团购中的合作机制、产品质量和消费者群体

IF 5.9 3区 管理学 Q1 BUSINESS Electronic Commerce Research and Applications Pub Date : 2024-01-20 DOI:10.1016/j.elerap.2024.101357
Yuqing Jiang , Minxin Wu , Xiao hui Li
{"title":"团购中的合作机制、产品质量和消费者群体","authors":"Yuqing Jiang ,&nbsp;Minxin Wu ,&nbsp;Xiao hui Li","doi":"10.1016/j.elerap.2024.101357","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>We analyze the cooperation mechanism in a group buying channel where a supplier sells products to heterogeneous consumers through an organizer. We consider two cooperation mechanisms: traditional wholesale mechanism and commission negotiation mechanism. In particular, suppliers often need to negotiate the commission fee with organizers who promote products in group buying. The organizer faces two types of consumers who differ in their valuation of product quality (i.e., informed consumers and one less-informed consumers). We identify the conditions under which cooperation mechanism and consumer segment can lead to ”win-win” and ”win-lose” outcomes for the supplier and the organizer in group buying. We find that the supply chain incentives are often misaligned under the wholesale mechanism because the supplier extracts the entire profit from the organizer. However, the supplier and the organizer have perfect alignment of preferences when the operating cost is medium and the bargaining power is not so high. We also show that, when the product quality is endogenous, the commission negotiation mechanism can generate more consumer surplus. The theoretical and managerial insights derived from this work contribute to a deeper conceptual and practical comprehension of how suppliers make strategic decisions in group buying settings.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":50541,"journal":{"name":"Electronic Commerce Research and Applications","volume":"64 ","pages":"Article 101357"},"PeriodicalIF":5.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Cooperation mechanism, product quality, and consumer segment in group buying\",\"authors\":\"Yuqing Jiang ,&nbsp;Minxin Wu ,&nbsp;Xiao hui Li\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.elerap.2024.101357\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>We analyze the cooperation mechanism in a group buying channel where a supplier sells products to heterogeneous consumers through an organizer. We consider two cooperation mechanisms: traditional wholesale mechanism and commission negotiation mechanism. In particular, suppliers often need to negotiate the commission fee with organizers who promote products in group buying. The organizer faces two types of consumers who differ in their valuation of product quality (i.e., informed consumers and one less-informed consumers). We identify the conditions under which cooperation mechanism and consumer segment can lead to ”win-win” and ”win-lose” outcomes for the supplier and the organizer in group buying. We find that the supply chain incentives are often misaligned under the wholesale mechanism because the supplier extracts the entire profit from the organizer. However, the supplier and the organizer have perfect alignment of preferences when the operating cost is medium and the bargaining power is not so high. We also show that, when the product quality is endogenous, the commission negotiation mechanism can generate more consumer surplus. The theoretical and managerial insights derived from this work contribute to a deeper conceptual and practical comprehension of how suppliers make strategic decisions in group buying settings.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50541,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Electronic Commerce Research and Applications\",\"volume\":\"64 \",\"pages\":\"Article 101357\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Electronic Commerce Research and Applications\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"91\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1567422324000024\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"管理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"BUSINESS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Electronic Commerce Research and Applications","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1567422324000024","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

我们分析了团购渠道中的合作机制,即供应商通过组织者向异质消费者销售产品。我们考虑了两种合作机制:传统的批发机制和佣金谈判机制。其中,供应商往往需要与在团购中推广产品的组织者协商佣金费用。组织者面对两类对产品质量评价不同的消费者(即知情消费者和一名不太知情的消费者)。我们确定了在哪些条件下,合作机制和消费者群体可以为团购中的供应商和组织者带来 "双赢 "和 "双输 "的结果。我们发现,在批发机制下,供应链的激励机制往往是错位的,因为供应商从组织者那里获取了全部利润。然而,当运营成本中等、议价能力不高时,供应商和组织者的偏好完全一致。我们还表明,当产品质量是内生的,佣金谈判机制可以产生更多的消费者剩余。这项工作所得出的理论和管理见解有助于从概念和实践上更深入地理解供应商如何在团购环境中做出战略决策。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Cooperation mechanism, product quality, and consumer segment in group buying

We analyze the cooperation mechanism in a group buying channel where a supplier sells products to heterogeneous consumers through an organizer. We consider two cooperation mechanisms: traditional wholesale mechanism and commission negotiation mechanism. In particular, suppliers often need to negotiate the commission fee with organizers who promote products in group buying. The organizer faces two types of consumers who differ in their valuation of product quality (i.e., informed consumers and one less-informed consumers). We identify the conditions under which cooperation mechanism and consumer segment can lead to ”win-win” and ”win-lose” outcomes for the supplier and the organizer in group buying. We find that the supply chain incentives are often misaligned under the wholesale mechanism because the supplier extracts the entire profit from the organizer. However, the supplier and the organizer have perfect alignment of preferences when the operating cost is medium and the bargaining power is not so high. We also show that, when the product quality is endogenous, the commission negotiation mechanism can generate more consumer surplus. The theoretical and managerial insights derived from this work contribute to a deeper conceptual and practical comprehension of how suppliers make strategic decisions in group buying settings.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Electronic Commerce Research and Applications
Electronic Commerce Research and Applications 工程技术-计算机:跨学科应用
CiteScore
10.10
自引率
8.30%
发文量
97
审稿时长
63 days
期刊介绍: Electronic Commerce Research and Applications aims to create and disseminate enduring knowledge for the fast-changing e-commerce environment. A major dilemma in e-commerce research is how to achieve a balance between the currency and the life span of knowledge. Electronic Commerce Research and Applications will contribute to the establishment of a research community to create the knowledge, technology, theory, and applications for the development of electronic commerce. This is targeted at the intersection of technological potential and business aims.
期刊最新文献
Who should provide a trade-in service under the online agency-selling mode? Home is best: Review source and cross-border online shopping Sustaining superior visibility within digital platforms through inside and outside competitive action repertoires The effects of physician’s brand positioning on diagnostic dispensing continuity and cross-provincial healthcare flow: Evidence from an online traditional Chinese medicine community Physical stores versus physical showrooms: Channel structures of online retailers
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1