细菌有氧呼吸是急性下呼吸道感染患者痰液中的主要耗氧量。

IF 2.2 4区 医学 Q4 IMMUNOLOGY Apmis Pub Date : 2024-01-29 DOI:10.1111/apm.13381
Peter Østrup Jensen, Pernille Olsen, Arnold Matovu Dungu, Gertrud Baunbaek Egelund, Andreas Vestergaard Jensen, Pernille Ravn, Birgitte Lindegaard, Frederik Boëtius Hertz, Thomas Bjarnsholt, Daniel Faurholt-Jepsen, Mette Kolpen
{"title":"细菌有氧呼吸是急性下呼吸道感染患者痰液中的主要耗氧量。","authors":"Peter Østrup Jensen, Pernille Olsen, Arnold Matovu Dungu, Gertrud Baunbaek Egelund, Andreas Vestergaard Jensen, Pernille Ravn, Birgitte Lindegaard, Frederik Boëtius Hertz, Thomas Bjarnsholt, Daniel Faurholt-Jepsen, Mette Kolpen","doi":"10.1111/apm.13381","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Bacterial aerobic respiration may determine the outcome of antibiotic treatment in experimental settings, but the clinical relevance of bacterial aerobic respiration for the outcome of antibiotic treatment has not been tested. Therefore, we hypothesized that bacterial aerobic respiration is higher in sputum from patients with acute lower respiratory tract infections (aLRTI), than in sputum from patients with chronic LRTI (cLRTI), where the bacteria persist despite antibiotic treatment. The bacterial aerobic respiration was determined according to the dynamics of the oxygen (O<sub>2</sub> ) concentration in sputum from aLRTI patients (n = 52). This result was evaluated by comparison to previously published data from patients with cLRTI. O<sub>2</sub> consumption resulting in anoxic zones was more frequent in sputum with detected bacterial pathogens. The bacterial aerobic respiration in aLRTI sputum approximated 55% of the total O<sub>2</sub> consumption, which was significantly higher than previously published for cLRTI. The bacterial aerobic respiration in sputum was higher in aLRTI patients than previously seen in cLRTI patients, indicating the presence of bacteria with a sensitive physiology in aLRTI. These variations in bacterial physiology between aLRTI patients and cLRTI patients may contribute the huge difference in treatment success between the two patient groups.</p>","PeriodicalId":8167,"journal":{"name":"Apmis","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Bacterial aerobic respiration is a major consumer of oxygen in sputum from patients with acute lower respiratory tract infection.\",\"authors\":\"Peter Østrup Jensen, Pernille Olsen, Arnold Matovu Dungu, Gertrud Baunbaek Egelund, Andreas Vestergaard Jensen, Pernille Ravn, Birgitte Lindegaard, Frederik Boëtius Hertz, Thomas Bjarnsholt, Daniel Faurholt-Jepsen, Mette Kolpen\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/apm.13381\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Bacterial aerobic respiration may determine the outcome of antibiotic treatment in experimental settings, but the clinical relevance of bacterial aerobic respiration for the outcome of antibiotic treatment has not been tested. Therefore, we hypothesized that bacterial aerobic respiration is higher in sputum from patients with acute lower respiratory tract infections (aLRTI), than in sputum from patients with chronic LRTI (cLRTI), where the bacteria persist despite antibiotic treatment. The bacterial aerobic respiration was determined according to the dynamics of the oxygen (O<sub>2</sub> ) concentration in sputum from aLRTI patients (n = 52). This result was evaluated by comparison to previously published data from patients with cLRTI. O<sub>2</sub> consumption resulting in anoxic zones was more frequent in sputum with detected bacterial pathogens. The bacterial aerobic respiration in aLRTI sputum approximated 55% of the total O<sub>2</sub> consumption, which was significantly higher than previously published for cLRTI. The bacterial aerobic respiration in sputum was higher in aLRTI patients than previously seen in cLRTI patients, indicating the presence of bacteria with a sensitive physiology in aLRTI. These variations in bacterial physiology between aLRTI patients and cLRTI patients may contribute the huge difference in treatment success between the two patient groups.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8167,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Apmis\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Apmis\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/apm.13381\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"IMMUNOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Apmis","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/apm.13381","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"IMMUNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在实验环境中,细菌有氧呼吸可能决定抗生素治疗的结果,但细菌有氧呼吸与抗生素治疗结果的临床相关性尚未得到检验。因此,我们假设急性下呼吸道感染(aLRTI)患者的痰中细菌需氧呼吸量高于慢性下呼吸道感染(cLRTI)患者的痰中细菌需氧呼吸量。细菌的有氧呼吸是根据 aLRTI 患者(n = 52)痰液中氧气(O2)浓度的动态变化来确定的。这一结果与之前发表的 cLRTI 患者的数据进行了对比评估。在检测到细菌病原体的痰中,氧气消耗导致缺氧区的情况更为常见。aLRTI 痰液中的细菌有氧呼吸约占总氧气消耗量的 55%,明显高于之前发表的 cLRTI 患者的数据。aLRTI 患者痰液中的细菌有氧呼吸量高于之前在 cLRTI 患者中发现的细菌有氧呼吸量,这表明在 aLRTI 患者中存在生理机能敏感的细菌。aLRTI 患者和 cLRTI 患者在细菌生理方面的这些差异可能是导致两组患者治疗成功率存在巨大差异的原因。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Bacterial aerobic respiration is a major consumer of oxygen in sputum from patients with acute lower respiratory tract infection.

Bacterial aerobic respiration may determine the outcome of antibiotic treatment in experimental settings, but the clinical relevance of bacterial aerobic respiration for the outcome of antibiotic treatment has not been tested. Therefore, we hypothesized that bacterial aerobic respiration is higher in sputum from patients with acute lower respiratory tract infections (aLRTI), than in sputum from patients with chronic LRTI (cLRTI), where the bacteria persist despite antibiotic treatment. The bacterial aerobic respiration was determined according to the dynamics of the oxygen (O2 ) concentration in sputum from aLRTI patients (n = 52). This result was evaluated by comparison to previously published data from patients with cLRTI. O2 consumption resulting in anoxic zones was more frequent in sputum with detected bacterial pathogens. The bacterial aerobic respiration in aLRTI sputum approximated 55% of the total O2 consumption, which was significantly higher than previously published for cLRTI. The bacterial aerobic respiration in sputum was higher in aLRTI patients than previously seen in cLRTI patients, indicating the presence of bacteria with a sensitive physiology in aLRTI. These variations in bacterial physiology between aLRTI patients and cLRTI patients may contribute the huge difference in treatment success between the two patient groups.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Apmis
Apmis 医学-病理学
CiteScore
5.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
91
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: APMIS, formerly Acta Pathologica, Microbiologica et Immunologica Scandinavica, has been published since 1924 by the Scandinavian Societies for Medical Microbiology and Pathology as a non-profit-making scientific journal.
期刊最新文献
Historical concepts and contemporary perspectives of dental caries-a tribute to Henrik Dam (1895-1976). Phylogeogenomic analysis of the earliest reported sequences of SARS-CoV-2 from 161 countries. Dynamic distribution of systemically administered antibiotics in orthopeadically relevant target tissues and settings. Impact of histopathological and serological assessments on early diagnosis of leprosy relapse. Possible inhibition effects of resveratrol on pancreatic tumorigenesis in the azaserine-rat model.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1