Mikhail Saltychev, Kristian Pylkäs, Aleksandra Karklins, Juhani Juhola
{"title":"颈部残疾指数的心理计量特性--系统回顾与荟萃分析。","authors":"Mikhail Saltychev, Kristian Pylkäs, Aleksandra Karklins, Juhani Juhola","doi":"10.1080/09638288.2024.2304644","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To evaluate the data on the psychometric properties of the Neck Disability Index (NDI).</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Medline, Embase, PsychINFO, Web of Science, and Scopus were searched in April 2023. The random effects meta-analysis was conducted when possible.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 492 identified records, 79 were included. 70 studies were considered to be of low risk of systematic bias. Alpha was >0.81. Pooled test-retest intraclass correlation coefficient was 0.91 (95% CI 0.90-0.93). The NDI correlations with pain rating scales varied from 0.38 to 0.89. 13 studies found the NDI to be unidimensional and 15 - two- or three-dimensional. The minimal detectable change varied from 3% to 27% and minimal clinically important difference from 5% to 33%. Pooled area under the curve was 0.74 (95% CI 0.68-0.80). Most studies have not detected floor or ceiling effect. Sex-related differential item functioning has been present in one study.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The NDI demonstrated good internal consistency and test-retest reliability without floor or ceiling effect. In most situations, the NDI could be considered a unidimensional scale. The NDI well correlated with the common scales of pain and disability. The minimal clinically important difference and minimal detectable change were around 15% (7.5/50 points).</p>","PeriodicalId":50575,"journal":{"name":"Disability and Rehabilitation","volume":" ","pages":"5415-5431"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Psychometric properties of neck disability index - a systematic review and meta-analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Mikhail Saltychev, Kristian Pylkäs, Aleksandra Karklins, Juhani Juhola\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/09638288.2024.2304644\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To evaluate the data on the psychometric properties of the Neck Disability Index (NDI).</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Medline, Embase, PsychINFO, Web of Science, and Scopus were searched in April 2023. The random effects meta-analysis was conducted when possible.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 492 identified records, 79 were included. 70 studies were considered to be of low risk of systematic bias. Alpha was >0.81. Pooled test-retest intraclass correlation coefficient was 0.91 (95% CI 0.90-0.93). The NDI correlations with pain rating scales varied from 0.38 to 0.89. 13 studies found the NDI to be unidimensional and 15 - two- or three-dimensional. The minimal detectable change varied from 3% to 27% and minimal clinically important difference from 5% to 33%. Pooled area under the curve was 0.74 (95% CI 0.68-0.80). Most studies have not detected floor or ceiling effect. Sex-related differential item functioning has been present in one study.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The NDI demonstrated good internal consistency and test-retest reliability without floor or ceiling effect. In most situations, the NDI could be considered a unidimensional scale. The NDI well correlated with the common scales of pain and disability. The minimal clinically important difference and minimal detectable change were around 15% (7.5/50 points).</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50575,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Disability and Rehabilitation\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"5415-5431\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Disability and Rehabilitation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/09638288.2024.2304644\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/1/19 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"REHABILITATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Disability and Rehabilitation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/09638288.2024.2304644","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/19 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
目的:评估颈部残疾指数(NDI)的心理测量特性数据:检索了 2023 年 4 月的 Medline、Embase、PsychINFO、Web of Science 和 Scopus。在可能的情况下进行了随机效应荟萃分析:结果:在已确定的 492 条记录中,有 79 条被纳入。70项研究被认为系统性偏倚风险较低。α值大于 0.81。综合测试-重复测试类内相关系数为 0.91 (95% CI 0.90-0.93)。NDI 与疼痛评分量表的相关性从 0.38 到 0.89 不等。13 项研究发现 NDI 是单维的,15 项研究发现 NDI 是二维或三维的。最小可检测到的变化从 3% 到 27% 不等,最小临床重要差异从 5% 到 33% 不等。汇总的曲线下面积为 0.74(95% CI 0.68-0.80)。大多数研究未发现最低或最高效应。一项研究中出现了与性别相关的项目功能差异:NDI显示出良好的内部一致性和测试-再测可靠性,没有最低或最高效应。在大多数情况下,NDI 可被视为单维度量表。NDI 与常见的疼痛和残疾量表有很好的相关性。最小临床重要差异和最小可检测到的变化约为 15%(7.5/50 分)。
Psychometric properties of neck disability index - a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Purpose: To evaluate the data on the psychometric properties of the Neck Disability Index (NDI).
Materials and methods: Medline, Embase, PsychINFO, Web of Science, and Scopus were searched in April 2023. The random effects meta-analysis was conducted when possible.
Results: Of 492 identified records, 79 were included. 70 studies were considered to be of low risk of systematic bias. Alpha was >0.81. Pooled test-retest intraclass correlation coefficient was 0.91 (95% CI 0.90-0.93). The NDI correlations with pain rating scales varied from 0.38 to 0.89. 13 studies found the NDI to be unidimensional and 15 - two- or three-dimensional. The minimal detectable change varied from 3% to 27% and minimal clinically important difference from 5% to 33%. Pooled area under the curve was 0.74 (95% CI 0.68-0.80). Most studies have not detected floor or ceiling effect. Sex-related differential item functioning has been present in one study.
Conclusions: The NDI demonstrated good internal consistency and test-retest reliability without floor or ceiling effect. In most situations, the NDI could be considered a unidimensional scale. The NDI well correlated with the common scales of pain and disability. The minimal clinically important difference and minimal detectable change were around 15% (7.5/50 points).
期刊介绍:
Disability and Rehabilitation along with Disability and Rehabilitation: Assistive Technology are international multidisciplinary journals which seek to encourage a better understanding of all aspects of disability and to promote rehabilitation science, practice and policy aspects of the rehabilitation process.