{"title":"复发性或转移性头颈部鳞状细胞癌患者进展期后的西妥昔单抗治疗：一项基于全国人群的研究（THNS-2021-08）。","authors":"Hung-Ming Wang, Pei-Jen Lou, Muh-Hwa Yang, Tein-Hua Chen, Ming-Yu Lien, Jin-Ching Lin, Jo-Pai Chen, Wei-Chen Lu, Hsueh-Ju Lu, Tai-Lin Huang, Chia-Jui Yen, Shang-Yin Wu, Hui-Ching Wang, Meng-Che Hsieh","doi":"10.1007/s11523-023-01028-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Little is known regarding the association of cetuximab treatment beyond progression (TBP) with survival among patients with recurrent or metastatic head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (R/M HNSCC). Although immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) are now considered as first-line treatment, not all patients are suitable for ICIs.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>We conducted a multicenter, retrospective study to evaluate the role of cetuximab TBP in patients with R/M HNSCC after failure of first-line cetuximab-containing chemotherapy.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>Patients with R/M HNSCC who had tumor progression after first-line cetuximab-containing chemotherapy were included into our study. Oncologic outcomes were estimated including time to cetuximab treatment discontinuation (TTD), progression-free survival 2 (PFS2), overall survival (OS), overall response rate (ORR), and disease control rate (DCR). Multivariate cox regression analysis with survival were conducted. Subgroup analysis with P16 and programmed death ligand 1 expression were performed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 498 patients were eligible with 259 patients in the TBP group and 239 patients in the non-TBP group. The most common first-line chemotherapy was the EXTREME regimen in both groups. As for second-line treatment, the most common regimen were TPEx in the TBP group and taxane-based chemotherapy in the non-TBP group. Median TTD was 8.7 months in TBP and 5.5 months in non-TBP (p < 0.001). In terms of survival, median OS1 was significant longer in the TBP group than in the non-TBP group [14.1 months versus 10.9 months (p = 0.016)]. Multivariate analysis demonstrated cetuximab TBP was a factor independently associated with OS.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our retrospective study suggests cetuximab TBP to be effective and to provide better survival for patients with R/M HNSCC after failure of first-line cetuximab-containing chemotherapy. Further prospective studies are warranted to validate the role of cetuximab TBP in R/M HNSCC.</p>","PeriodicalId":22195,"journal":{"name":"Targeted Oncology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10830868/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Cetuximab Treatment beyond Progression in Patients with Recurrent or Metastatic Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma: A Nationwide Population-Based Study (THNS-2021-08).\",\"authors\":\"Hung-Ming Wang, Pei-Jen Lou, Muh-Hwa Yang, Tein-Hua Chen, Ming-Yu Lien, Jin-Ching Lin, Jo-Pai Chen, Wei-Chen Lu, Hsueh-Ju Lu, Tai-Lin Huang, Chia-Jui Yen, Shang-Yin Wu, Hui-Ching Wang, Meng-Che Hsieh\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s11523-023-01028-7\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Little is known regarding the association of cetuximab treatment beyond progression (TBP) with survival among patients with recurrent or metastatic head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (R/M HNSCC). Although immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) are now considered as first-line treatment, not all patients are suitable for ICIs.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>We conducted a multicenter, retrospective study to evaluate the role of cetuximab TBP in patients with R/M HNSCC after failure of first-line cetuximab-containing chemotherapy.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>Patients with R/M HNSCC who had tumor progression after first-line cetuximab-containing chemotherapy were included into our study. Oncologic outcomes were estimated including time to cetuximab treatment discontinuation (TTD), progression-free survival 2 (PFS2), overall survival (OS), overall response rate (ORR), and disease control rate (DCR). Multivariate cox regression analysis with survival were conducted. Subgroup analysis with P16 and programmed death ligand 1 expression were performed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 498 patients were eligible with 259 patients in the TBP group and 239 patients in the non-TBP group. The most common first-line chemotherapy was the EXTREME regimen in both groups. As for second-line treatment, the most common regimen were TPEx in the TBP group and taxane-based chemotherapy in the non-TBP group. Median TTD was 8.7 months in TBP and 5.5 months in non-TBP (p < 0.001). In terms of survival, median OS1 was significant longer in the TBP group than in the non-TBP group [14.1 months versus 10.9 months (p = 0.016)]. Multivariate analysis demonstrated cetuximab TBP was a factor independently associated with OS.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our retrospective study suggests cetuximab TBP to be effective and to provide better survival for patients with R/M HNSCC after failure of first-line cetuximab-containing chemotherapy. Further prospective studies are warranted to validate the role of cetuximab TBP in R/M HNSCC.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":22195,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Targeted Oncology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10830868/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Targeted Oncology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11523-023-01028-7\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/1/29 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Targeted Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11523-023-01028-7","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/29 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Cetuximab Treatment beyond Progression in Patients with Recurrent or Metastatic Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma: A Nationwide Population-Based Study (THNS-2021-08).
Background: Little is known regarding the association of cetuximab treatment beyond progression (TBP) with survival among patients with recurrent or metastatic head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (R/M HNSCC). Although immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) are now considered as first-line treatment, not all patients are suitable for ICIs.
Objective: We conducted a multicenter, retrospective study to evaluate the role of cetuximab TBP in patients with R/M HNSCC after failure of first-line cetuximab-containing chemotherapy.
Patients and methods: Patients with R/M HNSCC who had tumor progression after first-line cetuximab-containing chemotherapy were included into our study. Oncologic outcomes were estimated including time to cetuximab treatment discontinuation (TTD), progression-free survival 2 (PFS2), overall survival (OS), overall response rate (ORR), and disease control rate (DCR). Multivariate cox regression analysis with survival were conducted. Subgroup analysis with P16 and programmed death ligand 1 expression were performed.
Results: A total of 498 patients were eligible with 259 patients in the TBP group and 239 patients in the non-TBP group. The most common first-line chemotherapy was the EXTREME regimen in both groups. As for second-line treatment, the most common regimen were TPEx in the TBP group and taxane-based chemotherapy in the non-TBP group. Median TTD was 8.7 months in TBP and 5.5 months in non-TBP (p < 0.001). In terms of survival, median OS1 was significant longer in the TBP group than in the non-TBP group [14.1 months versus 10.9 months (p = 0.016)]. Multivariate analysis demonstrated cetuximab TBP was a factor independently associated with OS.
Conclusions: Our retrospective study suggests cetuximab TBP to be effective and to provide better survival for patients with R/M HNSCC after failure of first-line cetuximab-containing chemotherapy. Further prospective studies are warranted to validate the role of cetuximab TBP in R/M HNSCC.
期刊介绍：
Targeted Oncology addresses physicians and scientists committed to oncology and cancer research by providing a programme of articles on molecularly targeted pharmacotherapy in oncology. The journal includes:
Original Research Articles on all aspects of molecularly targeted agents for the treatment of cancer, including immune checkpoint inhibitors and related approaches.
Comprehensive narrative Review Articles and shorter Leading Articles discussing relevant clinically established as well as emerging agents and pathways.
Current Opinion articles that place interesting areas in perspective.
Therapy in Practice articles that provide a guide to the optimum management of a condition and highlight practical, clinically relevant considerations and recommendations.
Systematic Reviews that use explicit, systematic methods as outlined by the PRISMA statement.
Adis Drug Reviews of the properties and place in therapy of both newer and established targeted drugs in oncology.
京公网安备 11010802042870号
京ICP备2023020795号-1
分享
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
扫码关注我们
