Andrew McBride , Lauren C. Howe , Janaki Gooty , George C. Banks
{"title":"用反事实透镜看问题:领导力与身份交叉点上的另类假设","authors":"Andrew McBride , Lauren C. Howe , Janaki Gooty , George C. Banks","doi":"10.1016/j.leaqua.2023.101769","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Two increasingly popular domains of research have made great strides explaining leadership via an identity lens (<span>Haslam et al., 2022</span><span>). These domains focus either on a leader’s own identity or on a leader’s influence in representing and altering the identities of others. Our paper contributes to these areas by highlighting dominant assumptions underlying the literatures and generating counterfactual assumptions in need of systematic exploration. It is important to acknowledge and evaluate assumptions because of the role they play in what we study and how we interpret data. As such, our paper brings existing assumptions to light and generates counterfactuals that are in need of more sustained empirical work. Our work thus sets out to a) expose existing assumptions at the intersection of leadership and identity, b) generate theoretically plausible counterfactual assumptions and c) identify themes tying our counterfactual assumptions together. Together, this paper supports, challenges, and promotes the extension of research applying an identity lens to leadership.</span></p></div>","PeriodicalId":48434,"journal":{"name":"Leadership Quarterly","volume":"35 2","pages":"Article 101769"},"PeriodicalIF":9.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Seeing with counterfactual lenses: Alternative assumptions at the intersection of leadership and identity\",\"authors\":\"Andrew McBride , Lauren C. Howe , Janaki Gooty , George C. Banks\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.leaqua.2023.101769\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Two increasingly popular domains of research have made great strides explaining leadership via an identity lens (<span>Haslam et al., 2022</span><span>). These domains focus either on a leader’s own identity or on a leader’s influence in representing and altering the identities of others. Our paper contributes to these areas by highlighting dominant assumptions underlying the literatures and generating counterfactual assumptions in need of systematic exploration. It is important to acknowledge and evaluate assumptions because of the role they play in what we study and how we interpret data. As such, our paper brings existing assumptions to light and generates counterfactuals that are in need of more sustained empirical work. Our work thus sets out to a) expose existing assumptions at the intersection of leadership and identity, b) generate theoretically plausible counterfactual assumptions and c) identify themes tying our counterfactual assumptions together. Together, this paper supports, challenges, and promotes the extension of research applying an identity lens to leadership.</span></p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48434,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Leadership Quarterly\",\"volume\":\"35 2\",\"pages\":\"Article 101769\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":9.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Leadership Quarterly\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"91\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1048984323000954\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"管理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MANAGEMENT\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Leadership Quarterly","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1048984323000954","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
有两个日益流行的研究领域在通过身份视角解释领导力方面取得了长足的进步(Haslam et al.)这些研究领域要么关注领导者自身的身份认同,要么关注领导者在代表和改变他人身份认同方面的影响力。我们的论文强调了这些文献中的主导假设,并提出了需要系统探讨的反事实假设,从而为这些领域做出了贡献。承认和评估假设是非常重要的,因为它们在我们的研究内容和如何解释数据方面发挥着重要作用。因此,我们的论文揭示了现有的假设,并提出了需要进行更持久的实证研究的反事实假设。因此,我们的工作旨在:a)揭示领导力与身份交叉点上的现有假设;b)提出理论上合理的反事实假设;c)确定将我们的反事实假设联系在一起的主题。总之,本文支持、挑战并促进了将身份视角应用于领导力的研究。
Seeing with counterfactual lenses: Alternative assumptions at the intersection of leadership and identity
Two increasingly popular domains of research have made great strides explaining leadership via an identity lens (Haslam et al., 2022). These domains focus either on a leader’s own identity or on a leader’s influence in representing and altering the identities of others. Our paper contributes to these areas by highlighting dominant assumptions underlying the literatures and generating counterfactual assumptions in need of systematic exploration. It is important to acknowledge and evaluate assumptions because of the role they play in what we study and how we interpret data. As such, our paper brings existing assumptions to light and generates counterfactuals that are in need of more sustained empirical work. Our work thus sets out to a) expose existing assumptions at the intersection of leadership and identity, b) generate theoretically plausible counterfactual assumptions and c) identify themes tying our counterfactual assumptions together. Together, this paper supports, challenges, and promotes the extension of research applying an identity lens to leadership.
期刊介绍:
The Leadership Quarterly is a social-science journal dedicated to advancing our understanding of leadership as a phenomenon, how to study it, as well as its practical implications.
Leadership Quarterly seeks contributions from various disciplinary perspectives, including psychology broadly defined (i.e., industrial-organizational, social, evolutionary, biological, differential), management (i.e., organizational behavior, strategy, organizational theory), political science, sociology, economics (i.e., personnel, behavioral, labor), anthropology, history, and methodology.Equally desirable are contributions from multidisciplinary perspectives.