{"title":"在染料释放实验中测量的各种拉格朗日表面漂移器的水追随性能","authors":"Rich Pawlowicz, C. Chavanne, Dany Dumont","doi":"10.1175/jtech-d-23-0073.1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nMany different surface drifter designs have been developed recently to track near-surface ocean currents, but the degree to which these drifters slip through the water because of mechanisms associated with the wind is poorly known. In the 2020 Tracer Release Experiment (TReX), 19 drifters of eight different designs, both commercially available and home-built, were simultaneously released with a patch of rhodamine dye. The dye rapidly spread vertically through the mixed layer but also more slowly dispersed horizontally. Although winds were light, drifters moved downwind from the dye patch at speeds of 3–17 cm s−1 (0.6%–4% of wind speed) depending on the design type. Measurements were made of wind and ocean conditions, and these were incorporated into a boundary layer model at the air–sea interface to estimate complete velocity profiles above and below the surface. Then, a steady-state drag model is used with these profiles to successfully predict drifter slip. Drogued drifters (those with a subsurface drag element) can be affected by Eulerian shear in the upper 0.5 m of the water column, as well as the Stokes drift, but undrogued drifters are in addition greatly affected by direct wind drag, and possibly by resonant interactions with waves. The dye, cycling vertically in the mixed layer, is largely unaffected by all of these factors; therefore, even “perfect” surface drifters do not move with a mixed layer tracer.\n\n\nSurface drifters are used by oceanographers to measure ocean surface currents. However, different designs also slip downwind through the water at rates that are poorly known but are typically around a few percent of the wind speed. In 2020 we simultaneously deployed drifters of eight different designs along with rhodamine dye in a field experiment to see how well the different designs track the water. Here we independently and successfully model drifter slippage for the different designs. Slip factors are then estimated for a range of wind and ocean conditions.","PeriodicalId":15074,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Atmospheric and Oceanic Technology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Water-Following Performance of Various Lagrangian Surface Drifters Measured in a Dye Release Experiment\",\"authors\":\"Rich Pawlowicz, C. Chavanne, Dany Dumont\",\"doi\":\"10.1175/jtech-d-23-0073.1\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\nMany different surface drifter designs have been developed recently to track near-surface ocean currents, but the degree to which these drifters slip through the water because of mechanisms associated with the wind is poorly known. In the 2020 Tracer Release Experiment (TReX), 19 drifters of eight different designs, both commercially available and home-built, were simultaneously released with a patch of rhodamine dye. The dye rapidly spread vertically through the mixed layer but also more slowly dispersed horizontally. Although winds were light, drifters moved downwind from the dye patch at speeds of 3–17 cm s−1 (0.6%–4% of wind speed) depending on the design type. Measurements were made of wind and ocean conditions, and these were incorporated into a boundary layer model at the air–sea interface to estimate complete velocity profiles above and below the surface. Then, a steady-state drag model is used with these profiles to successfully predict drifter slip. Drogued drifters (those with a subsurface drag element) can be affected by Eulerian shear in the upper 0.5 m of the water column, as well as the Stokes drift, but undrogued drifters are in addition greatly affected by direct wind drag, and possibly by resonant interactions with waves. The dye, cycling vertically in the mixed layer, is largely unaffected by all of these factors; therefore, even “perfect” surface drifters do not move with a mixed layer tracer.\\n\\n\\nSurface drifters are used by oceanographers to measure ocean surface currents. However, different designs also slip downwind through the water at rates that are poorly known but are typically around a few percent of the wind speed. In 2020 we simultaneously deployed drifters of eight different designs along with rhodamine dye in a field experiment to see how well the different designs track the water. Here we independently and successfully model drifter slippage for the different designs. Slip factors are then estimated for a range of wind and ocean conditions.\",\"PeriodicalId\":15074,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Atmospheric and Oceanic Technology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Atmospheric and Oceanic Technology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"89\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1175/jtech-d-23-0073.1\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"地球科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, OCEAN\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Atmospheric and Oceanic Technology","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1175/jtech-d-23-0073.1","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, OCEAN","Score":null,"Total":0}
The Water-Following Performance of Various Lagrangian Surface Drifters Measured in a Dye Release Experiment
Many different surface drifter designs have been developed recently to track near-surface ocean currents, but the degree to which these drifters slip through the water because of mechanisms associated with the wind is poorly known. In the 2020 Tracer Release Experiment (TReX), 19 drifters of eight different designs, both commercially available and home-built, were simultaneously released with a patch of rhodamine dye. The dye rapidly spread vertically through the mixed layer but also more slowly dispersed horizontally. Although winds were light, drifters moved downwind from the dye patch at speeds of 3–17 cm s−1 (0.6%–4% of wind speed) depending on the design type. Measurements were made of wind and ocean conditions, and these were incorporated into a boundary layer model at the air–sea interface to estimate complete velocity profiles above and below the surface. Then, a steady-state drag model is used with these profiles to successfully predict drifter slip. Drogued drifters (those with a subsurface drag element) can be affected by Eulerian shear in the upper 0.5 m of the water column, as well as the Stokes drift, but undrogued drifters are in addition greatly affected by direct wind drag, and possibly by resonant interactions with waves. The dye, cycling vertically in the mixed layer, is largely unaffected by all of these factors; therefore, even “perfect” surface drifters do not move with a mixed layer tracer.
Surface drifters are used by oceanographers to measure ocean surface currents. However, different designs also slip downwind through the water at rates that are poorly known but are typically around a few percent of the wind speed. In 2020 we simultaneously deployed drifters of eight different designs along with rhodamine dye in a field experiment to see how well the different designs track the water. Here we independently and successfully model drifter slippage for the different designs. Slip factors are then estimated for a range of wind and ocean conditions.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Atmospheric and Oceanic Technology (JTECH) publishes research describing instrumentation and methods used in atmospheric and oceanic research, including remote sensing instruments; measurements, validation, and data analysis techniques from satellites, aircraft, balloons, and surface-based platforms; in situ instruments, measurements, and methods for data acquisition, analysis, and interpretation and assimilation in numerical models; and information systems and algorithms.