最优动态治疗制度估算的差异化私人结果加权学习

IF 0.7 4区 数学 Q3 STATISTICS & PROBABILITY Stat Pub Date : 2024-01-17 DOI:10.1002/sta4.641
Dylan Spicker, Erica E. M. Moodie, Susan M. Shortreed
{"title":"最优动态治疗制度估算的差异化私人结果加权学习","authors":"Dylan Spicker, Erica E. M. Moodie, Susan M. Shortreed","doi":"10.1002/sta4.641","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Precision medicine is a framework for developing evidence-based medical recommendations that seeks to determine the optimal sequence of treatments, tailored to all of the relevant, observable patient-level characteristics. Because precision medicine relies on highly sensitive, patient-level data, ensuring the privacy of participants is of great importance. Dynamic treatment regimes (DTRs) provide one formalization of precision medicine in a longitudinal setting. Outcome-weighted learning (OWL) is a family of techniques for estimating optimal DTRs based on observational data. OWL techniques leverage support vector machine (SVM) classifiers in order to perform estimation. SVMs perform classification based on a set of influential points in the data known as support vectors. The classification rule produced by SVMs often requires direct access to the support vectors. Thus, releasing a treatment policy estimated with OWL requires the release of patient data for a subset of patients in the sample. As a result, the classification rules from SVMs constitute a severe privacy violation for those individuals whose data comprise the support vectors. This privacy violation is a major concern, particularly in light of the potentially highly sensitive medical data that are used in DTR estimation. Differential privacy has emerged as a mathematical framework for ensuring the privacy of individual-level data, with provable guarantees on the likelihood that individual characteristics can be determined by an adversary. We provide the first investigation of differential privacy in the context of DTRs and provide a differentially private OWL estimator, with theoretical results allowing us to quantify the cost of privacy in terms of the accuracy of the private estimators.","PeriodicalId":56159,"journal":{"name":"Stat","volume":"12 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Differentially private outcome-weighted learning for optimal dynamic treatment regime estimation\",\"authors\":\"Dylan Spicker, Erica E. M. Moodie, Susan M. Shortreed\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/sta4.641\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Precision medicine is a framework for developing evidence-based medical recommendations that seeks to determine the optimal sequence of treatments, tailored to all of the relevant, observable patient-level characteristics. Because precision medicine relies on highly sensitive, patient-level data, ensuring the privacy of participants is of great importance. Dynamic treatment regimes (DTRs) provide one formalization of precision medicine in a longitudinal setting. Outcome-weighted learning (OWL) is a family of techniques for estimating optimal DTRs based on observational data. OWL techniques leverage support vector machine (SVM) classifiers in order to perform estimation. SVMs perform classification based on a set of influential points in the data known as support vectors. The classification rule produced by SVMs often requires direct access to the support vectors. Thus, releasing a treatment policy estimated with OWL requires the release of patient data for a subset of patients in the sample. As a result, the classification rules from SVMs constitute a severe privacy violation for those individuals whose data comprise the support vectors. This privacy violation is a major concern, particularly in light of the potentially highly sensitive medical data that are used in DTR estimation. Differential privacy has emerged as a mathematical framework for ensuring the privacy of individual-level data, with provable guarantees on the likelihood that individual characteristics can be determined by an adversary. We provide the first investigation of differential privacy in the context of DTRs and provide a differentially private OWL estimator, with theoretical results allowing us to quantify the cost of privacy in terms of the accuracy of the private estimators.\",\"PeriodicalId\":56159,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Stat\",\"volume\":\"12 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Stat\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"100\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/sta4.641\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"数学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"STATISTICS & PROBABILITY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Stat","FirstCategoryId":"100","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/sta4.641","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"数学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"STATISTICS & PROBABILITY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

精准医疗是一种制定循证医疗建议的框架,旨在根据所有相关的、可观察到的患者水平特征,确定最佳的治疗顺序。由于精准医疗依赖于高度敏感的患者级数据,因此确保参与者的隐私非常重要。动态治疗机制(DTR)是纵向精准医疗的一种形式化。结果加权学习(OWL)是基于观察数据估算最佳动态治疗方案的一系列技术。OWL 技术利用支持向量机(SVM)分类器进行估算。SVM 基于数据中一组有影响力的点进行分类,这些点被称为支持向量。SVM 生成的分类规则通常需要直接访问支持向量。因此,发布使用 OWL 估算的治疗策略需要发布样本中一部分患者的数据。因此,SVM 的分类规则严重侵犯了支持向量所包含的个人隐私。这种隐私侵犯是一个重大问题,特别是考虑到 DTR 估算中使用的医疗数据可能具有高度敏感性。差分隐私已成为确保个人数据隐私的数学框架,可证明对手确定个人特征的可能性。我们首次在 DTR 的背景下对差分隐私进行了研究,并提供了一种差分隐私 OWL 估算器,其理论结果使我们能够以隐私估算器的准确性来量化隐私成本。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Differentially private outcome-weighted learning for optimal dynamic treatment regime estimation
Precision medicine is a framework for developing evidence-based medical recommendations that seeks to determine the optimal sequence of treatments, tailored to all of the relevant, observable patient-level characteristics. Because precision medicine relies on highly sensitive, patient-level data, ensuring the privacy of participants is of great importance. Dynamic treatment regimes (DTRs) provide one formalization of precision medicine in a longitudinal setting. Outcome-weighted learning (OWL) is a family of techniques for estimating optimal DTRs based on observational data. OWL techniques leverage support vector machine (SVM) classifiers in order to perform estimation. SVMs perform classification based on a set of influential points in the data known as support vectors. The classification rule produced by SVMs often requires direct access to the support vectors. Thus, releasing a treatment policy estimated with OWL requires the release of patient data for a subset of patients in the sample. As a result, the classification rules from SVMs constitute a severe privacy violation for those individuals whose data comprise the support vectors. This privacy violation is a major concern, particularly in light of the potentially highly sensitive medical data that are used in DTR estimation. Differential privacy has emerged as a mathematical framework for ensuring the privacy of individual-level data, with provable guarantees on the likelihood that individual characteristics can be determined by an adversary. We provide the first investigation of differential privacy in the context of DTRs and provide a differentially private OWL estimator, with theoretical results allowing us to quantify the cost of privacy in terms of the accuracy of the private estimators.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Stat
Stat Decision Sciences-Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
85
期刊介绍: Stat is an innovative electronic journal for the rapid publication of novel and topical research results, publishing compact articles of the highest quality in all areas of statistical endeavour. Its purpose is to provide a means of rapid sharing of important new theoretical, methodological and applied research. Stat is a joint venture between the International Statistical Institute and Wiley-Blackwell. Stat is characterised by: • Speed - a high-quality review process that aims to reach a decision within 20 days of submission. • Concision - a maximum article length of 10 pages of text, not including references. • Supporting materials - inclusion of electronic supporting materials including graphs, video, software, data and images. • Scope - addresses all areas of statistics and interdisciplinary areas. Stat is a scientific journal for the international community of statisticians and researchers and practitioners in allied quantitative disciplines.
期刊最新文献
Communication‐Efficient Distributed Estimation of Causal Effects With High‐Dimensional Data A Joint Temporal Model for Hospitalizations and ICU Admissions Due to COVID‐19 in Quebec Bitcoin Price Prediction Using Deep Bayesian LSTM With Uncertainty Quantification: A Monte Carlo Dropout–Based Approach Exact interval estimation for three parameters subject to false positive misclassification Novel Closed‐Form Point Estimators for a Weighted Exponential Family Derived From Likelihood Equations
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1