{"title":"利用现有的水电离常数公式评估水电离 ΔrHo、ΔrCpo、ΔrVo 的再现性","authors":"A. Plyasunov, Ilya A. Bugaev","doi":"10.1063/5.0180321","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Two correlations for the ionization constant of water, log10 Kw, over extended temperature and pressure/density ranges have been proposed in the literature: the Marshall–Franck and Bandura–Lvov formulations. The question remains how well these correlations reproduce the experimental values of ΔrHo, ΔrCpo, and ΔrVo, i.e., the standard changes of the enthalpy, heat capacity, and volume of reaction of water ionization. The answer to this question is the main goal of this communication. First, the analytical expressions for calculating ΔrHo, ΔrCpo, and ΔrVo were derived for the Marshall–Franck and Bandura–Lvov models. Then the calculated values of ΔrHo, ΔrCpo, and ΔrVo were compared with the experimental results from the literature. Although the performance of both correlating models can be termed satisfactory, they do not reproduce existing ΔrHo, ΔrCpo, and ΔrVo data within their expected uncertainties, contrary to the situation with log10 Kw. On the other hand, it appears that the potential for the quantitative reproduction of ΔrHo, ΔrCpo, and ΔrVo exists. It is suggested that the ΔrHo, ΔrCpo, and ΔrVo data should be included in the dataset for the global fit of data when developing formulations for log10 Kw.","PeriodicalId":16783,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Physical and Chemical Reference Data","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"An Assessment of Reproduction of ΔrHo, ΔrCpo, ΔrVo for Water Ionization with Existing Formulations for the Ionization Constant of Water\",\"authors\":\"A. Plyasunov, Ilya A. Bugaev\",\"doi\":\"10.1063/5.0180321\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Two correlations for the ionization constant of water, log10 Kw, over extended temperature and pressure/density ranges have been proposed in the literature: the Marshall–Franck and Bandura–Lvov formulations. The question remains how well these correlations reproduce the experimental values of ΔrHo, ΔrCpo, and ΔrVo, i.e., the standard changes of the enthalpy, heat capacity, and volume of reaction of water ionization. The answer to this question is the main goal of this communication. First, the analytical expressions for calculating ΔrHo, ΔrCpo, and ΔrVo were derived for the Marshall–Franck and Bandura–Lvov models. Then the calculated values of ΔrHo, ΔrCpo, and ΔrVo were compared with the experimental results from the literature. Although the performance of both correlating models can be termed satisfactory, they do not reproduce existing ΔrHo, ΔrCpo, and ΔrVo data within their expected uncertainties, contrary to the situation with log10 Kw. On the other hand, it appears that the potential for the quantitative reproduction of ΔrHo, ΔrCpo, and ΔrVo exists. It is suggested that the ΔrHo, ΔrCpo, and ΔrVo data should be included in the dataset for the global fit of data when developing formulations for log10 Kw.\",\"PeriodicalId\":16783,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Physical and Chemical Reference Data\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Physical and Chemical Reference Data\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0180321\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Physical and Chemical Reference Data","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0180321","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
An Assessment of Reproduction of ΔrHo, ΔrCpo, ΔrVo for Water Ionization with Existing Formulations for the Ionization Constant of Water
Two correlations for the ionization constant of water, log10 Kw, over extended temperature and pressure/density ranges have been proposed in the literature: the Marshall–Franck and Bandura–Lvov formulations. The question remains how well these correlations reproduce the experimental values of ΔrHo, ΔrCpo, and ΔrVo, i.e., the standard changes of the enthalpy, heat capacity, and volume of reaction of water ionization. The answer to this question is the main goal of this communication. First, the analytical expressions for calculating ΔrHo, ΔrCpo, and ΔrVo were derived for the Marshall–Franck and Bandura–Lvov models. Then the calculated values of ΔrHo, ΔrCpo, and ΔrVo were compared with the experimental results from the literature. Although the performance of both correlating models can be termed satisfactory, they do not reproduce existing ΔrHo, ΔrCpo, and ΔrVo data within their expected uncertainties, contrary to the situation with log10 Kw. On the other hand, it appears that the potential for the quantitative reproduction of ΔrHo, ΔrCpo, and ΔrVo exists. It is suggested that the ΔrHo, ΔrCpo, and ΔrVo data should be included in the dataset for the global fit of data when developing formulations for log10 Kw.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Physical and Chemical Reference Data (JPCRD) is published by AIP Publishing for the U.S. Department of Commerce National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST). The journal provides critically evaluated physical and chemical property data, fully documented as to the original sources and the criteria used for evaluation, preferably with uncertainty analysis. Critical reviews may also be included if they document a reference database, review the data situation in a field, review reference-quality measurement techniques, or review data evaluation methods.