评估硬膜外腔容量扩展对股骨近端钉手术患者脊髓麻醉质量的影响--随机对照研究。

IF 1.6 Q2 ANESTHESIOLOGY Anaesthesiology intensive therapy Pub Date : 2023-01-01 DOI:10.5114/ait.2023.134246
Vikram Bedi, Sanghamitra Debbarma, Sandeep Sharma, Rajeev Navaria, Anchal Jhawer, Santosh Choudhary
{"title":"评估硬膜外腔容量扩展对股骨近端钉手术患者脊髓麻醉质量的影响--随机对照研究。","authors":"Vikram Bedi, Sanghamitra Debbarma, Sandeep Sharma, Rajeev Navaria, Anchal Jhawer, Santosh Choudhary","doi":"10.5114/ait.2023.134246","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Epidural volume extension is technique aiming to mitigate spinal anaesthesia induced hypotension, by reducing the dose of local anaesthetics. The present study was executed to determine the effect of epidural volume extension subarachnoid block with 0.5% hyperbaric bupivacaine in patients undergoing proximal femoral nailing (PFN) regarding characteristics of sensory-motor block and postoperative analgesia.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>In this prospective, double-blind trial conducted from October 2021 to April 2022, 105 adult patients scheduled to undergo PFN were randomised into groups: control (C), 10 mL NS (E1), and 20 mL NS (E2), to receive 10 mg hyperbaric bupivacaine intrathecally plus additional epidural volume extension with 10 and 20 mL normal saline in groups E1 and E2, respectively. The primary outcome measured was the duration of postoperative analgesia. The secondary outcomes measured included onset of sensory- motor block and duration of sensory block. P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A significantly longer duration of postoperative analgesia was noted in patients receiving 10 and 20 mL epidural volume extension (365.09 ± 101.83 and 330.06 ± 35.22 vs. 265.77 ± 38.01 min in the control group, P < 0.01). Patients who received any epidural volume extension with either 10 or 20 mL had significantly quicker onset of sensory and motor block as well as prolonged duration of sensory block. No significant difference in duration of postoperative analgesia, and onset and duration of block was observed between patients receiving either 10 or 20 mL epidural volume extension.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Epidural volume extension significantly shortened the onset of sensory-motor block and increased the duration of sensory block and postoperative analgesia in patients undergoing PFN under subarachnoid block; however, no such difference was observed between 10 and 20 mL epidural volume extension.</p>","PeriodicalId":7750,"journal":{"name":"Anaesthesiology intensive therapy","volume":"55 5","pages":"366-371"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10796295/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluation of impact of epidural volume extension on the quality of spinal anaesthesia in patients undergoing proximal femoral nailing surgeries - randomized controlled study.\",\"authors\":\"Vikram Bedi, Sanghamitra Debbarma, Sandeep Sharma, Rajeev Navaria, Anchal Jhawer, Santosh Choudhary\",\"doi\":\"10.5114/ait.2023.134246\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Epidural volume extension is technique aiming to mitigate spinal anaesthesia induced hypotension, by reducing the dose of local anaesthetics. The present study was executed to determine the effect of epidural volume extension subarachnoid block with 0.5% hyperbaric bupivacaine in patients undergoing proximal femoral nailing (PFN) regarding characteristics of sensory-motor block and postoperative analgesia.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>In this prospective, double-blind trial conducted from October 2021 to April 2022, 105 adult patients scheduled to undergo PFN were randomised into groups: control (C), 10 mL NS (E1), and 20 mL NS (E2), to receive 10 mg hyperbaric bupivacaine intrathecally plus additional epidural volume extension with 10 and 20 mL normal saline in groups E1 and E2, respectively. The primary outcome measured was the duration of postoperative analgesia. The secondary outcomes measured included onset of sensory- motor block and duration of sensory block. P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A significantly longer duration of postoperative analgesia was noted in patients receiving 10 and 20 mL epidural volume extension (365.09 ± 101.83 and 330.06 ± 35.22 vs. 265.77 ± 38.01 min in the control group, P < 0.01). Patients who received any epidural volume extension with either 10 or 20 mL had significantly quicker onset of sensory and motor block as well as prolonged duration of sensory block. No significant difference in duration of postoperative analgesia, and onset and duration of block was observed between patients receiving either 10 or 20 mL epidural volume extension.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Epidural volume extension significantly shortened the onset of sensory-motor block and increased the duration of sensory block and postoperative analgesia in patients undergoing PFN under subarachnoid block; however, no such difference was observed between 10 and 20 mL epidural volume extension.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7750,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Anaesthesiology intensive therapy\",\"volume\":\"55 5\",\"pages\":\"366-371\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10796295/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Anaesthesiology intensive therapy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5114/ait.2023.134246\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ANESTHESIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Anaesthesiology intensive therapy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5114/ait.2023.134246","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

