Hangnyoung Choi, Jae Han Kim, Hee Sang Yang, Jong Yeob Kim, Samuele Cortese, Lee Smith, Ai Koyanagi, Elena Dragioti, Joaquim Radua, Paolo Fusar-Poli, Jae Il Shin, Keun-Ah Cheon, Marco Solmi
{"title":"针对自闭症谱系障碍易激惹性的药物和非药物干预:采用 GRADE 评估方法进行的系统综述和荟萃分析。","authors":"Hangnyoung Choi, Jae Han Kim, Hee Sang Yang, Jong Yeob Kim, Samuele Cortese, Lee Smith, Ai Koyanagi, Elena Dragioti, Joaquim Radua, Paolo Fusar-Poli, Jae Il Shin, Keun-Ah Cheon, Marco Solmi","doi":"10.1186/s13229-024-00585-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Numerous interventions for irritability in autism spectrum disorder (ASD) have been investigated. We aimed to appraise the magnitude of pharmacological and non-pharmacological interventions for irritability in ASD without any restrictions in terms of eligible interventions.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We systematically searched PubMed/MEDLINE, Scopus, and Web of Science until April 15, 2023. We included randomized controlled trials (RCTs) with a parallel design that examined the efficacy of interventions for the treatment of irritability in patients of any age with ASD without any restrictions in terms of eligible interventions. We performed a random-effects meta-analysis by pooling effect sizes as Hedges' g. We classified assessed interventions as follows: pharmacological monotherapy, risperidone plus adjuvant therapy versus risperidone monotherapy, non-pharmacological intervention, and dietary intervention. We utilized the Cochrane tool to evaluate the risk of bias in each study and the GRADE approach to assess the certainty of evidence for each meta-analyzed intervention.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Out of 5640 references, we identified 60 eligible articles with 45 different kinds of interventions, including 3531 participants, of which 80.9% were males (mean age [SD] = 8.79 [3.85]). For pharmacological monotherapy, risperidone (Hedges' g - 0.857, 95% CI - 1.263 to - 0.451, certainty of evidence: high) and aripiprazole (Hedges' g - 0.559, 95% CI - 0.767 to - 0.351, certainty of evidence: high) outperformed placebo. Among the non-pharmacological interventions, parent training (Hedges' g - 0.893, 95% CI - 1.184 to - 0.602, certainty of evidence: moderate) showed a significant result. None of the meta-analyzed interventions yielded significant effects among risperidone + adjuvant therapy and dietary supplementation. However, several novel molecules in augmentation to risperidone outperformed risperidone monotherapy, yet from one RCT each.</p><p><strong>Limitations: </strong>First, various tools have been utilized to measure the irritability in ASD, which may contribute to the heterogeneity of the outcomes. Second, meta-analyses for each intervention included only a small number of studies and participants.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Only risperidone, aripiprazole among pharmacological interventions, and parent training among non-pharmacological interventions can be recommended for irritability in ASD. As an augmentation to risperidone, several novel treatments show promising effects, but further RCTs are needed to replicate findings. Trial registration PROSPERO, CRD42021243965.</p>","PeriodicalId":18733,"journal":{"name":"Molecular Autism","volume":"15 1","pages":"7"},"PeriodicalIF":6.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10807060/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Pharmacological and non-pharmacological interventions for irritability in autism spectrum disorder: a systematic review and meta-analysis with the GRADE assessment.\",\"authors\":\"Hangnyoung Choi, Jae Han Kim, Hee Sang Yang, Jong Yeob Kim, Samuele Cortese, Lee Smith, Ai Koyanagi, Elena Dragioti, Joaquim Radua, Paolo Fusar-Poli, Jae Il Shin, Keun-Ah Cheon, Marco Solmi\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s13229-024-00585-6\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Numerous interventions for irritability in autism spectrum disorder (ASD) have been investigated. We aimed to appraise the magnitude of pharmacological and non-pharmacological interventions for irritability in ASD without any restrictions in terms of eligible interventions.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We systematically searched PubMed/MEDLINE, Scopus, and Web of Science until April 15, 2023. We included randomized controlled trials (RCTs) with a parallel design that examined the efficacy of interventions for the treatment of irritability in patients of any age with ASD without any restrictions in terms of eligible interventions. We performed a random-effects meta-analysis by pooling effect sizes as Hedges' g. We classified assessed interventions as follows: pharmacological monotherapy, risperidone plus adjuvant therapy versus risperidone monotherapy, non-pharmacological intervention, and dietary intervention. We utilized the Cochrane tool to evaluate the risk of bias in each study and the GRADE approach to assess the certainty of evidence for each meta-analyzed intervention.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Out of 5640 references, we identified 60 eligible articles with 45 different kinds of interventions, including 3531 participants, of which 80.9% were males (mean age [SD] = 8.79 [3.85]). For pharmacological monotherapy, risperidone (Hedges' g - 0.857, 95% CI - 1.263 to - 0.451, certainty of evidence: high) and aripiprazole (Hedges' g - 0.559, 95% CI - 0.767 to - 0.351, certainty of evidence: high) outperformed placebo. Among the non-pharmacological interventions, parent training (Hedges' g - 0.893, 95% CI - 1.184 to - 0.602, certainty of evidence: moderate) showed a significant result. None of the meta-analyzed interventions yielded significant effects among risperidone + adjuvant therapy and dietary supplementation. However, several novel molecules in augmentation to risperidone outperformed risperidone monotherapy, yet from one RCT each.