我们错失良机了吗?了解一家农村边境医院的健康素养。

IF 1.7 4区 医学 Q2 NURSING Clinical Nursing Research Pub Date : 2024-06-01 Epub Date: 2024-01-27 DOI:10.1177/10547738231221861
Shiloh A Williams, Mary Martin, Leslie C Hussey, Maria Ojeda, Beverly Carlson, Maria Keckler
{"title":"我们错失良机了吗?了解一家农村边境医院的健康素养。","authors":"Shiloh A Williams, Mary Martin, Leslie C Hussey, Maria Ojeda, Beverly Carlson, Maria Keckler","doi":"10.1177/10547738231221861","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Low health literacy (LHL) significantly impacts patients' ability to participate actively in their healthcare. Registered nurses (RNs) play a crucial role in identifying LHL and addressing patient knowledge gaps and skill deficits. This correlational study examined the relationship between RNs' predictions of patients' health literacy levels (HLL) and the actual HLL of a predominately Hispanic patient population. In addition, personal factors (i.e., demographics) were analyzed to determine their influence on the nurse's predictions and patients' HLL. Data were collected from 84 participant patient-nurse couplets admitted to a medical-surgical unit in a rural setting located on the United States-Mexico border. In addition to demographic information collected via survey, RNs were asked to predict their patient's health literacy abilities while the <i>Newest Vital Sign</i>, a health literacy assessment tool, was deployed to determine the actual HLL of patients participating in the study. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics, <i>t</i>-tests, and chi-square tests while a Spearman correlational model was used to examine the relationship between predicted HLL and actual HLL. Finally, a logistic regression model was used to analyze the relationship between personal factors and HL data for RNs and patients. Analysis of the data revealed that RNs consistently overestimated patients' abilities, as evidenced by the disparity between patients' actual HLL (mean 1.71) and predicted HLL (mean 4.26) by RNs, with a moderately strong positive relationship (<i>r<sub>s</sub></i> = .418). Notably, higher academic preparation and years of experience did not enhance the RNs' ability to identify LHL while the <i>highest level of education completed</i> was the only statistically significant predictor of adequate health literacy in the patient population sampled. These findings emphasize the need to prioritize effective health literacy education in RN academic preparation and clinical practice to support the detection of LHL when a standardized health literacy assessment tool is not utilized in the clinical setting. By recognizing the presence of LHL, healthcare professionals can better support patients' needs and bridge the knowledge gap, ultimately improving patient outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":50677,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Nursing Research","volume":" ","pages":"326-333"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Are We Missing the Mark? Understanding Health Literacy in A Rural-Border Hospital.\",\"authors\":\"Shiloh A Williams, Mary Martin, Leslie C Hussey, Maria Ojeda, Beverly Carlson, Maria Keckler\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/10547738231221861\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Low health literacy (LHL) significantly impacts patients' ability to participate actively in their healthcare. Registered nurses (RNs) play a crucial role in identifying LHL and addressing patient knowledge gaps and skill deficits. This correlational study examined the relationship between RNs' predictions of patients' health literacy levels (HLL) and the actual HLL of a predominately Hispanic patient population. In addition, personal factors (i.e., demographics) were analyzed to determine their influence on the nurse's predictions and patients' HLL. Data were collected from 84 participant patient-nurse couplets admitted to a medical-surgical unit in a rural setting located on the United States-Mexico border. In addition to demographic information collected via survey, RNs were asked to predict their patient's health literacy abilities while the <i>Newest Vital Sign</i>, a health literacy assessment tool, was deployed to determine the actual HLL of patients participating in the study. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics, <i>t</i>-tests, and chi-square tests while a Spearman correlational model was used to examine the relationship between predicted HLL and actual HLL. Finally, a logistic regression model was used to analyze the relationship between personal factors and HL data for RNs and patients. Analysis of the data revealed that RNs consistently overestimated patients' abilities, as evidenced by the disparity between patients' actual HLL (mean 1.71) and predicted HLL (mean 4.26) by RNs, with a moderately strong positive relationship (<i>r<sub>s</sub></i> = .418). Notably, higher academic preparation and years of experience did not enhance the RNs' ability to identify LHL while the <i>highest level of education completed</i> was the only statistically significant predictor of adequate health literacy in the patient population sampled. These findings emphasize the need to prioritize effective health literacy education in RN academic preparation and clinical practice to support the detection of LHL when a standardized health literacy assessment tool is not utilized in the clinical setting. By recognizing the presence of LHL, healthcare professionals can better support patients' needs and bridge the knowledge gap, ultimately improving patient outcomes.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50677,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical Nursing Research\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"326-333\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical Nursing Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/10547738231221861\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/1/27 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"NURSING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Nursing Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10547738231221861","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/27 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

