ABGB 的概念

Jan Kabát
{"title":"ABGB 的概念","authors":"Jan Kabát","doi":"10.14712/2464689x.2023.51","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This contribution focuses on the development of the concept of the precarium from the beginning of its codification in the ABGB to the present day, focusing more closely on two historically established interpretations: the first adopted by Antonín Randa and developed by his student Josef Stupecký and the second adopted by the Austrian civilian Josef von Schey. Historically, these conceptions came into conflict in our territory during the recodification of the ABGB in interwar Czechoslovakia which is why the contribution discusses the development of the precarium also within the framework of the so-called Draft Civil Codes, all considering contemporary Austrian and Czechoslovak case-law. Finally, the contribution provides a concept in the form of contemporary Austrian law and its concept of precarium which is also relevant in the light of the fact that the ABGB provision on precarium has remained unchanged since 1811.","PeriodicalId":386369,"journal":{"name":"PRÁVNĚHISTORICKÉ STUDIE","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Pojetí výprosy podle ABGB\",\"authors\":\"Jan Kabát\",\"doi\":\"10.14712/2464689x.2023.51\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This contribution focuses on the development of the concept of the precarium from the beginning of its codification in the ABGB to the present day, focusing more closely on two historically established interpretations: the first adopted by Antonín Randa and developed by his student Josef Stupecký and the second adopted by the Austrian civilian Josef von Schey. Historically, these conceptions came into conflict in our territory during the recodification of the ABGB in interwar Czechoslovakia which is why the contribution discusses the development of the precarium also within the framework of the so-called Draft Civil Codes, all considering contemporary Austrian and Czechoslovak case-law. Finally, the contribution provides a concept in the form of contemporary Austrian law and its concept of precarium which is also relevant in the light of the fact that the ABGB provision on precarium has remained unchanged since 1811.\",\"PeriodicalId\":386369,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"PRÁVNĚHISTORICKÉ STUDIE\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"PRÁVNĚHISTORICKÉ STUDIE\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.14712/2464689x.2023.51\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"PRÁVNĚHISTORICKÉ STUDIE","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14712/2464689x.2023.51","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

这篇论文集中讨论了从开始编纂《捷克民法典》到现在的前置词概念的发展,并更密切地关注两种历史上确立的解释:第一种是由 Antonín Randa 采用并由其学生 Josef Stupecký 发展的解释,第二种是由奥地利平民 Josef von Schey 采用的解释。从历史上看,在战时捷克斯洛伐克重新编纂《民法典》期间,这些概念在我们的领土上发生了冲突,这就是为什么本论文还在所谓的《民法典草案》框架内讨论了前置词的发展,所有这些都考虑到了当代奥地利和捷克斯洛伐克的判例法。最后,该论文以当代奥地利法律及其预保金概念的形式提供了一个概念,鉴于《奥地利民法典》关于预保金的规定自 1811 年以来一直未变,该概念也具有相关性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Pojetí výprosy podle ABGB
This contribution focuses on the development of the concept of the precarium from the beginning of its codification in the ABGB to the present day, focusing more closely on two historically established interpretations: the first adopted by Antonín Randa and developed by his student Josef Stupecký and the second adopted by the Austrian civilian Josef von Schey. Historically, these conceptions came into conflict in our territory during the recodification of the ABGB in interwar Czechoslovakia which is why the contribution discusses the development of the precarium also within the framework of the so-called Draft Civil Codes, all considering contemporary Austrian and Czechoslovak case-law. Finally, the contribution provides a concept in the form of contemporary Austrian law and its concept of precarium which is also relevant in the light of the fact that the ABGB provision on precarium has remained unchanged since 1811.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Pojetí výprosy podle ABGB Knížecí spravedlnost. Soudnictví ve Valdštejnově Frýdlantském vévodství Zpráva z konference „Antonín Švehla, Alois Rašín a ti druzí“ Čo pre Slovákov znamenal a v súčasnosti znamená štátny sviatok Slovenského národného povstania? The Protection of Privacy Rights and Professional Secrecy in the First Czechoslovak Republic (1918–1938)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1