生物能源在巴西低碳未来中的作用

IF 5.8 Q2 ENERGY & FUELS Energy and climate change Pub Date : 2023-12-27 DOI:10.1016/j.egycc.2023.100123
Matheus Poggio , Mariana Império , Luiz Bernardo Baptista , Roberto Schaeffer , André F.P. Lucena , Alexandre Szklo , Pedro R.R. Rochedo , Nathan Hultman , Haewon McJeon , Leon Clarke
{"title":"生物能源在巴西低碳未来中的作用","authors":"Matheus Poggio ,&nbsp;Mariana Império ,&nbsp;Luiz Bernardo Baptista ,&nbsp;Roberto Schaeffer ,&nbsp;André F.P. Lucena ,&nbsp;Alexandre Szklo ,&nbsp;Pedro R.R. Rochedo ,&nbsp;Nathan Hultman ,&nbsp;Haewon McJeon ,&nbsp;Leon Clarke","doi":"10.1016/j.egycc.2023.100123","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p><span>The urgency of climate change requires a clear understanding of how global technological trends can alter a country's least-cost, low-carbon strategy (net-zero), considering its own advantages in terms of resources, existing knowledge, and energy facilities and converters. This study compares Brazil's least-cost strategies to reach net zero CO</span><sub>2</sub> emissions by 2050 with strategies based on the technological development patterns suggested by the most recent International Energy Agency's (IEA) net zero report, which are assumed to represent global trends in technology deployment for climate mitigation. Our study is based on the use of an Integrated Assessment Model (IAM) for Brazil. Four different mitigation scenarios are explored. Results show that the IEA technological profile deeply differs from a non-constrained technological deployment for Brazil, particularly in terms of the liquid fuels mix and the time of implementation of electric-driven mobility. In Brazil, biofuels use stand out as the least-cost solution to reach net zero emissions by 2050, mostly due to the use of bioenergy with carbon capture and storage (BECCS), which can slow down fossil fuel phase out in the country. Nevertheless, a hybrid strategy can include the use of ethanol or even hydrogen fuel cells in electric powertrains, though this would require further research and development.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":72914,"journal":{"name":"Energy and climate change","volume":"5 ","pages":"Article 100123"},"PeriodicalIF":5.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The role of bioenergy in Brazil's low-carbon future\",\"authors\":\"Matheus Poggio ,&nbsp;Mariana Império ,&nbsp;Luiz Bernardo Baptista ,&nbsp;Roberto Schaeffer ,&nbsp;André F.P. Lucena ,&nbsp;Alexandre Szklo ,&nbsp;Pedro R.R. Rochedo ,&nbsp;Nathan Hultman ,&nbsp;Haewon McJeon ,&nbsp;Leon Clarke\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.egycc.2023.100123\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p><span>The urgency of climate change requires a clear understanding of how global technological trends can alter a country's least-cost, low-carbon strategy (net-zero), considering its own advantages in terms of resources, existing knowledge, and energy facilities and converters. This study compares Brazil's least-cost strategies to reach net zero CO</span><sub>2</sub> emissions by 2050 with strategies based on the technological development patterns suggested by the most recent International Energy Agency's (IEA) net zero report, which are assumed to represent global trends in technology deployment for climate mitigation. Our study is based on the use of an Integrated Assessment Model (IAM) for Brazil. Four different mitigation scenarios are explored. Results show that the IEA technological profile deeply differs from a non-constrained technological deployment for Brazil, particularly in terms of the liquid fuels mix and the time of implementation of electric-driven mobility. In Brazil, biofuels use stand out as the least-cost solution to reach net zero emissions by 2050, mostly due to the use of bioenergy with carbon capture and storage (BECCS), which can slow down fossil fuel phase out in the country. Nevertheless, a hybrid strategy can include the use of ethanol or even hydrogen fuel cells in electric powertrains, though this would require further research and development.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":72914,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Energy and climate change\",\"volume\":\"5 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100123\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-12-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Energy and climate change\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666278723000302\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ENERGY & FUELS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Energy and climate change","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666278723000302","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENERGY & FUELS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

气候变化的紧迫性要求我们清楚地认识到,考虑到一国在资源、现有知识、能源设施和转换器方面的优势,全球技术趋势会如何改变该国成本最低的低碳战略(净零排放)。本研究将巴西到 2050 年实现二氧化碳净零排放的最低成本战略与基于国际能源机构(IEA)最新净零排放报告所建议的技术发展模式的战略进行了比较,假定后者代表了全球气候减缓技术部署的趋势。我们的研究以巴西综合评估模型(IAM)为基础。研究探讨了四种不同的减排方案。结果表明,IEA 的技术概况与巴西的无约束技术部署有很大不同,特别是在液体燃料组合和电动交通的实施时间方面。在巴西,生物燃料的使用是到 2050 年实现净零排放的成本最低的解决方案,这主要是由于生物能源与碳捕集与封存(BECCS)的使用可以减缓化石燃料在巴西的淘汰速度。不过,混合战略可以包括在电动动力系统中使用乙醇甚至氢燃料电池,但这需要进一步的研究和开发。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The role of bioenergy in Brazil's low-carbon future

The urgency of climate change requires a clear understanding of how global technological trends can alter a country's least-cost, low-carbon strategy (net-zero), considering its own advantages in terms of resources, existing knowledge, and energy facilities and converters. This study compares Brazil's least-cost strategies to reach net zero CO2 emissions by 2050 with strategies based on the technological development patterns suggested by the most recent International Energy Agency's (IEA) net zero report, which are assumed to represent global trends in technology deployment for climate mitigation. Our study is based on the use of an Integrated Assessment Model (IAM) for Brazil. Four different mitigation scenarios are explored. Results show that the IEA technological profile deeply differs from a non-constrained technological deployment for Brazil, particularly in terms of the liquid fuels mix and the time of implementation of electric-driven mobility. In Brazil, biofuels use stand out as the least-cost solution to reach net zero emissions by 2050, mostly due to the use of bioenergy with carbon capture and storage (BECCS), which can slow down fossil fuel phase out in the country. Nevertheless, a hybrid strategy can include the use of ethanol or even hydrogen fuel cells in electric powertrains, though this would require further research and development.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Energy and climate change
Energy and climate change Global and Planetary Change, Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment, Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law
CiteScore
7.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Solar assisted generation of plasmonic silver photocatalyst for wastewater remediation and green hydrogen production Green hydrogen production via a photocatalyst-enabled optical fiber system: A promising route to net-zero emissions Stranded assets and compensation in oil and gas upstream projects: Conceptual and practical issues Welfare and inequality impacts of carbon pricing and compensation schemes on fuel poor households in Styria, Austria Perspectives of electrochemical and photocatalytic technologies for the water-energy nexus potential of water splitting of brines
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1