基于 PET/CT 的深度学习放射组学模型可预测非小细胞肺癌中 PD-L1 的表达情况

IF 1.8 Q3 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING European Journal of Radiology Open Pub Date : 2024-01-19 DOI:10.1016/j.ejro.2024.100549
Bo Li , Jie Su , Kai Liu, Chunfeng Hu
{"title":"基于 PET/CT 的深度学习放射组学模型可预测非小细胞肺癌中 PD-L1 的表达情况","authors":"Bo Li ,&nbsp;Jie Su ,&nbsp;Kai Liu,&nbsp;Chunfeng Hu","doi":"10.1016/j.ejro.2024.100549","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><p>Programmed cell death protein-1 ligand (PD-L1) is an important prognostic predictor for immunotherapy of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). This study aimed to develop a non-invasive deep learning and radiomics model based on positron emission tomography and computed tomography (PET/CT) to predict PD-L1 expression in NSCLC.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>A total of 136 patients with NSCLC between January 2021 and September 2022 were enrolled in this study. The patients were randomly divided into the training dataset and the validation dataset in a ratio of 7:3. Radiomics feature and deep learning feature were extracted from their PET/CT images. The Mann-whitney U-test, Least Absolute Shrinkage and Selection Operator algorithm and Spearman correlation analysis were used to select the top significant features. Then we developed a radiomics model, a deep learning model, and a fusion model based on the selected features. The performance of three models were compared by the area under the curve (AUC), sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Of the patients, 42 patients were PD-L1 negative and 94 patients were PD-L1 positive. A total of 2446 radiomics features and 4096 deep learning features were extracted per patient. In the training dataset, the fusion model achieved a highest AUC (0.954, 95% confident internal [CI]: 0.890–0.986) compared with the radiomics model (0.829, 95%CI: 0.738–0.898) and the deep learning model (0.935, 95%CI: 0.865–0.975). In the validation dataset, the AUC of the fusion model (0.910, 95% CI: 0.779–0.977) was also higher than that of the radiomics model (0.785, 95% CI: 0.628–0.897) and the deep learning model (0.867, 95% CI: 0.724–0.952).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>The PET/CT-based deep learning radiomics model can predict the PD-L1 expression accurately in NSCLC patients, and provides a non-invasive tool for clinicians to select positive PD-L1 patients.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":38076,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Radiology Open","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352047724000042/pdfft?md5=665b39078d34d10cc3d399f816e580ab&pid=1-s2.0-S2352047724000042-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Deep learning radiomics model based on PET/CT predicts PD-L1 expression in non-small cell lung cancer\",\"authors\":\"Bo Li ,&nbsp;Jie Su ,&nbsp;Kai Liu,&nbsp;Chunfeng Hu\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ejro.2024.100549\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><p>Programmed cell death protein-1 ligand (PD-L1) is an important prognostic predictor for immunotherapy of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). This study aimed to develop a non-invasive deep learning and radiomics model based on positron emission tomography and computed tomography (PET/CT) to predict PD-L1 expression in NSCLC.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>A total of 136 patients with NSCLC between January 2021 and September 2022 were enrolled in this study. The patients were randomly divided into the training dataset and the validation dataset in a ratio of 7:3. Radiomics feature and deep learning feature were extracted from their PET/CT images. The Mann-whitney U-test, Least Absolute Shrinkage and Selection Operator algorithm and Spearman correlation analysis were used to select the top significant features. Then we developed a radiomics model, a deep learning model, and a fusion model based on the selected features. The performance of three models were compared by the area under the curve (AUC), sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Of the patients, 42 patients were PD-L1 negative and 94 patients were PD-L1 positive. A total of 2446 radiomics features and 4096 deep learning features were extracted per patient. In the training dataset, the fusion model achieved a highest AUC (0.954, 95% confident internal [CI]: 0.890–0.986) compared with the radiomics model (0.829, 95%CI: 0.738–0.898) and the deep learning model (0.935, 95%CI: 0.865–0.975). In the validation dataset, the AUC of the fusion model (0.910, 95% CI: 0.779–0.977) was also higher than that of the radiomics model (0.785, 95% CI: 0.628–0.897) and the deep learning model (0.867, 95% CI: 0.724–0.952).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>The PET/CT-based deep learning radiomics model can predict the PD-L1 expression accurately in NSCLC patients, and provides a non-invasive tool for clinicians to select positive PD-L1 patients.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":38076,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European Journal of Radiology Open\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352047724000042/pdfft?md5=665b39078d34d10cc3d399f816e580ab&pid=1-s2.0-S2352047724000042-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European Journal of Radiology Open\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352047724000042\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Radiology Open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352047724000042","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的程序性细胞死亡蛋白-1配体(PD-L1)是非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)免疫疗法的重要预后预测指标。本研究旨在开发一种基于正电子发射断层扫描和计算机断层扫描(PET/CT)的无创深度学习和放射组学模型,以预测非小细胞肺癌中PD-L1的表达。这些患者按 7:3 的比例随机分为训练数据集和验证数据集。从患者的 PET/CT 图像中提取放射组学特征和深度学习特征。采用曼白尼 U 检验、最小绝对收缩和选择操作器算法以及斯皮尔曼相关分析来选择最重要的特征。然后,我们根据所选特征开发了放射组学模型、深度学习模型和融合模型。通过曲线下面积(AUC)、灵敏度、特异性、准确性、阳性预测值和阴性预测值比较了三种模型的性能。每位患者共提取了 2446 个放射组学特征和 4096 个深度学习特征。在训练数据集中,与放射组学模型(0.829,95%CI:0.738-0.898)和深度学习模型(0.935,95%CI:0.865-0.975)相比,融合模型的AUC最高(0.954,95%置信区间[CI]:0.890-0.986)。在验证数据集中,融合模型的 AUC(0.910,95%CI:0.779-0.977)也高于放射组学模型(0.785,95%CI:0.628-0.897)和深度学习模型(0.867,95%CI:0.结论基于PET/CT的深度学习放射组学模型可以准确预测NSCLC患者的PD-L1表达,为临床医生选择PD-L1阳性患者提供了一种无创工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Deep learning radiomics model based on PET/CT predicts PD-L1 expression in non-small cell lung cancer

