中子源发射率测量的国际比较(2016-2021 年)--CCRI(III)-K9.Cf.2016

IF 2.1 3区 工程技术 Q2 INSTRUMENTS & INSTRUMENTATION Metrologia Pub Date : 2024-01-19 DOI:10.1088/0026-1394/61/1a/06001
N J Roberts, N A Horwood, Z Vykydal, H Park, J Kim, W W Pereira, E S da Fonseca, C Thiam, Zhang Hui, M S Dewey, H P Mumm, H Harano, T Matsumoto, A Masuda, S Manabe, J P Archambault, N N Moiseev, A V Didyk
{"title":"中子源发射率测量的国际比较(2016-2021 年)--CCRI(III)-K9.Cf.2016","authors":"N J Roberts, N A Horwood, Z Vykydal, H Park, J Kim, W W Pereira, E S da Fonseca, C Thiam, Zhang Hui, M S Dewey, H P Mumm, H Harano, T Matsumoto, A Masuda, S Manabe, J P Archambault, N N Moiseev, A V Didyk","doi":"10.1088/0026-1394/61/1a/06001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<title>Main text</title>Section III (neutron measurements) of the Comité Consultatif des Rayonnements Ionisants, CCRI, conducted a comparison of primary measurements of the neutron emission rate of a <sup>252</sup>Cf radionuclide source. A single <sup>252</sup>Cf source was circulated to all participants between 2016 and 2020. Ten laboratories participated -CMI (Czech Republic), KRISS (Republic of Korea), IRD/LNMRI (Brazil), LNE-LNHB (France), NIM (China), NIST (USA), NMIJ (Japan), NPL (UK), NRC (Canada) and VNIIM (Russia) - with NPL making their measurements at the start and repeating them at the end of the exercise to verify the <sup>250</sup>Cf content of the source. Each laboratory reported the emission rate into 4π sr together with a detailed uncertainty budget. All participants used the manganese bath technique except NMIJ who used a relative method based on measurements with a <sup>3</sup>He detector in a graphite pile. VNIIM also made measurements using an associated particle technique. CMI, KRISS, LNE-LNHB, NIM, NPL and VNIIM also measured the anisotropy of the source although this did not formally form part of the comparison.To reach the main text of this paper, click on <ext-link xlink:href=\"https://www.bipm.org/documents/d/guest/ccri-iii-k9-cf-252-2016\" xlink:type=\"simple\">Final Report</ext-link>. Note that this text is that which appears in Appendix B of the BIPM key comparison database <ext-link xlink:href=\"https://www.bipm.org/kcdb/\" xlink:type=\"simple\">https://www.bipm.org/kcdb/</ext-link>.The final report has been peer-reviewed and approved for publication by the CCRI, according to the provisions of the CIPM Mutual Recognition Arrangement (CIPM MRA).","PeriodicalId":18444,"journal":{"name":"Metrologia","volume":"16 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"International comparison of measurements of neutron source emission rate (2016-2021) - CCRI(III)-K9.Cf.2016\",\"authors\":\"N J Roberts, N A Horwood, Z Vykydal, H Park, J Kim, W W Pereira, E S da Fonseca, C Thiam, Zhang Hui, M S Dewey, H P Mumm, H Harano, T Matsumoto, A Masuda, S Manabe, J P Archambault, N N Moiseev, A V Didyk\",\"doi\":\"10.1088/0026-1394/61/1a/06001\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<title>Main text</title>Section III (neutron measurements) of the Comité Consultatif des Rayonnements Ionisants, CCRI, conducted a comparison of primary measurements of the neutron emission rate of a <sup>252</sup>Cf radionuclide source. A single <sup>252</sup>Cf source was circulated to all participants between 2016 and 2020. Ten laboratories participated -CMI (Czech Republic), KRISS (Republic of Korea), IRD/LNMRI (Brazil), LNE-LNHB (France), NIM (China), NIST (USA), NMIJ (Japan), NPL (UK), NRC (Canada) and VNIIM (Russia) - with NPL making their measurements at the start and repeating them at the end of the exercise to verify the <sup>250</sup>Cf content of the source. Each laboratory reported the emission rate into 4π sr together with a detailed uncertainty budget. All participants used the manganese bath technique except NMIJ who used a relative method based on measurements with a <sup>3</sup>He detector in a graphite pile. VNIIM also made measurements using an associated particle technique. CMI, KRISS, LNE-LNHB, NIM, NPL and VNIIM also measured the anisotropy of the source although this did not formally form part of the comparison.To reach the main text of this paper, click on <ext-link xlink:href=\\\"https://www.bipm.org/documents/d/guest/ccri-iii-k9-cf-252-2016\\\" xlink:type=\\\"simple\\\">Final Report</ext-link>. Note that this text is that which appears in Appendix B of the BIPM key comparison database <ext-link xlink:href=\\\"https://www.bipm.org/kcdb/\\\" xlink:type=\\\"simple\\\">https://www.bipm.org/kcdb/</ext-link>.The final report has been peer-reviewed and approved for publication by the CCRI, according to the provisions of the CIPM Mutual Recognition Arrangement (CIPM MRA).