强化方法论,减轻在管理创新项目中应用参与式行动研究的挑战

IF 2.3 4区 管理学 Q3 BUSINESS International Journal of Managing Projects in Business Pub Date : 2024-01-25 DOI:10.1108/ijmpb-01-2023-0024
Mohammad Mehrabioun Mohammadi
{"title":"强化方法论,减轻在管理创新项目中应用参与式行动研究的挑战","authors":"Mohammad Mehrabioun Mohammadi","doi":"10.1108/ijmpb-01-2023-0024","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<h3>Purpose</h3>\n<p>This research aims to examine the challenges of recruiting participatory action research (PAR) in managing innovation projects. An enhanced methodology based on PAR was developed to mitigate the challenges related to recruiting PAR in managing innovation projects. The proposed methodology was evaluated by comparing it to established methodologies/frameworks such as Scrum, Design Thinking (DT) and The Lean Startup (TLS). The evaluation aimed to determine the advantages and limitations of the proposed methodology in managing innovation projects.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Design/methodology/approach</h3>\n<p>The proposed enhanced methodology consists of eight steps, ranging from developing an understanding of the industry and business structure to learning and knowledge management. In addition, the enhanced methodology uses other techniques, such as Force field analysis and 12 boundary questions.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Findings</h3>\n<p>The research findings indicate that using the proposed methodology can improve the formalization of collaboration in PAR, enabling the organization to respond better to market changes. It helps define the project scope more clearly, encouraging innovation, addressing communication barriers and considering different worldviews and practical issues. Based on the findings, the proposed enhanced methodology could complement other methodologies/frameworks such as Scrum, DT and TLS.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Research limitations/implications</h3>\n<p>The current research adds to the existing literature by identifying the challenges of recruiting PAR in managing innovation projects. A deductive reasoning process was utilized because there is no comprehensive research concerning the challenges of recruiting PAR in managing innovation projects. On the other hand, the PAR 4-phase cycle has been reviewed and enhanced to manage innovation projects.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Practical implications</h3>\n<p>The proposed methodology was used in a new product development project. The case study was done on one of the payment service provider companies that design, develop and deploy a digital product for marketing, installation, repair and maintenance of electronic funds transfer at point of sale devices.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Originality/value</h3>\n<p>No research has yet sought to identify the challenges of using PAR in innovation project management (IPM). Identifying the challenges associated with applying PAR in the IPM and providing an enhanced methodology to mitigate the challenges could fill a gap in IPM studies.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->","PeriodicalId":47374,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Managing Projects in Business","volume":"45 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Toward an enhanced methodology to mitigate challenges of applying participatory action research in managing innovation projects\",\"authors\":\"Mohammad Mehrabioun Mohammadi\",\"doi\":\"10.1108/ijmpb-01-2023-0024\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<h3>Purpose</h3>\\n<p>This research aims to examine the challenges of recruiting participatory action research (PAR) in managing innovation projects. An enhanced methodology based on PAR was developed to mitigate the challenges related to recruiting PAR in managing innovation projects. The proposed methodology was evaluated by comparing it to established methodologies/frameworks such as Scrum, Design Thinking (DT) and The Lean Startup (TLS). The evaluation aimed to determine the advantages and limitations of the proposed methodology in managing innovation projects.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\\n<h3>Design/methodology/approach</h3>\\n<p>The proposed enhanced methodology consists of eight steps, ranging from developing an understanding of the industry and business structure to learning and knowledge management. In addition, the enhanced methodology uses other techniques, such as Force field analysis and 12 boundary questions.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\\n<h3>Findings</h3>\\n<p>The research findings indicate that using the proposed methodology can improve the formalization of collaboration in PAR, enabling the organization to respond better to market changes. It helps define the project scope more clearly, encouraging innovation, addressing communication barriers and considering different worldviews and practical issues. Based on the findings, the proposed enhanced methodology could complement other methodologies/frameworks such as Scrum, DT and TLS.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\\n<h3>Research limitations/implications</h3>\\n<p>The current research adds to the existing literature by identifying the challenges of recruiting PAR in managing innovation projects. A deductive reasoning process was utilized because there is no comprehensive research concerning the challenges of recruiting PAR in managing innovation projects. On the other hand, the PAR 4-phase cycle has been reviewed and enhanced to manage innovation projects.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\\n<h3>Practical implications</h3>\\n<p>The proposed methodology was used in a new product development project. The case study was done on one of the payment service provider companies that design, develop and deploy a digital product for marketing, installation, repair and maintenance of electronic funds transfer at point of sale devices.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\\n<h3>Originality/value</h3>\\n<p>No research has yet sought to identify the challenges of using PAR in innovation project management (IPM). Identifying the challenges associated with applying PAR in the IPM and providing an enhanced methodology to mitigate the challenges could fill a gap in IPM studies.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\",\"PeriodicalId\":47374,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Managing Projects in Business\",\"volume\":\"45 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Managing Projects in Business\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"91\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1108/ijmpb-01-2023-0024\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"管理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"BUSINESS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Managing Projects in Business","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/ijmpb-01-2023-0024","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的 本研究旨在探讨在管理创新项目时招募参与式行动研究(PAR)人员所面临的挑战。研究人员开发了一种基于参与式行动研究的增强型方法,以减轻在管理创新项目时招募参与式行动研究人员所面临的挑战。通过与 Scrum、设计思维(DT)和精益创业(TLS)等既定方法/框架进行比较,对所提出的方法进行了评估。评估的目的是确定拟议方法在管理创新项目方面的优势和局限性。设计/方法/途径拟议的增强型方法包括八个步骤,从了解行业和业务结构到学习和知识管理。研究结果研究结果表明,使用建议的方法可以提高 PAR 中合作的正规化程度,使组织能够更好地应对市场变化。它有助于更清晰地界定项目范围,鼓励创新,解决沟通障碍,考虑不同的世界观和实际问题。根据研究结果,所提出的增强型方法可作为 Scrum、DT 和 TLS 等其他方法/框架的补充。本研究采用了演绎推理过程,因为目前还没有关于在创新项目管理中招募 PAR 所面临挑战的全面研究。另一方面,对 PAR 四阶段周期进行了回顾,并对创新项目管理进行了改进。案例研究的对象是一家支付服务供应商公司,该公司设计、开发和部署了一种数字产品,用于销售点设备电子资金转账的营销、安装、维修和维护。原创性/价值目前还没有研究试图确定在创新项目管理(IPM)中使用 PAR 所面临的挑战。确定与在创新项目管理中应用 PAR 相关的挑战,并提供一种增强的方法来减轻这些挑战,可以填补创新项目管理研究的空白。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Toward an enhanced methodology to mitigate challenges of applying participatory action research in managing innovation projects

