心肺旁路术后术中抢救血液与凝血功能障碍之间的关系。

IF 0.8 Q3 ANESTHESIOLOGY JA Clinical Reports Pub Date : 2024-01-25 DOI:10.1186/s40981-024-00689-1
Masahiro Morinaga, Kenji Yoshitani, Soshiro Ogata, Satsuki Fukushima, Hitoshi Matsuda
{"title":"心肺旁路术后术中抢救血液与凝血功能障碍之间的关系。","authors":"Masahiro Morinaga, Kenji Yoshitani, Soshiro Ogata, Satsuki Fukushima, Hitoshi Matsuda","doi":"10.1186/s40981-024-00689-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>This study investigated whether intraoperative blood salvage was associated with coagulation disorder diagnosed by conventional coagulation tests and thromboelastography (TEG) after cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB).</p><p><strong>Study design and methods: </strong>This was a prospective, observational study. Ninety-two patients who underwent cardiovascular surgery with CPB were enrolled. We evaluated coagulation function in patients with or without cell salvage blood transfusion at the following time points: before CPB, just after protamine administration, and 1 h after protamine administration. We evaluated platelet count, fibrinogen concentration, and TEG parameters. Patients were considered to have coagulation disorder if one or more of the following criteria were present: (1) residual heparin, (2) low platelet count, (3) low fibrinogen level, (4) low clotting factor level, and (5) hyperfibrinolysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Fifty-three of 92 patients (57.6%) received intraoperative cell salvage. Coagulation disorder was observed in 56 of 92 patients (60.9%) after CPB. There was no significant difference between patients with or without intraoperative blood salvage in terms of the incidence of coagulation disorder (p = 0.542) or the total volume of blood from the drain after CPB (p = 0.437). Intraoperative blood salvage was not associated with coagulation disorder diagnosed by either TEG or conventional coagulation tests (odds ratio 1.329, 95% confidence interval: 0.549-3.213, p = 0.547). There were no significant interactions between patients with or without intraoperative blood salvage regarding coagulation parameters derived from TEG.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The incidence of coagulation disorder and the total blood volume from the drain after CPB did not differ significantly between patients with or without intraoperative blood salvage.</p>","PeriodicalId":14635,"journal":{"name":"JA Clinical Reports","volume":"10 1","pages":"5"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10810763/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Association between intraoperative blood salvage and coagulation disorder after cardiopulmonary bypass.\",\"authors\":\"Masahiro Morinaga, Kenji Yoshitani, Soshiro Ogata, Satsuki Fukushima, Hitoshi Matsuda\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s40981-024-00689-1\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>This study investigated whether intraoperative blood salvage was associated with coagulation disorder diagnosed by conventional coagulation tests and thromboelastography (TEG) after cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB).</p><p><strong>Study design and methods: </strong>This was a prospective, observational study. Ninety-two patients who underwent cardiovascular surgery with CPB were enrolled. We evaluated coagulation function in patients with or without cell salvage blood transfusion at the following time points: before CPB, just after protamine administration, and 1 h after protamine administration. We evaluated platelet count, fibrinogen concentration, and TEG parameters. Patients were considered to have coagulation disorder if one or more of the following criteria were present: (1) residual heparin, (2) low platelet count, (3) low fibrinogen level, (4) low clotting factor level, and (5) hyperfibrinolysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Fifty-three of 92 patients (57.6%) received intraoperative cell salvage. Coagulation disorder was observed in 56 of 92 patients (60.9%) after CPB. There was no significant difference between patients with or without intraoperative blood salvage in terms of the incidence of coagulation disorder (p = 0.542) or the total volume of blood from the drain after CPB (p = 0.437). Intraoperative blood salvage was not associated with coagulation disorder diagnosed by either TEG or conventional coagulation tests (odds ratio 1.329, 95% confidence interval: 0.549-3.213, p = 0.547). There were no significant interactions between patients with or without intraoperative blood salvage regarding coagulation parameters derived from TEG.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The incidence of coagulation disorder and the total blood volume from the drain after CPB did not differ significantly between patients with or without intraoperative blood salvage.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14635,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"JA Clinical Reports\",\"volume\":\"10 1\",\"pages\":\"5\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10810763/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"JA Clinical Reports\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s40981-024-00689-1\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ANESTHESIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JA Clinical Reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s40981-024-00689-1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:本研究探讨了心肺旁路术(CPB)后,术中血液抢救是否与通过常规凝血测试和血栓弹性成像(TEG)诊断出的凝血功能障碍有关:这是一项前瞻性观察研究。研究设计:这是一项前瞻性观察研究,共纳入了 92 名使用 CPB 进行心血管手术的患者。我们在以下时间点对接受或未接受细胞挽救输血的患者的凝血功能进行了评估:CPB 前、使用原胺后和使用原胺后 1 小时。我们评估了血小板计数、纤维蛋白原浓度和 TEG 参数。如果存在以下一个或多个标准,则认为患者存在凝血功能障碍:(1)肝素残留;(2)血小板计数低;(3)纤维蛋白原水平低;(4)凝血因子水平低;(5)纤溶亢进:92 例患者中有 53 例(57.6%)接受了术中细胞挽救。92 例患者中有 56 例(60.9%)在 CPB 后出现凝血障碍。就凝血障碍发生率(P = 0.542)或 CPB 后引流管总血量(P = 0.437)而言,接受或未接受术中血液挽救的患者之间无明显差异。术中血液抢救与通过 TEG 或传统凝血测试诊断出的凝血功能障碍无关(几率比 1.329,95% 置信区间:0.549-3.213,p = 0.547)。通过 TEG 得出的凝血参数在有无术中血液挽救的患者之间没有明显的相互作用:结论:CPB术后凝血功能障碍的发生率和引流管总血量在有无术中血液抢救的患者之间没有明显差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Association between intraoperative blood salvage and coagulation disorder after cardiopulmonary bypass.

