血管分裂顺序和上皮-间质转化状态对肺腺癌术后复发的影响

IF 0.7 Q3 Medicine ASIAN CARDIOVASCULAR & THORACIC ANNALS Pub Date : 2024-03-01 Epub Date: 2024-01-22 DOI:10.1177/02184923241226468
Shigeto Nishikawa, Toshi Menju, Koji Takahashi, Terumasa Sowa, Akihiko Yoshizawa, Hiroshi Date
{"title":"血管分裂顺序和上皮-间质转化状态对肺腺癌术后复发的影响","authors":"Shigeto Nishikawa, Toshi Menju, Koji Takahashi, Terumasa Sowa, Akihiko Yoshizawa, Hiroshi Date","doi":"10.1177/02184923241226468","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The vascular division sequence in video-assisted thoracic surgery (VATS) lung resection is usually determined by the handling difficulty due to the limited surgical view through the scope. However, upfront pulmonary vein division is theoretically desirable to avoid tumor cells spreading by surgical manipulation. Epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT) is associated with poor prognosis and an increased number of circulating tumor cells. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the effect of vascular division sequence and EMT on postoperative recurrence.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We retrospectively investigated tissue microarrays of 282 lung adenocarcinomas surgically resected between 2001 and 2007. We excluded the cases with segmentectomy, wedge resection, dissemination, insufficient material for staining, or lack of medical records. The effect of vascular division sequence and clinicopathologic factors on recurrence was evaluated in 195 cases.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The upfront pulmonary vein division (V-first) was performed in 60 patients, and the upfront pulmonary artery division (A-first) was performed in 135 patients. The recurrence was observed in 67 patients (13 in V-first and 54 in A-first). Epithelial-mesenchymal transition activation was observed in 104 patients. Multivariable analysis with 195 patients revealed that lymph node metastasis and pleural invasion were risk factors for the recurrence. The stratified multivariable analysis showed that vascular division sequence (A-first) was a risk factor only in the EMT-negative group (91 patients). In the EMT-negative subset, the 5-year relapse-free survival rate was significantly lower in the A-first group than the V-first group (72.6% vs. 92.2%, <i>p</i>  =  0.0136).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The upfront pulmonary artery division might be a risk factor in patients without EMT activation.</p>","PeriodicalId":35950,"journal":{"name":"ASIAN CARDIOVASCULAR & THORACIC ANNALS","volume":" ","pages":"123-132"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The impact of vascular division sequence and epithelial-mesenchymal transition status on postoperative recurrence in lung adenocarcinoma.\",\"authors\":\"Shigeto Nishikawa, Toshi Menju, Koji Takahashi, Terumasa Sowa, Akihiko Yoshizawa, Hiroshi Date\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/02184923241226468\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The vascular division sequence in video-assisted thoracic surgery (VATS) lung resection is usually determined by the handling difficulty due to the limited surgical view through the scope. However, upfront pulmonary vein division is theoretically desirable to avoid tumor cells spreading by surgical manipulation. Epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT) is associated with poor prognosis and an increased number of circulating tumor cells. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the effect of vascular division sequence and EMT on postoperative recurrence.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We retrospectively investigated tissue microarrays of 282 lung adenocarcinomas surgically resected between 2001 and 2007. We excluded the cases with segmentectomy, wedge resection, dissemination, insufficient material for staining, or lack of medical records. The effect of vascular division sequence and clinicopathologic factors on recurrence was evaluated in 195 cases.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The upfront pulmonary vein division (V-first) was performed in 60 patients, and the upfront pulmonary artery division (A-first) was performed in 135 patients. The recurrence was observed in 67 patients (13 in V-first and 54 in A-first). Epithelial-mesenchymal transition activation was observed in 104 patients. Multivariable analysis with 195 patients revealed that lymph node metastasis and pleural invasion were risk factors for the recurrence. The stratified multivariable analysis showed that vascular division sequence (A-first) was a risk factor only in the EMT-negative group (91 patients). In the EMT-negative subset, the 5-year relapse-free survival rate was significantly lower in the A-first group than the V-first group (72.6% vs. 92.2%, <i>p</i>  =  0.0136).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The upfront pulmonary artery division might be a risk factor in patients without EMT activation.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":35950,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ASIAN CARDIOVASCULAR & THORACIC ANNALS\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"123-132\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ASIAN CARDIOVASCULAR & THORACIC ANNALS\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/02184923241226468\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/1/22 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ASIAN CARDIOVASCULAR & THORACIC ANNALS","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/02184923241226468","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/22 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:视频辅助胸腔镜手术(VATS)肺切除术中的血管分割顺序通常由操作难度决定,因为手术视野受限于手术镜。然而,理论上前期肺静脉分割是可取的,以避免肿瘤细胞因手术操作而扩散。上皮-间质转化(EMT)与预后不良和循环肿瘤细胞数量增加有关。本研究旨在评估血管分裂顺序和 EMT 对术后复发的影响:我们对 2001 年至 2007 年间手术切除的 282 例肺腺癌的组织芯片进行了回顾性研究。我们排除了分段切除、楔形切除、播散、染色材料不足或缺乏医疗记录的病例。我们对195例病例的血管分割顺序和临床病理因素对复发的影响进行了评估:结果:60 例患者进行了前肺静脉分割(V-first),135 例患者进行了前肺动脉分割(A-first)。67例患者复发(V-first 13例,A-first 54例)。104名患者观察到上皮-间质转化激活。对195名患者进行的多变量分析显示,淋巴结转移和胸膜侵犯是导致复发的危险因素。分层多变量分析显示,血管分裂顺序(A先)仅是EMT阴性组(91名患者)的风险因素。在EMT阴性亚组中,A-first组的5年无复发生存率明显低于V-first组(72.6% vs. 92.2%,P = 0.0136):结论:前期肺动脉分割可能是未激活EMT患者的一个危险因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The impact of vascular division sequence and epithelial-mesenchymal transition status on postoperative recurrence in lung adenocarcinoma.

