随机试验:使用射频治疗更年期泌尿生殖系统综合征。

IF 2.9 4区 医学 Q1 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY Climacteric Pub Date : 2024-04-01 Epub Date: 2024-01-22 DOI:10.1080/13697137.2024.2302425
A Joris, V Di Pietrantonio, J Praet, K Renard, A-C Verduyn, F Buxant, S Rozenberg
{"title":"随机试验:使用射频治疗更年期泌尿生殖系统综合征。","authors":"A Joris, V Di Pietrantonio, J Praet, K Renard, A-C Verduyn, F Buxant, S Rozenberg","doi":"10.1080/13697137.2024.2302425","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>A randomized controlled study was conducted to evaluate the safety and efficacy of radiofrequency treatment in postmenopausal women not willing to use or presenting a contraindication for menopause hormone therapy (MHT) and suffering from genitourinary syndrome of menopause (GSM).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A prospective randomized open study evaluated the effect of radiofrequency treatment versus a gel (control group) in postmenopausal women suffering from GSM. Patients were assessed at baseline and after 10-12 weeks of treatment for severity of vulvovaginal atrophy, dyspareunia, pH, vaginal smear maturation index, Vaginal Health Index and Female Sexual Function Index. The difference at baseline and after 10-12 weeks of treatment and the difference in improvement were tested between groups by a two-sample <i>t</i>-test and the Mann-Whitney test.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Due to the COVID-19 pandemic, we were only able to treat 48 patients (24 patients using radiofrequency and 24 patients using a gel). Globally, at the end of the study, there were no differences in changes of the measured outcomes between the group of women treated with radiofrequency and the control group.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Radiofrequency treatment was found to be safe, but was not superior to a gel, although the study lacked power. The study was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT03857893).</p>","PeriodicalId":10213,"journal":{"name":"Climacteric","volume":" ","pages":"210-214"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Randomized trial: treatment of genitourinary syndrome of menopause using radiofrequency.\",\"authors\":\"A Joris, V Di Pietrantonio, J Praet, K Renard, A-C Verduyn, F Buxant, S Rozenberg\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/13697137.2024.2302425\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>A randomized controlled study was conducted to evaluate the safety and efficacy of radiofrequency treatment in postmenopausal women not willing to use or presenting a contraindication for menopause hormone therapy (MHT) and suffering from genitourinary syndrome of menopause (GSM).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A prospective randomized open study evaluated the effect of radiofrequency treatment versus a gel (control group) in postmenopausal women suffering from GSM. Patients were assessed at baseline and after 10-12 weeks of treatment for severity of vulvovaginal atrophy, dyspareunia, pH, vaginal smear maturation index, Vaginal Health Index and Female Sexual Function Index. The difference at baseline and after 10-12 weeks of treatment and the difference in improvement were tested between groups by a two-sample <i>t</i>-test and the Mann-Whitney test.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Due to the COVID-19 pandemic, we were only able to treat 48 patients (24 patients using radiofrequency and 24 patients using a gel). Globally, at the end of the study, there were no differences in changes of the measured outcomes between the group of women treated with radiofrequency and the control group.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Radiofrequency treatment was found to be safe, but was not superior to a gel, although the study lacked power. The study was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT03857893).</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10213,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Climacteric\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"210-214\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Climacteric\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/13697137.2024.2302425\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/1/22 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Climacteric","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13697137.2024.2302425","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/22 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

研究目的方法:一项随机对照研究评估了射频治疗对不愿意使用或有绝经激素疗法(MHT)禁忌症、患有绝经期泌尿生殖系统综合征(GSM)的绝经后妇女的安全性和有效性:一项前瞻性随机开放研究评估了射频治疗与凝胶(对照组)对绝经后 GSM 患者的效果。在基线和治疗 10-12 周后,对患者的外阴阴道萎缩严重程度、排便困难、pH 值、阴道涂片成熟指数、阴道健康指数和女性性功能指数进行评估。通过双样本 t 检验和 Mann-Whitney 检验来检验基线和治疗 10-12 周后的差异以及组间改善程度的差异:结果:由于 COVID-19 大流行,我们只能治疗 48 名患者(24 名患者使用射频,24 名患者使用凝胶)。总体而言,在研究结束时,接受射频治疗的妇女组与对照组在测量结果的变化上没有差异:结论:射频治疗是安全的,但并不优于凝胶治疗,尽管这项研究缺乏说服力。该研究已在 ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT03857893) 上注册。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Randomized trial: treatment of genitourinary syndrome of menopause using radiofrequency.

Objective: A randomized controlled study was conducted to evaluate the safety and efficacy of radiofrequency treatment in postmenopausal women not willing to use or presenting a contraindication for menopause hormone therapy (MHT) and suffering from genitourinary syndrome of menopause (GSM).

Methods: A prospective randomized open study evaluated the effect of radiofrequency treatment versus a gel (control group) in postmenopausal women suffering from GSM. Patients were assessed at baseline and after 10-12 weeks of treatment for severity of vulvovaginal atrophy, dyspareunia, pH, vaginal smear maturation index, Vaginal Health Index and Female Sexual Function Index. The difference at baseline and after 10-12 weeks of treatment and the difference in improvement were tested between groups by a two-sample t-test and the Mann-Whitney test.

Results: Due to the COVID-19 pandemic, we were only able to treat 48 patients (24 patients using radiofrequency and 24 patients using a gel). Globally, at the end of the study, there were no differences in changes of the measured outcomes between the group of women treated with radiofrequency and the control group.

Conclusion: Radiofrequency treatment was found to be safe, but was not superior to a gel, although the study lacked power. The study was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT03857893).

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Climacteric
Climacteric 医学-妇产科学
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
7.10%
发文量
53
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Climacteric is the official journal of the International Menopause Society (IMS). As an international peer-reviewed journal it publishes original research and reviews of all aspects of aging in women. Climacteric was founded by the IMS in 1998 and today has become a leading journal in the publication of peer-reviewed papers on the menopause, climacteric and mid-life health. Topics covered include endocrine changes, symptoms attributed to the menopause and their treatment, hormone replacement and alternative therapies, lifestyles, and the counselling and education of peri- and postmenopausal women. Climacteric, published bimonthly, also features regular invited reviews, editorials and commentaries on recent developments. The editorial review board of Climacteric includes leading scientific and clinical experts in the field of midlife medicine and research and is headed by its Editor-in-Chief, Professor Rod Baber of Australia. He and his team of Associate Editors act independently to set a clear editorial policy, co-ordinate peer review, and ensure a rapid response to submitted papers.
期刊最新文献
Unraveling sleep quality in menopausal women: objective assessments and self-reported experiences - a mini-review. Second pregnancy in China 5 years after ovarian tissue transplantation to prevent iatrogenic POI. Preparing for the future: artificial intelligence in menopausal health care. Analysis of multimorbidity patterns in perimenopausal women based on medical examination data. Peer reviewers for Climacteric in 2024.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1