在慢性伤口培养过程中保持微生物二维组织的新型取样技术:印记法

IF 2.2 4区 医学 Q4 IMMUNOLOGY Apmis Pub Date : 2024-01-25 DOI:10.1111/apm.13372
Anne Kristine Servais Iversen, Blaine Gabriel Fritz, Mads Joachim Hansen, Klaus Kirketerp-Møller, Tim Holm Jakobsen, Thomas Bjarnsholt, Mads Lichtenberg
{"title":"在慢性伤口培养过程中保持微生物二维组织的新型取样技术:印记法","authors":"Anne Kristine Servais Iversen,&nbsp;Blaine Gabriel Fritz,&nbsp;Mads Joachim Hansen,&nbsp;Klaus Kirketerp-Møller,&nbsp;Tim Holm Jakobsen,&nbsp;Thomas Bjarnsholt,&nbsp;Mads Lichtenberg","doi":"10.1111/apm.13372","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>This study aimed to develop and validate “the Imprint method,”, a technique for sampling microbes from chronic wounds while preserving their two-dimensional spatial organization. We used nylon filters to sample bacteria and compared with sampling using Eswabs in 12 patients. The Imprint method identified a mean of 0.93 unique species more than Eswab (4.3 ± 2.2 and 3.4 ± 1.4 unique species, respectively; mean ± SD; n = 30). Accuracy between the Eswab and the Imprint method was 93.2% and in cases of disagreement between methods, Imprint had a higher sensitivity in 6/8 of the most prevalent species. <i>In vitro</i> validation confirmed that the Imprint method could transfer bacterial colonies while replicating their two-dimensional organization and the area covered by bacteria on the plate sampled. Clinical testing demonstrated that the imprint method is a rapid and feasible technique that identified more unique bacterial species than Eswab with a good agreement between methods but that Imprint was better at detecting important pathogens such as <i>Staphylococcus aureus</i> and <i>Pseudomonas aeruginosa</i>. The Imprint method is a novel technique that cultures and records the two-dimensional organization of microbes, providing an alternative or supplement to conventional surface culture using Eswab.</p>","PeriodicalId":8167,"journal":{"name":"Apmis","volume":"132 3","pages":"210-220"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/apm.13372","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Novel sampling technique maintaining the two-dimensional organization of microbes during cultivation from chronic wounds: The Imprint method\",\"authors\":\"Anne Kristine Servais Iversen,&nbsp;Blaine Gabriel Fritz,&nbsp;Mads Joachim Hansen,&nbsp;Klaus Kirketerp-Møller,&nbsp;Tim Holm Jakobsen,&nbsp;Thomas Bjarnsholt,&nbsp;Mads Lichtenberg\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/apm.13372\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>This study aimed to develop and validate “the Imprint method,”, a technique for sampling microbes from chronic wounds while preserving their two-dimensional spatial organization. We used nylon filters to sample bacteria and compared with sampling using Eswabs in 12 patients. The Imprint method identified a mean of 0.93 unique species more than Eswab (4.3 ± 2.2 and 3.4 ± 1.4 unique species, respectively; mean ± SD; n = 30). Accuracy between the Eswab and the Imprint method was 93.2% and in cases of disagreement between methods, Imprint had a higher sensitivity in 6/8 of the most prevalent species. <i>In vitro</i> validation confirmed that the Imprint method could transfer bacterial colonies while replicating their two-dimensional organization and the area covered by bacteria on the plate sampled. Clinical testing demonstrated that the imprint method is a rapid and feasible technique that identified more unique bacterial species than Eswab with a good agreement between methods but that Imprint was better at detecting important pathogens such as <i>Staphylococcus aureus</i> and <i>Pseudomonas aeruginosa</i>. The Imprint method is a novel technique that cultures and records the two-dimensional organization of microbes, providing an alternative or supplement to conventional surface culture using Eswab.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8167,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Apmis\",\"volume\":\"132 3\",\"pages\":\"210-220\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/apm.13372\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Apmis\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/apm.13372\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"IMMUNOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Apmis","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/apm.13372","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"IMMUNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究旨在开发和验证 "印记法",这是一种从慢性伤口中采集微生物样本并保留其二维空间组织的技术。我们使用尼龙过滤器对细菌进行采样,并与在 12 名患者中使用 Eswabs 进行采样进行比较。Imprint法比Eswab法平均多鉴定出0.93个独特菌种(分别为4.3 ± 2.2和3.4 ± 1.4个独特菌种;平均值 ± SD;n = 30)。Eswab 和 Imprint 方法的准确度为 93.2%,在两种方法出现分歧的情况下,Imprint 对 6/8 最常见物种的灵敏度更高。体外验证证实,Imprint 方法可以转移细菌菌落,同时复制其二维组织和取样平板上细菌覆盖的面积。临床测试表明,Imprint 方法是一种快速可行的技术,与 Eswab 相比,它能鉴定出更多独特的细菌种类,而且两种方法之间的一致性很好,但 Imprint 在检测金黄色葡萄球菌和铜绿假单胞菌等重要病原体方面更胜一筹。Imprint方法是一种培养和记录微生物二维组织的新型技术,可替代或补充使用Eswab的传统表面培养方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Novel sampling technique maintaining the two-dimensional organization of microbes during cultivation from chronic wounds: The Imprint method

This study aimed to develop and validate “the Imprint method,”, a technique for sampling microbes from chronic wounds while preserving their two-dimensional spatial organization. We used nylon filters to sample bacteria and compared with sampling using Eswabs in 12 patients. The Imprint method identified a mean of 0.93 unique species more than Eswab (4.3 ± 2.2 and 3.4 ± 1.4 unique species, respectively; mean ± SD; n = 30). Accuracy between the Eswab and the Imprint method was 93.2% and in cases of disagreement between methods, Imprint had a higher sensitivity in 6/8 of the most prevalent species. In vitro validation confirmed that the Imprint method could transfer bacterial colonies while replicating their two-dimensional organization and the area covered by bacteria on the plate sampled. Clinical testing demonstrated that the imprint method is a rapid and feasible technique that identified more unique bacterial species than Eswab with a good agreement between methods but that Imprint was better at detecting important pathogens such as Staphylococcus aureus and Pseudomonas aeruginosa. The Imprint method is a novel technique that cultures and records the two-dimensional organization of microbes, providing an alternative or supplement to conventional surface culture using Eswab.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Apmis
Apmis 医学-病理学
CiteScore
5.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
91
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: APMIS, formerly Acta Pathologica, Microbiologica et Immunologica Scandinavica, has been published since 1924 by the Scandinavian Societies for Medical Microbiology and Pathology as a non-profit-making scientific journal.
期刊最新文献
Single cells and bacterial biofilm populations in chronic wound infections. Vaginal microecology and its role in human papillomavirus infection and human papillomavirus associated cervical lesions. Metabolic drives affecting Th17/Treg gene expression changes and differentiation: impact on immune-microenvironment regulation. Bacterial aerobic respiration is a major consumer of oxygen in sputum from patients with acute lower respiratory tract infection. Unraveling the intricacies of cancer-associated fibroblasts: a comprehensive review on metabolic reprogramming and tumor microenvironment crosstalk.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1