Pedro David Delgado-López, Antonio Montalvo-Afonso, Javier Martín-Alonso, Vicente Martín-Velasco, Rubén Diana-Martín, José Manuel Castilla-Díez
{"title":"通过对肿瘤表面不规则性的客观评估,预测无症状脑膜瘤的组织学分级。","authors":"Pedro David Delgado-López, Antonio Montalvo-Afonso, Javier Martín-Alonso, Vicente Martín-Velasco, Rubén Diana-Martín, José Manuel Castilla-Díez","doi":"10.1016/j.neucie.2023.10.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>Predicting the histopathologic grade of meningioma is relevant because local recurrence is significantly greater in WHO grade II–III compared to WHO grade I tumours, which would ideally benefit from a more aggressive surgical strategy. It has been suggested that higher WHO grade tumours are more irregularly-shaped. However, irregularity is a subjective and observer-dependent feature. In this study, the tumour surface irregularity of a large series of meningiomas, measured upon preoperative MRI, is quantified and correlated with the WHO grade.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Unicentric retrospective observational study of a cohort of symptomatic meningiomas surgically removed in the time period between January 2015 and December 2022. Using specific segmentation software, the Surface Factor (SF) was calculated for each meningioma. SF is an objective parameter that compares the surface of a sphere (minimum surface area for a given volume) with the same volume of the tumour against the actual surface of the tumour. This ratio varies from 0 to 1, being 1 the maximum sphericity. Since irregularly-shaped meningiomas present proportionally greater surface area, the SF tends to decrease as irregularity increases. SF was correlated with WHO grade and its predictive power was estimated with ROC curve analysis.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>A total of 176 patients (64.7% females) were included in the study; 120 WHO grade I (71.9%), 43 WHO grade II (25.7%) and 4 WHO grade III (2.4%). A statistically significant difference was found between the mean SF of WHO grade I and WHO grade II–III tumours (0.8651 ± 0.049 versus 0.7081 ± 0.105, <em>p</em><span> < 0.0001). Globally, the SF correctly classified more than 90% of cases (area under ROC curve 0.940) with 93.3% sensibility and 80.9% specificity. A cutoff value of 0.79 yielded the maximum precision, with positive and negative predictive powers of 82.6% and 92.6%, respectively. Multivariate analysis<span> yielded SF as an independent prognostic factor of WHO grade.</span></span></p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>The <em>Surface Factor</em> is an objective and quantitative parameter that helps to identify aggressive meningiomas preoperatively. A cutoff value of 0.79 allowed differentiation between WHO grade I and WHO grade II–III with high precision.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":74273,"journal":{"name":"Neurocirugia (English Edition)","volume":"35 3","pages":"Pages 113-121"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Predicting histological grade in symptomatic meningioma by an objective estimation of the tumoral surface irregularity\",\"authors\":\"Pedro David Delgado-López, Antonio Montalvo-Afonso, Javier Martín-Alonso, Vicente Martín-Velasco, Rubén Diana-Martín, José Manuel Castilla-Díez\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.neucie.2023.10.002\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>Predicting the histopathologic grade of meningioma is relevant because local recurrence is significantly greater in WHO grade II–III compared to WHO grade I tumours, which would ideally benefit from a more aggressive surgical strategy. It has been suggested that higher WHO grade tumours are more irregularly-shaped. However, irregularity is a subjective and observer-dependent feature. In this study, the tumour surface irregularity of a large series of meningiomas, measured upon preoperative MRI, is quantified and correlated with the WHO grade.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Unicentric retrospective observational study of a cohort of symptomatic meningiomas surgically removed in the time period between January 2015 and December 2022. Using specific segmentation software, the Surface Factor (SF) was calculated for each meningioma. SF is an objective parameter that compares the surface of a sphere (minimum surface area for a given volume) with the same volume of the tumour against the actual surface of the tumour. This ratio varies from 0 to 1, being 1 the maximum sphericity. Since irregularly-shaped meningiomas present proportionally greater surface area, the SF tends to decrease as irregularity increases. SF was correlated with WHO grade and its predictive power was estimated with ROC curve analysis.