Background: This study investigated whether intraoperative blood salvage was associated with coagulation disorder diagnosed by conventional coagulation tests and thromboelastography (TEG) after cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB).

Study design and methods: This was a prospective, observational study. Ninety-two patients who underwent cardiovascular surgery with CPB were enrolled. We evaluated coagulation function in patients with or without cell salvage blood transfusion at the following time points: before CPB, just after protamine administration, and 1 h after protamine administration. We evaluated platelet count, fibrinogen concentration, and TEG parameters. Patients were considered to have coagulation disorder if one or more of the following criteria were present: (1) residual heparin, (2) low platelet count, (3) low fibrinogen level, (4) low clotting factor level, and (5) hyperfibrinolysis.

Results: Fifty-three of 92 patients (57.6%) received intraoperative cell salvage. Coagulation disorder was observed in 56 of 92 patients (60.9%) after CPB. There was no significant difference between patients with or without intraoperative blood salvage in terms of the incidence of coagulation disorder (p = 0.542) or the total volume of blood from the drain after CPB (p = 0.437). Intraoperative blood salvage was not associated with coagulation disorder diagnosed by either TEG or conventional coagulation tests (odds ratio 1.329, 95% confidence interval: 0.549-3.213, p = 0.547). There were no significant interactions between patients with or without intraoperative blood salvage regarding coagulation parameters derived from TEG.

Conclusions: The incidence of coagulation disorder and the total blood volume from the drain after CPB did not differ significantly between patients with or without intraoperative blood salvage.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
JA Clinical Reports
JA Clinical Reports ANESTHESIOLOGY-
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
90
审稿时长
9 weeks
期刊介绍: JA Clinical Reports is a companion journal to the Journal of Anesthesia (JA), the official journal of the Japanese Society of Anesthesiologists (JSA). This journal is an open access, peer-reviewed, online journal related to clinical anesthesia practices such as anesthesia management, pain management and intensive care. Case reports are very important articles from the viewpoint of education and the cultivation of scientific thinking in the field of anesthesia. However, submissions of anesthesia research and clinical reports from Japan are notably decreasing in major anesthesia journals. Therefore, the JSA has decided to launch a new journal, JA Clinical Reports, to encourage JSA members, particularly junior Japanese anesthesiologists, to publish papers in English language.
期刊最新文献
Delay in detection of urethral catheter misplacement in the vagina of an older adult patient due to urinary outflow during catheterization: a case report. Unexpected negative-pressure pulmonary edema after tracheostomy: two case reports. Appropriate shape of a stylet for tracheal intubation using the McGrath® MAC videolaryngoscope in neonates: a randomized crossover simulation study. Markedly elevated blood pressure, tachycardia, and altered consciousness in patients with bacteremia during transurethral surgeries: two case reports. Maximum oxygenation during surgical abortion with sedatives and analgesics - a simple suggestion from an anesthesiological perspective.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1