\",\"PeriodicalId\":18444,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Metrologia\",\"volume\":\"16 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Metrologia\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1088/0026-1394/61/1a/06001\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"INSTRUMENTS & INSTRUMENTATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Metrologia","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1088/0026-1394/61/1a/06001","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"INSTRUMENTS & INSTRUMENTATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

正文电离辐射咨询委员会第三分会(中子测量)对252Cf放射性核素源的中子发射率进行了一次初级测量比较。在 2016 年至 2020 年期间,向所有参与者分发了一个 252Cf 源。十个实验室参加了此次活动:CMI(捷克共和国)、KRISS(大韩民国)、IRD/LNMRI(巴西)、LNE-LNHB(法国)、NIM(中国)、NIST(美国)、NMIJ(日本)、NPL(英国)、NRC(加拿大)和 VNIIM(俄罗斯),其中 NPL 在活动开始时进行测量,并在活动结束时重复测量,以验证源中的 250Cf 含量。每个实验室都报告了 4π sr 的发射率以及详细的不确定性预算。所有参与者都使用了锰浴技术,只有日本国家海洋研究所使用了一种基于石墨堆中 3He 探测器测量的相对方法。VNIIM 也使用了伴生粒子技术进行测量。CMI、KRISS、LNE-LNHB、NIM、NPL 和 VNIIM 还测量了源的各向异性,尽管这并不是比较的正式组成部分。请注意,此文本是出现在 BIPM 关键对比数据库附录 B 中的文本 https://www.bipm.org/kcdb/.The 根据 CIPM 互认安排 (CIPM MRA) 的规定,最终报告已经过同行评审,并获准由 CCRI 出版。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
International comparison of measurements of neutron source emission rate (2016-2021) - CCRI(III)-K9.Cf.2016
Main textSection III (neutron measurements) of the Comité Consultatif des Rayonnements Ionisants, CCRI, conducted a comparison of primary measurements of the neutron emission rate of a 252Cf radionuclide source. A single 252Cf source was circulated to all participants between 2016 and 2020. Ten laboratories participated -CMI (Czech Republic), KRISS (Republic of Korea), IRD/LNMRI (Brazil), LNE-LNHB (France), NIM (China), NIST (USA), NMIJ (Japan), NPL (UK), NRC (Canada) and VNIIM (Russia) - with NPL making their measurements at the start and repeating them at the end of the exercise to verify the 250Cf content of the source. Each laboratory reported the emission rate into 4π sr together with a detailed uncertainty budget. All participants used the manganese bath technique except NMIJ who used a relative method based on measurements with a 3He detector in a graphite pile. VNIIM also made measurements using an associated particle technique. CMI, KRISS, LNE-LNHB, NIM, NPL and VNIIM also measured the anisotropy of the source although this did not formally form part of the comparison.To reach the main text of this paper, click on Final Report. Note that this text is that which appears in Appendix B of the BIPM key comparison database https://www.bipm.org/kcdb/.The final report has been peer-reviewed and approved for publication by the CCRI, according to the provisions of the CIPM Mutual Recognition Arrangement (CIPM MRA).
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Metrologia
Metrologia 工程技术-物理:应用
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
25.00%
发文量
137
审稿时长
12 months
期刊介绍: Published 6 times per year, Metrologia covers the fundamentals of measurements, particularly those dealing with the seven base units of the International System of Units (metre, kilogram, second, ampere, kelvin, candela, mole) or proposals to replace them. The journal also publishes papers that contribute to the solution of difficult measurement problems and improve the accuracy of derived units and constants that are of fundamental importance to physics. In addition to regular papers, the journal publishes review articles, issues devoted to single topics of timely interest and occasional conference proceedings. Letters to the Editor and Short Communications (generally three pages or less) are also considered.
期刊最新文献
Conversion of a piston-cylinder dimensional dataset to the effective area of a mechanical pressure generator. Evaluating the structural and predictive validity of a derivational morphology task with struggling adult readers. A robust time scale for space applications using the student’s t-distribution A digital four-arm bridge for the comparison of resistance with capacitance Traceable characterisation of fibre-coupled single-photon detectors
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1