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>A total of 176 patients (64.7% females) were included in the study; 120 WHO grade I (71.9%), 43 WHO grade II (25.7%) and 4 WHO grade III (2.4%). A statistically significant difference was found between the mean SF of WHO grade I and WHO grade II–III tumours (0.8651 ± 0.049 versus 0.7081 ± 0.105, <em>p</em><span> < 0.0001). Globally, the SF correctly classified more than 90% of cases (area under ROC curve 0.940) with 93.3% sensibility and 80.9% specificity. A cutoff value of 0.79 yielded the maximum precision, with positive and negative predictive powers of 82.6% and 92.6%, respectively. Multivariate analysis<span> yielded SF as an independent prognostic factor of WHO grade.</span></span></p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>The <em>Surface Factor</em> is an objective and quantitative parameter that helps to identify aggressive meningiomas preoperatively. A cutoff value of 0.79 allowed differentiation between WHO grade I and WHO grade II–III with high precision.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":74273,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Neurocirugia (English Edition)\",\"volume\":\"35 3\",\"pages\":\"Pages 113-121\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Neurocirugia (English Edition)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2529849624000030\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neurocirugia (English Edition)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2529849624000030","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
导言:预测脑膜瘤的组织病理学分级具有重要意义,因为与WHO分级为I级的肿瘤相比,WHO分级为II-III级的肿瘤的局部复发率要高得多。有人认为,WHO 分级越高的肿瘤形状越不规则。然而,不规则是一种主观的、依赖观察者的特征。在本研究中,通过术前磁共振成像测量了大量脑膜瘤的肿瘤表面不规则程度,并将其与WHO分级相关联:方法:对2015年1月至2022年12月期间手术切除的一组无症状脑膜瘤进行单中心回顾性观察研究。使用特定的分割软件,计算每个脑膜瘤的表面因子(SF)。SF 是一个客观参数,用于比较具有相同体积肿瘤的球体表面(给定体积的最小表面积)与肿瘤的实际表面。该比率从 0 到 1 不等,1 为最大球形度。由于形状不规则的脑膜瘤表面积按比例增大,因此 SF 会随着不规则程度的增加而减小。SF 与 WHO 分级相关,并通过 ROC 曲线分析估算其预测能力:研究共纳入 176 名患者(64.7% 为女性),其中 120 名为 WHO I 级(71.9%),43 名为 WHO II 级(25.7%),4 名为 WHO III 级(2.4%)。WHO I级和WHO II-III级肿瘤的平均SF值之间存在明显的统计学差异(0,8651 ± 0,049 对 0,7081 ± 0,105,P 结论:表面因子是一个客观的定量参数,有助于术前识别侵袭性脑膜瘤。0.79 的临界值可以高精度地区分 WHO I 级和 WHO II-III 级。
Predicting histological grade in symptomatic meningioma by an objective estimation of the tumoral surface irregularity
Introduction
Predicting the histopathologic grade of meningioma is relevant because local recurrence is significantly greater in WHO grade II–III compared to WHO grade I tumours, which would ideally benefit from a more aggressive surgical strategy. It has been suggested that higher WHO grade tumours are more irregularly-shaped. However, irregularity is a subjective and observer-dependent feature. In this study, the tumour surface irregularity of a large series of meningiomas, measured upon preoperative MRI, is quantified and correlated with the WHO grade.
Methods
Unicentric retrospective observational study of a cohort of symptomatic meningiomas surgically removed in the time period between January 2015 and December 2022. Using specific segmentation software, the Surface Factor (SF) was calculated for each meningioma. SF is an objective parameter that compares the surface of a sphere (minimum surface area for a given volume) with the same volume of the tumour against the actual surface of the tumour. This ratio varies from 0 to 1, being 1 the maximum sphericity. Since irregularly-shaped meningiomas present proportionally greater surface area, the SF tends to decrease as irregularity increases. SF was correlated with WHO grade and its predictive power was estimated with ROC curve analysis.
Results
A total of 176 patients (64.7% females) were included in the study; 120 WHO grade I (71.9%), 43 WHO grade II (25.7%) and 4 WHO grade III (2.4%). A statistically significant difference was found between the mean SF of WHO grade I and WHO grade II–III tumours (0.8651 ± 0.049 versus 0.7081 ± 0.105, p < 0.0001). Globally, the SF correctly classified more than 90% of cases (area under ROC curve 0.940) with 93.3% sensibility and 80.9% specificity. A cutoff value of 0.79 yielded the maximum precision, with positive and negative predictive powers of 82.6% and 92.6%, respectively. Multivariate analysis yielded SF as an independent prognostic factor of WHO grade.
Conclusion
The Surface Factor is an objective and quantitative parameter that helps to identify aggressive meningiomas preoperatively. A cutoff value of 0.79 allowed differentiation between WHO grade I and WHO grade II–III with high precision.