Background: The vascular division sequence in video-assisted thoracic surgery (VATS) lung resection is usually determined by the handling difficulty due to the limited surgical view through the scope. However, upfront pulmonary vein division is theoretically desirable to avoid tumor cells spreading by surgical manipulation. Epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT) is associated with poor prognosis and an increased number of circulating tumor cells. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the effect of vascular division sequence and EMT on postoperative recurrence.

Methods: We retrospectively investigated tissue microarrays of 282 lung adenocarcinomas surgically resected between 2001 and 2007. We excluded the cases with segmentectomy, wedge resection, dissemination, insufficient material for staining, or lack of medical records. The effect of vascular division sequence and clinicopathologic factors on recurrence was evaluated in 195 cases.

Results: The upfront pulmonary vein division (V-first) was performed in 60 patients, and the upfront pulmonary artery division (A-first) was performed in 135 patients. The recurrence was observed in 67 patients (13 in V-first and 54 in A-first). Epithelial-mesenchymal transition activation was observed in 104 patients. Multivariable analysis with 195 patients revealed that lymph node metastasis and pleural invasion were risk factors for the recurrence. The stratified multivariable analysis showed that vascular division sequence (A-first) was a risk factor only in the EMT-negative group (91 patients). In the EMT-negative subset, the 5-year relapse-free survival rate was significantly lower in the A-first group than the V-first group (72.6% vs. 92.2%, p  =  0.0136).

Conclusions: The upfront pulmonary artery division might be a risk factor in patients without EMT activation.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
78
期刊介绍: The Asian Cardiovascular and Thoracic Annals is an international peer-reviewed journal pertaining to cardiovascular and thoracic medicine. Besides original clinical manuscripts, we welcome research reports, product reviews, reports of new techniques, and findings of special significance to Asia and the Pacific Rim. Case studies that have significant novel original observations, are instructive, include adequate methodological details and provide conclusions. Workshop proceedings, meetings and book reviews, letters to the editor, and meeting announcements are encouraged along with relevant articles from authors.
期刊最新文献
Impact of preoperative computed tomography scan on neurological outcomes in coronary artery bypass grafting patients: A propensity-score analysis. Successful repair of infracardiac total anomalous pulmonary venous connection with nonconfluent bilateral pulmonary veins. Outcomes of fenestration versus none in extracardiac total cavopulmonary connection. Accidental finding of ALCAPA in a child with severe mitral regurgitation: A case study. Coronary arteriovenous fistula originating from the left coronary artery and draining into the superior vena cava.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1