用于 DNA 检测的最佳骨骼元素:对常规法医实践中不同类型骨骼的 DNA 数量和质量进行评估

IF 1.3 4区 医学 Q3 MEDICINE, LEGAL Legal Medicine Pub Date : 2024-01-19 DOI:10.1016/j.legalmed.2024.102415
Tomomi Otagiri, Noriko Sato, Tetsuya Shiozaki, Yuta Harayama, Momoe Matsumoto, Kanya Kobayashi, Hideki Asamura
{"title":"用于 DNA 检测的最佳骨骼元素:对常规法医实践中不同类型骨骼的 DNA 数量和质量进行评估","authors":"Tomomi Otagiri,&nbsp;Noriko Sato,&nbsp;Tetsuya Shiozaki,&nbsp;Yuta Harayama,&nbsp;Momoe Matsumoto,&nbsp;Kanya Kobayashi,&nbsp;Hideki Asamura","doi":"10.1016/j.legalmed.2024.102415","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>For human identification, the quality and quantity of DNA must be sufficient for amplification and analysis. When DNA extraction from bone tissues and teeth is required, the optimal skeletal elements should be selected as samples for DNA extraction because DNA yield differs among elements. Recently, some studies have reported that a high quantity of high-quality DNA can be extracted from the small cancellous bones of the hands and feet. In this study, we evaluated the effectiveness of small cancellous bones in the human identification of skeletal remains in routine forensic genetic casework. Cancellous bones [phalanges, (meta)carpal bones, and (meta)tarsal bones)] and the cortical bones (femur and petrous bones) and teeth, which have generally been recommended as samples, were collected from the same individuals that needed identifying using DNA analysis in our laboratory. The quantity of DNA from small cancellous bones tended to be higher than that from cortical bones, and the quality from the former was as high as that from the latter. This study showed that in routine forensic casework, the small cancellous bones of the hands and feet should be actively selected as samples for DNA testing.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":49913,"journal":{"name":"Legal Medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1344622324000257/pdfft?md5=891ecce5552656a478056f273a64e694&pid=1-s2.0-S1344622324000257-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"An optimal skeletal element for DNA testing: Evaluation of DNA quantity and quality from various bone types in routine forensic practice\",\"authors\":\"Tomomi Otagiri,&nbsp;Noriko Sato,&nbsp;Tetsuya Shiozaki,&nbsp;Yuta Harayama,&nbsp;Momoe Matsumoto,&nbsp;Kanya Kobayashi,&nbsp;Hideki Asamura\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.legalmed.2024.102415\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>For human identification, the quality and quantity of DNA must be sufficient for amplification and analysis. When DNA extraction from bone tissues and teeth is required, the optimal skeletal elements should be selected as samples for DNA extraction because DNA yield differs among elements. Recently, some studies have reported that a high quantity of high-quality DNA can be extracted from the small cancellous bones of the hands and feet. In this study, we evaluated the effectiveness of small cancellous bones in the human identification of skeletal remains in routine forensic genetic casework. Cancellous bones [phalanges, (meta)carpal bones, and (meta)tarsal bones)] and the cortical bones (femur and petrous bones) and teeth, which have generally been recommended as samples, were collected from the same individuals that needed identifying using DNA analysis in our laboratory. The quantity of DNA from small cancellous bones tended to be higher than that from cortical bones, and the quality from the former was as high as that from the latter. This study showed that in routine forensic casework, the small cancellous bones of the hands and feet should be actively selected as samples for DNA testing.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49913,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Legal Medicine\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1344622324000257/pdfft?md5=891ecce5552656a478056f273a64e694&pid=1-s2.0-S1344622324000257-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Legal Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1344622324000257\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, LEGAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Legal Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1344622324000257","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICINE, LEGAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

要进行人体鉴定,DNA 的质量和数量必须足以进行扩增和分析。当需要从骨组织和牙齿中提取 DNA 时,应选择最佳的骨骼元素作为 DNA 提取样本,因为不同元素的 DNA 产量不同。最近,一些研究报告称,可以从手部和足部的小松质骨中提取大量高质量的 DNA。在本研究中,我们评估了在常规法医基因案件工作中,小块松质骨在遗骸人体鉴定中的有效性。我们的实验室从需要进行 DNA 分析鉴定的同一个人身上采集了松质骨(指骨、(元)腕骨和(元)跗骨)]和皮质骨(股骨和石质骨)以及牙齿,这些通常被推荐作为样本。小块松质骨的 DNA 数量往往高于皮质骨,而前者的质量也不亚于后者。这项研究表明,在日常法医案件工作中,应积极选择手部和足部的小块松质骨作为 DNA 检测样本。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
An optimal skeletal element for DNA testing: Evaluation of DNA quantity and quality from various bone types in routine forensic practice

For human identification, the quality and quantity of DNA must be sufficient for amplification and analysis. When DNA extraction from bone tissues and teeth is required, the optimal skeletal elements should be selected as samples for DNA extraction because DNA yield differs among elements. Recently, some studies have reported that a high quantity of high-quality DNA can be extracted from the small cancellous bones of the hands and feet. In this study, we evaluated the effectiveness of small cancellous bones in the human identification of skeletal remains in routine forensic genetic casework. Cancellous bones [phalanges, (meta)carpal bones, and (meta)tarsal bones)] and the cortical bones (femur and petrous bones) and teeth, which have generally been recommended as samples, were collected from the same individuals that needed identifying using DNA analysis in our laboratory. The quantity of DNA from small cancellous bones tended to be higher than that from cortical bones, and the quality from the former was as high as that from the latter. This study showed that in routine forensic casework, the small cancellous bones of the hands and feet should be actively selected as samples for DNA testing.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Legal Medicine
Legal Medicine Nursing-Issues, Ethics and Legal Aspects
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
6.70%
发文量
119
审稿时长
7.9 weeks
期刊介绍: Legal Medicine provides an international forum for the publication of original articles, reviews and correspondence on subjects that cover practical and theoretical areas of interest relating to the wide range of legal medicine. Subjects covered include forensic pathology, toxicology, odontology, anthropology, criminalistics, immunochemistry, hemogenetics and forensic aspects of biological science with emphasis on DNA analysis and molecular biology. Submissions dealing with medicolegal problems such as malpractice, insurance, child abuse or ethics in medical practice are also acceptable.
期刊最新文献
Complete aortic rupture following wakeboarding accident Evaluation of two scoring systems assessing the epiphyseal union at shoulder joint as predictors of chronological age among a sample of Egyptians Research progress and application of the third-generation sequencing technologies in forensic medicine Forensic and ecological significance of necrophagous insects: Insights from animal carcasses, human cadavers, and myiasis patients Exploring health professionals’ knowledge of end of life in Italy
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1