N J Roberts, N A Horwood, Z Vykydal, H Park, J Kim, W W Pereira, E S da Fonseca, C Thiam, Zhang Hui, M S Dewey, H P Mumm, H Harano, T Matsumoto, A Masuda, S Manabe, J P Archambault, N N Moiseev, A V Didyk
{"title":"中子源发射率测量的国际比较(2016-2021 年)--CCRI(III)-K9.Cf.2016","authors":"N J Roberts, N A Horwood, Z Vykydal, H Park, J Kim, W W Pereira, E S da Fonseca, C Thiam, Zhang Hui, M S Dewey, H P Mumm, H Harano, T Matsumoto, A Masuda, S Manabe, J P Archambault, N N Moiseev, A V Didyk","doi":"10.1088/0026-1394/61/1a/06001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<title>Main text</title>Section III (neutron measurements) of the Comité Consultatif des Rayonnements Ionisants, CCRI, conducted a comparison of primary measurements of the neutron emission rate of a <sup>252</sup>Cf radionuclide source. A single <sup>252</sup>Cf source was circulated to all participants between 2016 and 2020. Ten laboratories participated -CMI (Czech Republic), KRISS (Republic of Korea), IRD/LNMRI (Brazil), LNE-LNHB (France), NIM (China), NIST (USA), NMIJ (Japan), NPL (UK), NRC (Canada) and VNIIM (Russia) - with NPL making their measurements at the start and repeating them at the end of the exercise to verify the <sup>250</sup>Cf content of the source. Each laboratory reported the emission rate into 4π sr together with a detailed uncertainty budget. All participants used the manganese bath technique except NMIJ who used a relative method based on measurements with a <sup>3</sup>He detector in a graphite pile. VNIIM also made measurements using an associated particle technique. CMI, KRISS, LNE-LNHB, NIM, NPL and VNIIM also measured the anisotropy of the source although this did not formally form part of the comparison.To reach the main text of this paper, click on <ext-link xlink:href=\"https://www.bipm.org/documents/d/guest/ccri-iii-k9-cf-252-2016\" xlink:type=\"simple\">Final Report</ext-link>. Note that this text is that which appears in Appendix B of the BIPM key comparison database <ext-link xlink:href=\"https://www.bipm.org/kcdb/\" xlink:type=\"simple\">https://www.bipm.org/kcdb/</ext-link>.The final report has been peer-reviewed and approved for publication by the CCRI, according to the provisions of the CIPM Mutual Recognition Arrangement (CIPM MRA).","PeriodicalId":18444,"journal":{"name":"Metrologia","volume":"16 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"International comparison of measurements of neutron source emission rate (2016-2021) - CCRI(III)-K9.Cf.2016\",\"authors\":\"N J Roberts, N A Horwood, Z Vykydal, H Park, J Kim, W W Pereira, E S da Fonseca, C Thiam, Zhang Hui, M S Dewey, H P Mumm, H Harano, T Matsumoto, A Masuda, S Manabe, J P Archambault, N N Moiseev, A V Didyk\",\"doi\":\"10.1088/0026-1394/61/1a/06001\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<title>Main text</title>Section III (neutron measurements) of the Comité Consultatif des Rayonnements Ionisants, CCRI, conducted a comparison of primary measurements of the neutron emission rate of a <sup>252</sup>Cf radionuclide source. A single <sup>252</sup>Cf source was circulated to all participants between 2016 and 2020. Ten laboratories participated -CMI (Czech Republic), KRISS (Republic of Korea), IRD/LNMRI (Brazil), LNE-LNHB (France), NIM (China), NIST (USA), NMIJ (Japan), NPL (UK), NRC (Canada) and VNIIM (Russia) - with NPL making their measurements at the start and repeating them at the end of the exercise to verify the <sup>250</sup>Cf content of the source. Each laboratory reported the emission rate into 4π sr together with a detailed uncertainty budget. All participants used the manganese bath technique except NMIJ who used a relative method based on measurements with a <sup>3</sup>He detector in a graphite pile. VNIIM also made measurements using an associated particle technique. CMI, KRISS, LNE-LNHB, NIM, NPL and VNIIM also measured the anisotropy of the source although this did not formally form part of the comparison.To reach the main text of this paper, click on <ext-link xlink:href=\\\"https://www.bipm.org/documents/d/guest/ccri-iii-k9-cf-252-2016\\\" xlink:type=\\\"simple\\\">Final Report</ext-link>. Note that this text is that which appears in Appendix B of the BIPM key comparison database <ext-link xlink:href=\\\"https://www.bipm.org/kcdb/\\\" xlink:type=\\\"simple\\\">https://www.bipm.org/kcdb/</ext-link>.The final report has been peer-reviewed and approved for publication by the CCRI, according to the provisions of the CIPM Mutual Recognition Arrangement (CIPM MRA).\",\"PeriodicalId\":18444,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Metrologia\",\"volume\":\"16 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Metrologia\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1088/0026-1394/61/1a/06001\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"INSTRUMENTS & INSTRUMENTATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Metrologia","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1088/0026-1394/61/1a/06001","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"INSTRUMENTS & INSTRUMENTATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
International comparison of measurements of neutron source emission rate (2016-2021) - CCRI(III)-K9.Cf.2016
Main textSection III (neutron measurements) of the Comité Consultatif des Rayonnements Ionisants, CCRI, conducted a comparison of primary measurements of the neutron emission rate of a 252Cf radionuclide source. A single 252Cf source was circulated to all participants between 2016 and 2020. Ten laboratories participated -CMI (Czech Republic), KRISS (Republic of Korea), IRD/LNMRI (Brazil), LNE-LNHB (France), NIM (China), NIST (USA), NMIJ (Japan), NPL (UK), NRC (Canada) and VNIIM (Russia) - with NPL making their measurements at the start and repeating them at the end of the exercise to verify the 250Cf content of the source. Each laboratory reported the emission rate into 4π sr together with a detailed uncertainty budget. All participants used the manganese bath technique except NMIJ who used a relative method based on measurements with a 3He detector in a graphite pile. VNIIM also made measurements using an associated particle technique. CMI, KRISS, LNE-LNHB, NIM, NPL and VNIIM also measured the anisotropy of the source although this did not formally form part of the comparison.To reach the main text of this paper, click on Final Report. Note that this text is that which appears in Appendix B of the BIPM key comparison database https://www.bipm.org/kcdb/.The final report has been peer-reviewed and approved for publication by the CCRI, according to the provisions of the CIPM Mutual Recognition Arrangement (CIPM MRA).
期刊介绍:
Published 6 times per year, Metrologia covers the fundamentals of measurements, particularly those dealing with the seven base units of the International System of Units (metre, kilogram, second, ampere, kelvin, candela, mole) or proposals to replace them.
The journal also publishes papers that contribute to the solution of difficult measurement problems and improve the accuracy of derived units and constants that are of fundamental importance to physics.
In addition to regular papers, the journal publishes review articles, issues devoted to single topics of timely interest and occasional conference proceedings. Letters to the Editor and Short Communications (generally three pages or less) are also considered.