Purpose

Programmed cell death protein-1 ligand (PD-L1) is an important prognostic predictor for immunotherapy of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). This study aimed to develop a non-invasive deep learning and radiomics model based on positron emission tomography and computed tomography (PET/CT) to predict PD-L1 expression in NSCLC.

Methods

A total of 136 patients with NSCLC between January 2021 and September 2022 were enrolled in this study. The patients were randomly divided into the training dataset and the validation dataset in a ratio of 7:3. Radiomics feature and deep learning feature were extracted from their PET/CT images. The Mann-whitney U-test, Least Absolute Shrinkage and Selection Operator algorithm and Spearman correlation analysis were used to select the top significant features. Then we developed a radiomics model, a deep learning model, and a fusion model based on the selected features. The performance of three models were compared by the area under the curve (AUC), sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value.

Results

Of the patients, 42 patients were PD-L1 negative and 94 patients were PD-L1 positive. A total of 2446 radiomics features and 4096 deep learning features were extracted per patient. In the training dataset, the fusion model achieved a highest AUC (0.954, 95% confident internal [CI]: 0.890–0.986) compared with the radiomics model (0.829, 95%CI: 0.738–0.898) and the deep learning model (0.935, 95%CI: 0.865–0.975). In the validation dataset, the AUC of the fusion model (0.910, 95% CI: 0.779–0.977) was also higher than that of the radiomics model (0.785, 95% CI: 0.628–0.897) and the deep learning model (0.867, 95% CI: 0.724–0.952).

Conclusion

The PET/CT-based deep learning radiomics model can predict the PD-L1 expression accurately in NSCLC patients, and provides a non-invasive tool for clinicians to select positive PD-L1 patients.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
European Journal of Radiology Open
European Journal of Radiology Open Medicine-Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
5.00%
发文量
55
审稿时长
51 days
期刊最新文献
Deep learning model for diagnosis of thyroid nodules with size less than 1 cm: A multicenter, retrospective study MRI-based radiomics machine learning model to differentiate non-clear cell renal cell carcinoma from benign renal tumors Post-deployment performance of a deep learning algorithm for normal and abnormal chest X-ray classification: A study at visa screening centers in the United Arab Emirates Study on the classification of benign and malignant breast lesions using a multi-sequence breast MRI fusion radiomics and deep learning model True cost estimation of common imaging procedures for cost-effectiveness analysis - insights from a Singapore hospital emergency department
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1