</p><p><strong>Limitations: </strong>First, various tools have been utilized to measure the irritability in ASD, which may contribute to the heterogeneity of the outcomes. Second, meta-analyses for each intervention included only a small number of studies and participants.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Only risperidone, aripiprazole among pharmacological interventions, and parent training among non-pharmacological interventions can be recommended for irritability in ASD. As an augmentation to risperidone, several novel treatments show promising effects, but further RCTs are needed to replicate findings. Trial registration PROSPERO, CRD42021243965.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":18733,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Molecular Autism\",\"volume\":\"15 1\",\"pages\":\"7\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10807060/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Molecular Autism\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13229-024-00585-6\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"GENETICS & HEREDITY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Molecular Autism","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13229-024-00585-6","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GENETICS & HEREDITY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景:针对自闭症谱系障碍(ASD)易激惹性的许多干预措施已得到研究。我们的目的是评估针对自闭症谱系障碍易激惹性的药物和非药物干预措施的效果,对符合条件的干预措施不作任何限制:我们系统地检索了 PubMed/MEDLINE、Scopus 和 Web of Science,直至 2023 年 4 月 15 日。我们纳入了采用平行设计的随机对照试验(RCT),这些试验研究了治疗任何年龄段 ASD 患者易激惹性的干预措施的疗效,对符合条件的干预措施没有任何限制。我们将评估的干预措施分为以下几类:药物单一疗法、利培酮加辅助疗法与利培酮单一疗法、非药物干预和饮食干预。我们使用 Cochrane 工具评估了每项研究的偏倚风险,并使用 GRADE 方法评估了每项荟萃分析干预措施的证据确定性:在 5640 篇参考文献中,我们发现了 60 篇符合条件的文章,涉及 45 种不同的干预措施,包括 3531 名参与者,其中 80.9% 为男性(平均年龄 [SD] = 8.79 [3.85])。在单一药物疗法中,利培酮(Hedges' g - 0.857,95% CI - 1.263 to - 0.451,证据确定性:高)和阿立哌唑(Hedges' g - 0.559,95% CI - 0.767 to - 0.351,证据确定性:高)的疗效优于安慰剂。在非药物干预中,家长培训(Hedges' g - 0.893,95% CI - 1.184 to - 0.602,证据确定性:中)的效果显著。在利培酮+辅助疗法和膳食补充剂中,没有一项荟萃分析干预措施产生了显著效果。然而,在利培酮的辅助治疗中,几种新型分子药物的疗效优于利培酮单药治疗,但每种药物均来自一项研究:局限性:首先,测量ASD易激惹性的工具多种多样,这可能会导致结果的异质性。其次,每种干预措施的荟萃分析仅包括少量研究和参与者:结论:药物干预中只有利培酮、阿立哌唑和非药物干预中的家长培训可用于治疗ASD的易激惹性。作为利培酮的辅助治疗,几种新型疗法显示出了良好的效果,但还需要进一步的RCT研究来验证研究结果。试验注册PROSPERO,CRD42021243965。
Pharmacological and non-pharmacological interventions for irritability in autism spectrum disorder: a systematic review and meta-analysis with the GRADE assessment.
Background: Numerous interventions for irritability in autism spectrum disorder (ASD) have been investigated. We aimed to appraise the magnitude of pharmacological and non-pharmacological interventions for irritability in ASD without any restrictions in terms of eligible interventions.
Methods: We systematically searched PubMed/MEDLINE, Scopus, and Web of Science until April 15, 2023. We included randomized controlled trials (RCTs) with a parallel design that examined the efficacy of interventions for the treatment of irritability in patients of any age with ASD without any restrictions in terms of eligible interventions. We performed a random-effects meta-analysis by pooling effect sizes as Hedges' g. We classified assessed interventions as follows: pharmacological monotherapy, risperidone plus adjuvant therapy versus risperidone monotherapy, non-pharmacological intervention, and dietary intervention. We utilized the Cochrane tool to evaluate the risk of bias in each study and the GRADE approach to assess the certainty of evidence for each meta-analyzed intervention.
Results: Out of 5640 references, we identified 60 eligible articles with 45 different kinds of interventions, including 3531 participants, of which 80.9% were males (mean age [SD] = 8.79 [3.85]). For pharmacological monotherapy, risperidone (Hedges' g - 0.857, 95% CI - 1.263 to - 0.451, certainty of evidence: high) and aripiprazole (Hedges' g - 0.559, 95% CI - 0.767 to - 0.351, certainty of evidence: high) outperformed placebo. Among the non-pharmacological interventions, parent training (Hedges' g - 0.893, 95% CI - 1.184 to - 0.602, certainty of evidence: moderate) showed a significant result. None of the meta-analyzed interventions yielded significant effects among risperidone + adjuvant therapy and dietary supplementation. However, several novel molecules in augmentation to risperidone outperformed risperidone monotherapy, yet from one RCT each.
Limitations: First, various tools have been utilized to measure the irritability in ASD, which may contribute to the heterogeneity of the outcomes. Second, meta-analyses for each intervention included only a small number of studies and participants.
Conclusions: Only risperidone, aripiprazole among pharmacological interventions, and parent training among non-pharmacological interventions can be recommended for irritability in ASD. As an augmentation to risperidone, several novel treatments show promising effects, but further RCTs are needed to replicate findings. Trial registration PROSPERO, CRD42021243965.
期刊介绍:
Molecular Autism is a peer-reviewed, open access journal that publishes high-quality basic, translational and clinical research that has relevance to the etiology, pathobiology, or treatment of autism and related neurodevelopmental conditions. Research that includes integration across levels is encouraged. Molecular Autism publishes empirical studies, reviews, and brief communications.