Purpose

This research aims to examine the challenges of recruiting participatory action research (PAR) in managing innovation projects. An enhanced methodology based on PAR was developed to mitigate the challenges related to recruiting PAR in managing innovation projects. The proposed methodology was evaluated by comparing it to established methodologies/frameworks such as Scrum, Design Thinking (DT) and The Lean Startup (TLS). The evaluation aimed to determine the advantages and limitations of the proposed methodology in managing innovation projects.

Design/methodology/approach

The proposed enhanced methodology consists of eight steps, ranging from developing an understanding of the industry and business structure to learning and knowledge management. In addition, the enhanced methodology uses other techniques, such as Force field analysis and 12 boundary questions.

Findings

The research findings indicate that using the proposed methodology can improve the formalization of collaboration in PAR, enabling the organization to respond better to market changes. It helps define the project scope more clearly, encouraging innovation, addressing communication barriers and considering different worldviews and practical issues. Based on the findings, the proposed enhanced methodology could complement other methodologies/frameworks such as Scrum, DT and TLS.

Research limitations/implications

The current research adds to the existing literature by identifying the challenges of recruiting PAR in managing innovation projects. A deductive reasoning process was utilized because there is no comprehensive research concerning the challenges of recruiting PAR in managing innovation projects. On the other hand, the PAR 4-phase cycle has been reviewed and enhanced to manage innovation projects.

Practical implications

The proposed methodology was used in a new product development project. The case study was done on one of the payment service provider companies that design, develop and deploy a digital product for marketing, installation, repair and maintenance of electronic funds transfer at point of sale devices.

Originality/value

No research has yet sought to identify the challenges of using PAR in innovation project management (IPM). Identifying the challenges associated with applying PAR in the IPM and providing an enhanced methodology to mitigate the challenges could fill a gap in IPM studies.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.00
自引率
14.80%
发文量
45
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Managing Projects in Business seeks to advance the theory, research and practice of all aspects of project management. IJMPB is looking for top quality theoretical and empirical research with the aims of: promoting the understanding of project management and; encouraging the publication of novel project management insights using multidisciplinary approaches rooted in social sciences. The journal provides a much-needed resource involved in project management by exploring new avenues not often addressed in the field of project management.
期刊最新文献
Environmental collaboration in construction projects: roles of CSR motivations, environmental commitment and team autonomy Utilizing blockchain to enhance project management information systems: insights into project portfolio success, knowledge management and learning capabilities Facing barriers to unlock large-scale agile benefits: exploring the mediating role of organizational readiness Project governance: the impact of environmental changes on governance adaptations in large-scale projects An evaluation of the adaptive performance of architects in project teams in Ghana using fuzzy approach
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1