不能简单地 "灵活":调节控制参数需要学习

IF 4.9 2区 心理学 Q1 BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences Pub Date : 2024-01-19 DOI:10.1016/j.cobeha.2023.101347
Senne Braem , Mengqiao Chai , Leslie K Held , Shengjie Xu
{"title":"不能简单地 \"灵活\":调节控制参数需要学习","authors":"Senne Braem ,&nbsp;Mengqiao Chai ,&nbsp;Leslie K Held ,&nbsp;Shengjie Xu","doi":"10.1016/j.cobeha.2023.101347","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Humans are remarkably efficient at being on task, and flexibly switching back and forth between different tasks. The degree to which they focus on a task, or the extent to which they remain open for switching between tasks, are often considered ‘control parameters’ that are thought to be under parametric control. Theories on cognitive control often assume that people can readily up- or downregulate these control parameters that determine the degree of task focus or switch readiness. Here, we review evidence suggesting that humans are rather inefficient at this parametric regulation of control, as if ‘turning a knob,’ through explicit cues alone. Instead, our research highlights the role of task experience, training, and reward contingencies to cultivate flexible, dynamic adaptations in control parameters.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":56191,"journal":{"name":"Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences","volume":"55 ","pages":"Article 101347"},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"One cannot simply 'be flexible’: regulating control parameters requires learning\",\"authors\":\"Senne Braem ,&nbsp;Mengqiao Chai ,&nbsp;Leslie K Held ,&nbsp;Shengjie Xu\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.cobeha.2023.101347\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Humans are remarkably efficient at being on task, and flexibly switching back and forth between different tasks. The degree to which they focus on a task, or the extent to which they remain open for switching between tasks, are often considered ‘control parameters’ that are thought to be under parametric control. Theories on cognitive control often assume that people can readily up- or downregulate these control parameters that determine the degree of task focus or switch readiness. Here, we review evidence suggesting that humans are rather inefficient at this parametric regulation of control, as if ‘turning a knob,’ through explicit cues alone. Instead, our research highlights the role of task experience, training, and reward contingencies to cultivate flexible, dynamic adaptations in control parameters.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":56191,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences\",\"volume\":\"55 \",\"pages\":\"Article 101347\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352154623001018\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352154623001018","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

人类在执行任务和在不同任务之间灵活切换时效率极高。他们专注于某项任务的程度,或在不同任务之间保持开放切换的程度,通常被认为是受参数控制的 "控制参数"。认知控制理论通常认为,人们可以随时上调或下调这些决定任务专注程度或切换准备程度的控制参数。在这里,我们回顾了一些证据,这些证据表明,人类在这种参数控制调节方面的效率很低,就好像仅仅通过明确的提示来 "转动旋钮 "一样。相反,我们的研究强调了任务经验、训练和奖励应急措施在培养控制参数的灵活、动态适应性方面的作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
One cannot simply 'be flexible’: regulating control parameters requires learning

Humans are remarkably efficient at being on task, and flexibly switching back and forth between different tasks. The degree to which they focus on a task, or the extent to which they remain open for switching between tasks, are often considered ‘control parameters’ that are thought to be under parametric control. Theories on cognitive control often assume that people can readily up- or downregulate these control parameters that determine the degree of task focus or switch readiness. Here, we review evidence suggesting that humans are rather inefficient at this parametric regulation of control, as if ‘turning a knob,’ through explicit cues alone. Instead, our research highlights the role of task experience, training, and reward contingencies to cultivate flexible, dynamic adaptations in control parameters.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences
Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences Neuroscience-Cognitive Neuroscience
CiteScore
10.90
自引率
2.00%
发文量
135
期刊介绍: Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences is a systematic, integrative review journal that provides a unique and educational platform for updates on the expanding volume of information published in the field of behavioral sciences.
期刊最新文献
A light at the end of the axon: genetically encoded fluorescent indicators shine light on the dopamine system Dopaminergic computations for perceptual decisions From sensory motor and perceptual development to primary consciousness in the fetus: converging neural, behavioral, and imaging correlates of cognition-mediated emergent transitions Nonsynaptic encoding of behavior by neuropeptides Stress-free indulgence: indulge adaptively to promote goal pursuit and well-being
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1