金钱的起源:动机与沉淀模型(MSM)分析

IF 0.9 3区 社会学 0 HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Semiotica Pub Date : 2024-01-22 DOI:10.1515/sem-2023-0031
Todd Oakley, Jordan Zlatev
{"title":"金钱的起源:动机与沉淀模型(MSM)分析","authors":"Todd Oakley, Jordan Zlatev","doi":"10.1515/sem-2023-0031","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Few other social technologies and institutions are more consequential to human societies than money. Yet money remains a deeply perplexing phenomenon. On the one hand, it is a pan-human system of valuation, but on the other, it is conventional and variable in its uses. While it is controversial if money instantiates a fully-fledged sign system, it is rife with semiotic capacities. To present an illuminating analysis of money is thus a test case for the Motivation & Sedimentation Model (MSM) of meaning making, with roots in the phenomenology of Husserl and Merleau-Ponty. Using MSM, we analyze two origin accounts of money: the commodity money account evidenced in archaic and classical Greek coinage, and the credit money account exemplified by early findings in Mesopotamia. Both accounts focus on the interactions between the three levels of MSM: the pre-signitive Embodied, the cultural Sedimented, and the interactional Situated levels of meaning and propose different series of “loops” to account for the genesis of money. Despite key differences in the two origins, both imply semiotic processes operating according to motivated, and hence non-arbitrary, conventions developing within institutional formations that ultimately influence present day concepts of money.","PeriodicalId":47288,"journal":{"name":"Semiotica","volume":"34 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Origins of money: a Motivation & Sedimentation Model (MSM) analysis\",\"authors\":\"Todd Oakley, Jordan Zlatev\",\"doi\":\"10.1515/sem-2023-0031\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Few other social technologies and institutions are more consequential to human societies than money. Yet money remains a deeply perplexing phenomenon. On the one hand, it is a pan-human system of valuation, but on the other, it is conventional and variable in its uses. While it is controversial if money instantiates a fully-fledged sign system, it is rife with semiotic capacities. To present an illuminating analysis of money is thus a test case for the Motivation & Sedimentation Model (MSM) of meaning making, with roots in the phenomenology of Husserl and Merleau-Ponty. Using MSM, we analyze two origin accounts of money: the commodity money account evidenced in archaic and classical Greek coinage, and the credit money account exemplified by early findings in Mesopotamia. Both accounts focus on the interactions between the three levels of MSM: the pre-signitive Embodied, the cultural Sedimented, and the interactional Situated levels of meaning and propose different series of “loops” to account for the genesis of money. Despite key differences in the two origins, both imply semiotic processes operating according to motivated, and hence non-arbitrary, conventions developing within institutional formations that ultimately influence present day concepts of money.\",\"PeriodicalId\":47288,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Semiotica\",\"volume\":\"34 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Semiotica\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1515/sem-2023-0031\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Semiotica","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/sem-2023-0031","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

很少有其他社会技术和制度比货币对人类社会的影响更大。然而,货币仍然是一个令人困惑的现象。一方面,它是一个泛人类的估价系统,但另一方面,它的用途又是传统而多变的。虽然货币是否是一个完全成熟的符号系统尚存争议,但它却充满了符号学的能力。因此,对货币的启发性分析是对意义生成的 "动机& 沉淀模型"(MSM)的一个测试案例,该模型源于胡塞尔和梅洛-庞蒂的现象学。利用 MSM,我们分析了货币的两种起源说法:古希腊和古典钱币中的商品货币说法,以及美索不达米亚早期发现中的信用货币说法。这两种说法都关注澳门金沙线上领彩金网三个层面的互动:前符号化(pre-signitive Embodied)、文化沉积(cultural Sedimented)和互动情境(interactive Situated)层面的意义,并提出了一系列不同的 "循环 "来解释货币的起源。尽管两种起源存在关键差异,但两者都意味着符号学过程是根据在制度形式中发展起来的、有动机的、因而非任意的惯例运作的,这些惯例最终影响了当今的货币概念。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Origins of money: a Motivation & Sedimentation Model (MSM) analysis
Few other social technologies and institutions are more consequential to human societies than money. Yet money remains a deeply perplexing phenomenon. On the one hand, it is a pan-human system of valuation, but on the other, it is conventional and variable in its uses. While it is controversial if money instantiates a fully-fledged sign system, it is rife with semiotic capacities. To present an illuminating analysis of money is thus a test case for the Motivation & Sedimentation Model (MSM) of meaning making, with roots in the phenomenology of Husserl and Merleau-Ponty. Using MSM, we analyze two origin accounts of money: the commodity money account evidenced in archaic and classical Greek coinage, and the credit money account exemplified by early findings in Mesopotamia. Both accounts focus on the interactions between the three levels of MSM: the pre-signitive Embodied, the cultural Sedimented, and the interactional Situated levels of meaning and propose different series of “loops” to account for the genesis of money. Despite key differences in the two origins, both imply semiotic processes operating according to motivated, and hence non-arbitrary, conventions developing within institutional formations that ultimately influence present day concepts of money.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Semiotica
Semiotica Multiple-
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
37.50%
发文量
65
期刊介绍: Semiotica, the Journal of the International Association for Semiotic Studies, founded in 1969, appears in five volumes of four issues per year, in two languages (English and French), and occasionally in German. Semiotica features articles reporting results of research in all branches of semiotic studies, in-depth reviews of selected current literature in this field, and occasional guest editorials and reports. From time to time, Special Issues, devoted to topics of particular interest, are assembled by Guest Editors. The publishers of Semiotica offer an annual prize, the Mouton d"Or, to the author of the best article each year. The article is selected by an independent international jury.
期刊最新文献
An edusemiotic approach to teaching intonation in the context of English language teacher education Cultural semiotics for mathematical discourses Cultivating critical language awareness: unraveling populism in Trump’s inaugural address Computer creates a cat: sign formation, glitching, and the AImage Ethnosemantic analysis of binary oppositions in toposystems
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1