{"title":"视网膜静脉闭塞继发浆液性黄斑脱离的全身炎症标志物水平","authors":"Emine Doğan, Kübra Özata Gündoğdu, Özlem Bursalı, Erkan Çelik, Gürsoy Alagöz","doi":"10.4103/joco.joco_44_23","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To evaluate the association of systemic inflammatory marker levels in macular edema with serous macular detachment (SMD) secondary to retinal vein occlusion (RVO).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients diagnosed with RVO were categorized into two groups based on the presence or absence of SMD: Group 1 included 30 eyes with SMD, while Group 2 included 30 eyes without SMD. Levels of neutrophils, monocytes, lymphocytes, thrombocytes, and mean platelet volume (MPV) were analyzed. Systemic inflammatory markers, including neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), platelet-lymphocyte ratio (PLR), and systemic immune-inflammation index (SII), were calculated and compared between the two groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean neutrophil levels were significantly higher in Group 1 (<i>P</i> = 0.002). The mean lymphocyte, monocytes, thrombocyte, and MPV levels did not differ significantly between groups. NLR and SII levels were significantly higher in the SMD group (<i>P</i> = 0.004 and <i>P</i> = 0.016, respectively). There was no significant difference between the groups in terms of PLR. The optimal receiver operator characteristic (ROC) cut-off value of NLR for SMD was calculated as 1.55 with 73% sensitivity and 63% specificity (area under the curve [AUC] = 0.714, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.584-0.845). The optimal ROC cut-off value of SII for SMD was calculated as 451.75 with 63% sensitivity and 63% specificity (AUC = 0.681, 95% CI: 0.546-0.816). In this study, branch RVO was present in 48 patients, and central RVO was present in 12 patients. Neutrophil, MPV levels, and NLR, PLR, SII ratios were similar between patients with branch and central occlusion.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Neutrophil levels, NLR, and SII were found to be significantly higher in eyes with SMD secondary to RVO.</p>","PeriodicalId":15423,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Current Ophthalmology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10795820/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Systemic Inflammatory Marker Levels in Serous Macular Detachment Secondary to Retinal Vein Occlusion.\",\"authors\":\"Emine Doğan, Kübra Özata Gündoğdu, Özlem Bursalı, Erkan Çelik, Gürsoy Alagöz\",\"doi\":\"10.4103/joco.joco_44_23\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To evaluate the association of systemic inflammatory marker levels in macular edema with serous macular detachment (SMD) secondary to retinal vein occlusion (RVO).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients diagnosed with RVO were categorized into two groups based on the presence or absence of SMD: Group 1 included 30 eyes with SMD, while Group 2 included 30 eyes without SMD. Levels of neutrophils, monocytes, lymphocytes, thrombocytes, and mean platelet volume (MPV) were analyzed. Systemic inflammatory markers, including neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), platelet-lymphocyte ratio (PLR), and systemic immune-inflammation index (SII), were calculated and compared between the two groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean neutrophil levels were significantly higher in Group 1 (<i>P</i> = 0.002). The mean lymphocyte, monocytes, thrombocyte, and MPV levels did not differ significantly between groups. NLR and SII levels were significantly higher in the SMD group (<i>P</i> = 0.004 and <i>P</i> = 0.016, respectively). There was no significant difference between the groups in terms of PLR. The optimal receiver operator characteristic (ROC) cut-off value of NLR for SMD was calculated as 1.55 with 73% sensitivity and 63% specificity (area under the curve [AUC] = 0.714, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.584-0.845). The optimal ROC cut-off value of SII for SMD was calculated as 451.75 with 63% sensitivity and 63% specificity (AUC = 0.681, 95% CI: 0.546-0.816). In this study, branch RVO was present in 48 patients, and central RVO was present in 12 patients. Neutrophil, MPV levels, and NLR, PLR, SII ratios were similar between patients with branch and central occlusion.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Neutrophil levels, NLR, and SII were found to be significantly higher in eyes with SMD secondary to RVO.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15423,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Current Ophthalmology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-12-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10795820/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Current Ophthalmology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4103/joco.joco_44_23\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/4/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"OPHTHALMOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Current Ophthalmology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/joco.joco_44_23","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/4/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Systemic Inflammatory Marker Levels in Serous Macular Detachment Secondary to Retinal Vein Occlusion.
Purpose: To evaluate the association of systemic inflammatory marker levels in macular edema with serous macular detachment (SMD) secondary to retinal vein occlusion (RVO).
Methods: Patients diagnosed with RVO were categorized into two groups based on the presence or absence of SMD: Group 1 included 30 eyes with SMD, while Group 2 included 30 eyes without SMD. Levels of neutrophils, monocytes, lymphocytes, thrombocytes, and mean platelet volume (MPV) were analyzed. Systemic inflammatory markers, including neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), platelet-lymphocyte ratio (PLR), and systemic immune-inflammation index (SII), were calculated and compared between the two groups.
Results: The mean neutrophil levels were significantly higher in Group 1 (P = 0.002). The mean lymphocyte, monocytes, thrombocyte, and MPV levels did not differ significantly between groups. NLR and SII levels were significantly higher in the SMD group (P = 0.004 and P = 0.016, respectively). There was no significant difference between the groups in terms of PLR. The optimal receiver operator characteristic (ROC) cut-off value of NLR for SMD was calculated as 1.55 with 73% sensitivity and 63% specificity (area under the curve [AUC] = 0.714, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.584-0.845). The optimal ROC cut-off value of SII for SMD was calculated as 451.75 with 63% sensitivity and 63% specificity (AUC = 0.681, 95% CI: 0.546-0.816). In this study, branch RVO was present in 48 patients, and central RVO was present in 12 patients. Neutrophil, MPV levels, and NLR, PLR, SII ratios were similar between patients with branch and central occlusion.
Conclusion: Neutrophil levels, NLR, and SII were found to be significantly higher in eyes with SMD secondary to RVO.
期刊介绍:
Peer Review under the responsibility of Iranian Society of Ophthalmology Journal of Current Ophthalmology, the official publication of the Iranian Society of Ophthalmology, is a peer-reviewed, open-access, scientific journal that welcomes high quality original articles related to vision science and all fields of ophthalmology. Journal of Current Ophthalmology is the continuum of Iranian Journal of Ophthalmology published since 1969.