简介:硬膜外腔容积扩展技术旨在通过减少局麻药的剂量来减轻脊髓麻醉引起的低血压。本研究旨在确定硬膜外容积扩展蛛网膜下腔阻滞与0.5%高压布比卡因对股骨近端钉术(PFN)患者感觉-运动阻滞特征和术后镇痛的影响:在这项于2021年10月至2022年4月进行的前瞻性双盲试验中,105名计划接受股骨近端钉术的成年患者被随机分为对照组(C)、10毫升NS组(E1)和20毫升NS组(E2),接受10毫克高压布比卡因鞘内注射,并在E1组和E2组分别使用10毫升和20毫升生理盐水扩大硬膜外腔容积。测量的主要结果是术后镇痛持续时间。次要结果包括感觉-运动阻滞的开始时间和感觉阻滞的持续时间。P<0.05为差异有统计学意义:结果:接受 10 毫升和 20 毫升硬膜外扩容的患者术后镇痛持续时间明显更长(365.09 ± 101.83 分钟和 330.06 ± 35.22 分钟,对照组为 265.77 ± 38.01 分钟,P < 0.01)。接受任何硬膜外腔容积扩展(10 毫升或 20 毫升)的患者的感觉和运动阻滞起始时间明显更快,感觉阻滞持续时间也更长。接受10毫升或20毫升硬膜外腔容积扩展的患者在术后镇痛持续时间、阻滞开始时间和持续时间方面没有明显差异:结论:对于在蛛网膜下腔阻滞下接受 PFN 的患者,硬膜外腔容积扩展明显缩短了感觉-运动阻滞的开始时间,并延长了感觉阻滞和术后镇痛的持续时间;然而,在硬膜外腔容积扩展为 10 毫升和 20 毫升的患者之间没有观察到这种差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Evaluation of impact of epidural volume extension on the quality of spinal anaesthesia in patients undergoing proximal femoral nailing surgeries - randomized controlled study.

Introduction: Epidural volume extension is technique aiming to mitigate spinal anaesthesia induced hypotension, by reducing the dose of local anaesthetics. The present study was executed to determine the effect of epidural volume extension subarachnoid block with 0.5% hyperbaric bupivacaine in patients undergoing proximal femoral nailing (PFN) regarding characteristics of sensory-motor block and postoperative analgesia.

Material and methods: In this prospective, double-blind trial conducted from October 2021 to April 2022, 105 adult patients scheduled to undergo PFN were randomised into groups: control (C), 10 mL NS (E1), and 20 mL NS (E2), to receive 10 mg hyperbaric bupivacaine intrathecally plus additional epidural volume extension with 10 and 20 mL normal saline in groups E1 and E2, respectively. The primary outcome measured was the duration of postoperative analgesia. The secondary outcomes measured included onset of sensory- motor block and duration of sensory block. P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Results: A significantly longer duration of postoperative analgesia was noted in patients receiving 10 and 20 mL epidural volume extension (365.09 ± 101.83 and 330.06 ± 35.22 vs. 265.77 ± 38.01 min in the control group, P < 0.01). Patients who received any epidural volume extension with either 10 or 20 mL had significantly quicker onset of sensory and motor block as well as prolonged duration of sensory block. No significant difference in duration of postoperative analgesia, and onset and duration of block was observed between patients receiving either 10 or 20 mL epidural volume extension.

Conclusions: Epidural volume extension significantly shortened the onset of sensory-motor block and increased the duration of sensory block and postoperative analgesia in patients undergoing PFN under subarachnoid block; however, no such difference was observed between 10 and 20 mL epidural volume extension.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
5.90%
发文量
48
审稿时长
25 weeks
期刊最新文献
A randomised controlled trial to compare blind intubation success through LMA Blockbuster® and I-Gel® LMA. Can't intubate, can't oxygenate? What is the preferred surgical strategy? A retrospective analysis. Measures of preoperative anxiety: Part two. Navigating through the paradox of choice: prediction of outcome in aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage. Nutritional management in critically ill patients with COVID-19: a retrospective multicentre study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1