运动胶带对足底筋膜炎患者疼痛的影响:随机对照研究。

IF 2.1 4区 医学 Q1 REHABILITATION Disability and Rehabilitation Pub Date : 2024-11-01 Epub Date: 2024-01-20 DOI:10.1080/09638288.2024.2304645
Carmen García-Gomariz, María-Teresa García-Martínez, Montserrat Alcahuz-Griñán, David Hernández-Guillén, José-M Blasco
{"title":"运动胶带对足底筋膜炎患者疼痛的影响:随机对照研究。","authors":"Carmen García-Gomariz, María-Teresa García-Martínez, Montserrat Alcahuz-Griñán, David Hernández-Guillén, José-M Blasco","doi":"10.1080/09638288.2024.2304645","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose.: </strong>Plantar fasciitis is the most frequent cause of heel pain. Custom-made plantar supports are a common treatment solution, while the application of kinesiology tape (KT) can be an effective measure to alleviate pain. The objective was to evaluate the effects of KT on the pain of patients with plantar fasciitis.</p><p><strong>Methods.: </strong>Randomized controlled trial including participants with plantar fasciitis. There was an experimental group (<i>n</i> = 17), whose participants underwent a KT treatment, and a control (sham tape) group (<i>n</i> = 17). The pain, measured with a visual analog scale (VAS), was the primary outcome and was assessed daily until the fifth day of wearing the tape and 24 h after removing it. Inferential statistics looked for time, group, and time per group differences with CI at 95%.</p><p><strong>Results.: </strong>The greatest between-group VAS difference was 3.5 points, and occurred at the 2-day follow-up assessment. Then, pain differences decreased over time until the last assessment point. Statistically significant time, group, and time*group differences were found with <i>p <</i> 0.001.</p><p><strong>Conclusion.: </strong>This study supports that KT is effective in reducing pain in the short term in patients with plantar fasciitis, and more effective than a sham intervention with tape.</p>","PeriodicalId":50575,"journal":{"name":"Disability and Rehabilitation","volume":" ","pages":"5490-5496"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effects on pain of kinesiology tape in patients with plantar fasciitis: a randomized controlled study.\",\"authors\":\"Carmen García-Gomariz, María-Teresa García-Martínez, Montserrat Alcahuz-Griñán, David Hernández-Guillén, José-M Blasco\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/09638288.2024.2304645\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose.: </strong>Plantar fasciitis is the most frequent cause of heel pain. Custom-made plantar supports are a common treatment solution, while the application of kinesiology tape (KT) can be an effective measure to alleviate pain. The objective was to evaluate the effects of KT on the pain of patients with plantar fasciitis.</p><p><strong>Methods.: </strong>Randomized controlled trial including participants with plantar fasciitis. There was an experimental group (<i>n</i> = 17), whose participants underwent a KT treatment, and a control (sham tape) group (<i>n</i> = 17). The pain, measured with a visual analog scale (VAS), was the primary outcome and was assessed daily until the fifth day of wearing the tape and 24 h after removing it. Inferential statistics looked for time, group, and time per group differences with CI at 95%.</p><p><strong>Results.: </strong>The greatest between-group VAS difference was 3.5 points, and occurred at the 2-day follow-up assessment. Then, pain differences decreased over time until the last assessment point. Statistically significant time, group, and time*group differences were found with <i>p <</i> 0.001.</p><p><strong>Conclusion.: </strong>This study supports that KT is effective in reducing pain in the short term in patients with plantar fasciitis, and more effective than a sham intervention with tape.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50575,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Disability and Rehabilitation\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"5490-5496\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Disability and Rehabilitation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/09638288.2024.2304645\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/1/20 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"REHABILITATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Disability and Rehabilitation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/09638288.2024.2304645","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/20 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的足底筋膜炎是导致足跟疼痛的最常见原因。定制足底支撑是一种常见的治疗方法,而粘贴运动胶带(KT)则是缓解疼痛的有效措施。该研究旨在评估 KT 对足底筋膜炎患者疼痛的影响:包括足底筋膜炎患者在内的随机对照试验。实验组(17 人)和对照组(17 人)分别接受了 KT 治疗。疼痛是主要结果,采用视觉模拟量表(VAS)进行测量,每天进行评估,直至佩戴胶带的第五天和取下胶带后的 24 小时。推理统计寻找时间、组间和每组时间的差异,CI为95%:结果:组间 VAS 差异最大为 3.5 点,出现在 2 天的随访评估中。然后,疼痛差异随着时间的推移逐渐减小,直到最后一个评估点。时间、组间和时间*组间差异均有统计学意义(P 0.001):本研究证实,KT 可在短期内有效减轻足底筋膜炎患者的疼痛,而且比使用胶带进行假干预更有效。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Effects on pain of kinesiology tape in patients with plantar fasciitis: a randomized controlled study.

Purpose.: Plantar fasciitis is the most frequent cause of heel pain. Custom-made plantar supports are a common treatment solution, while the application of kinesiology tape (KT) can be an effective measure to alleviate pain. The objective was to evaluate the effects of KT on the pain of patients with plantar fasciitis.

Methods.: Randomized controlled trial including participants with plantar fasciitis. There was an experimental group (n = 17), whose participants underwent a KT treatment, and a control (sham tape) group (n = 17). The pain, measured with a visual analog scale (VAS), was the primary outcome and was assessed daily until the fifth day of wearing the tape and 24 h after removing it. Inferential statistics looked for time, group, and time per group differences with CI at 95%.

Results.: The greatest between-group VAS difference was 3.5 points, and occurred at the 2-day follow-up assessment. Then, pain differences decreased over time until the last assessment point. Statistically significant time, group, and time*group differences were found with p < 0.001.

Conclusion.: This study supports that KT is effective in reducing pain in the short term in patients with plantar fasciitis, and more effective than a sham intervention with tape.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Disability and Rehabilitation
Disability and Rehabilitation 医学-康复医学
CiteScore
5.00
自引率
9.10%
发文量
415
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: Disability and Rehabilitation along with Disability and Rehabilitation: Assistive Technology are international multidisciplinary journals which seek to encourage a better understanding of all aspects of disability and to promote rehabilitation science, practice and policy aspects of the rehabilitation process.
期刊最新文献
"More than effort, it's dedicating time and perseverance." experiences of physical activity and physical exercise in stroke survivor with high functional capacity: a qualitative study. Development and validation of an observational tool to measure engagement in telepractice early intervention. Exploring perspectives on implementing the World Health Assembly's Resolution for Strengthening Rehabilitation in Health Systems in Switzerland: a representative rehabilitation stakeholder survey. The Albanian version of the Oswestry Disability Index: translation, cross-cultural adaptation, validity, and reliability. Understanding loneliness and its correlates among people with spinal cord injury.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1