2 months; interquartile range: 20.8-50.0 months). In multivariable Cox regression, follow-up CMR models showed significantly superior predictive value than baseline CMR models. Stepwise multivariate Cox regression showed that follow-up left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF; hazard ratio [HR], 0.93; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.91-0.96; p < 0.001) and native T1 (HR, 1.01; 95% CI, 1.00-1.01; p = 0.030) were independent predictors of MACE. Follow-up LVEF ≥ 40% or stable LVEF < 40% with T1 ≤ 1273 ms indicated low risk (annual event rate < 4%), while stable LVEF < 40% and T1 > 1273 ms or LVEF < 40% with deterioration indicated high risk (annual event rate > 15%).
Conclusions: Follow-up CMR provided better risk stratification than baseline CMR. Improvements in the LVEF and T1 mapping are associated with a lower risk of MACE.
期刊介绍:
Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance (JCMR) publishes high-quality articles on all aspects of basic, translational and clinical research on the design, development, manufacture, and evaluation of cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) methods applied to the cardiovascular system. Topical areas include, but are not limited to:
New applications of magnetic resonance to improve the diagnostic strategies, risk stratification, characterization and management of diseases affecting the cardiovascular system.
New methods to enhance or accelerate image acquisition and data analysis.
Results of multicenter, or larger single-center studies that provide insight into the utility of CMR.
Basic biological perceptions derived by CMR methods.