低健康素养(LHL)严重影响了患者积极参与医疗保健的能力。注册护士(RNs)在识别 LHL 和解决患者知识差距和技能缺陷方面发挥着至关重要的作用。这项相关性研究考察了注册护士对患者健康素养水平(HLL)的预测与以西班牙裔患者为主的实际 HLL 之间的关系。此外,还分析了个人因素(即人口统计学),以确定其对护士预测和患者健康素养水平的影响。研究人员从位于美国与墨西哥边境的一个农村地区内科外科病房的 84 名参与研究的病人-护士对联中收集了数据。除了通过调查收集人口信息外,还要求护士预测病人的健康素养能力,同时使用健康素养评估工具 Newest Vital Sign 来确定参与研究的病人的实际健康素养水平。使用描述性统计、t 检验和卡方检验对数据进行分析,同时使用斯皮尔曼相关模型来检验预测 HLL 与实际 HLL 之间的关系。最后,使用逻辑回归模型分析了护士和患者的个人因素与 HL 数据之间的关系。数据分析显示,护士一直高估了患者的能力,患者的实际 HLL(平均值 1.71)与护士预测的 HLL(平均值 4.26)之间的差距就证明了这一点,两者之间存在中等强度的正相关关系(rs = .418)。值得注意的是,较高的学历和工作年限并没有提高护士识别 LHL 的能力,而最高学历是抽样调查的患者群体中唯一具有统计学意义的充分健康素养预测指标。这些发现强调,当临床环境中没有使用标准化的健康素养评估工具时,有必要在护士的学术准备和临床实践中优先考虑有效的健康素养教育,以支持对 LHL 的检测。通过识别 LHL 的存在,医护人员可以更好地满足患者的需求,缩小知识差距,最终改善患者的治疗效果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Are We Missing the Mark? Understanding Health Literacy in A Rural-Border Hospital.

Low health literacy (LHL) significantly impacts patients' ability to participate actively in their healthcare. Registered nurses (RNs) play a crucial role in identifying LHL and addressing patient knowledge gaps and skill deficits. This correlational study examined the relationship between RNs' predictions of patients' health literacy levels (HLL) and the actual HLL of a predominately Hispanic patient population. In addition, personal factors (i.e., demographics) were analyzed to determine their influence on the nurse's predictions and patients' HLL. Data were collected from 84 participant patient-nurse couplets admitted to a medical-surgical unit in a rural setting located on the United States-Mexico border. In addition to demographic information collected via survey, RNs were asked to predict their patient's health literacy abilities while the Newest Vital Sign, a health literacy assessment tool, was deployed to determine the actual HLL of patients participating in the study. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics, t-tests, and chi-square tests while a Spearman correlational model was used to examine the relationship between predicted HLL and actual HLL. Finally, a logistic regression model was used to analyze the relationship between personal factors and HL data for RNs and patients. Analysis of the data revealed that RNs consistently overestimated patients' abilities, as evidenced by the disparity between patients' actual HLL (mean 1.71) and predicted HLL (mean 4.26) by RNs, with a moderately strong positive relationship (rs = .418). Notably, higher academic preparation and years of experience did not enhance the RNs' ability to identify LHL while the highest level of education completed was the only statistically significant predictor of adequate health literacy in the patient population sampled. These findings emphasize the need to prioritize effective health literacy education in RN academic preparation and clinical practice to support the detection of LHL when a standardized health literacy assessment tool is not utilized in the clinical setting. By recognizing the presence of LHL, healthcare professionals can better support patients' needs and bridge the knowledge gap, ultimately improving patient outcomes.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
5.90%
发文量
107
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Clinical Nursing Research (CNR) is a peer-reviewed quarterly journal that addresses issues of clinical research that are meaningful to practicing nurses, providing an international forum to encourage discussion among clinical practitioners, enhance clinical practice by pinpointing potential clinical applications of the latest scholarly research, and disseminate research findings of particular interest to practicing nurses. This journal is a member of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE).
期刊最新文献
Effect of Self-Proning on Respiratory Functions, Pneumonia Severity, and Mortality Risk Among Patients Diagnosed With Community-Acquired Pneumonia: A Nursing-Based Quasi-Experimental Study. Implementing Resourcefulness Training© with Parent Caregivers of Children Dependent on Medical Technology During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Lessons Learned from a Randomized Controlled Trial. Frailty and Its Associated Factors in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation: A Cross-Sectional Study. Knowledge, Attitudes, and Cultural Beliefs of Afghan Refugee Women Toward Gynecological Cancer: A Qualitative Study. Effect of Meaning-in-Life Interventions for Advanced Cancer Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1