定义临床实验室允许的总误差限值。

Advances in clinical chemistry Pub Date : 2024-01-01 Epub Date: 2023-12-20 DOI:10.1016/bs.acc.2023.11.006
Jill Palmer, Kornelia Galior
{"title":"定义临床实验室允许的总误差限值。","authors":"Jill Palmer, Kornelia Galior","doi":"10.1016/bs.acc.2023.11.006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Allowable total error (ATE) are performance specification limits predefined for a variety of laboratory analytes. These limits define the maximum amount of error that is allowed for an assay when judging acceptability of a new assay during method verification/validation, evaluating patient or instrument comparison data, or in designing a quality control strategy. There are several widely available resources and models that can serve as a guide in selecting ATE. They may be based on legal requirements or set by providers of proficiency testing (PT) and external quality assessment schemes (EQAS). ATE can be also determined by professional expert groups or be based on biological variation of an analyte. Because there are several resources to choose from, there have been several attempts in reaching consensus on which ATE resource should be given preference. This chapter reviews several of these resources in more detail and discusses the difference between allowable total error (ATE) and observed total analytical error (TAE).</p>","PeriodicalId":101297,"journal":{"name":"Advances in clinical chemistry","volume":"118 ","pages":"205-223"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Defining allowable total error limits in the clinical laboratory.\",\"authors\":\"Jill Palmer, Kornelia Galior\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/bs.acc.2023.11.006\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Allowable total error (ATE) are performance specification limits predefined for a variety of laboratory analytes. These limits define the maximum amount of error that is allowed for an assay when judging acceptability of a new assay during method verification/validation, evaluating patient or instrument comparison data, or in designing a quality control strategy. There are several widely available resources and models that can serve as a guide in selecting ATE. They may be based on legal requirements or set by providers of proficiency testing (PT) and external quality assessment schemes (EQAS). ATE can be also determined by professional expert groups or be based on biological variation of an analyte. Because there are several resources to choose from, there have been several attempts in reaching consensus on which ATE resource should be given preference. This chapter reviews several of these resources in more detail and discusses the difference between allowable total error (ATE) and observed total analytical error (TAE).</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":101297,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Advances in clinical chemistry\",\"volume\":\"118 \",\"pages\":\"205-223\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Advances in clinical chemistry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/bs.acc.2023.11.006\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/12/20 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advances in clinical chemistry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/bs.acc.2023.11.006","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/12/20 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

允许总误差 (ATE) 是为各种实验室分析物预先设定的性能规范限值。在方法验证/确认、评估患者或仪器对比数据或设计质量控制策略时,这些限值规定了在判断新检测方法的可接受性时所允许的最大误差。有几种广泛可用的资源和模型可作为选择 ATE 的指南。它们可能基于法律要求,或由能力验证(PT)和外部质量评估计划(EQAS)的提供者设定。ATE 也可由专业专家组确定,或基于分析物的生物变异。由于有多种资源可供选择,人们曾多次尝试就应优先选择哪种 ATE 资源达成共识。本章将更详细地回顾其中的几种资源,并讨论允许总误差 (ATE) 与观察到的总分析误差 (TAE) 之间的区别。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Defining allowable total error limits in the clinical laboratory.

Allowable total error (ATE) are performance specification limits predefined for a variety of laboratory analytes. These limits define the maximum amount of error that is allowed for an assay when judging acceptability of a new assay during method verification/validation, evaluating patient or instrument comparison data, or in designing a quality control strategy. There are several widely available resources and models that can serve as a guide in selecting ATE. They may be based on legal requirements or set by providers of proficiency testing (PT) and external quality assessment schemes (EQAS). ATE can be also determined by professional expert groups or be based on biological variation of an analyte. Because there are several resources to choose from, there have been several attempts in reaching consensus on which ATE resource should be given preference. This chapter reviews several of these resources in more detail and discusses the difference between allowable total error (ATE) and observed total analytical error (TAE).

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Natriuretic peptide testing strategies in heart failure: A 2023 update. Advances in endotoxin analysis. Defining allowable total error limits in the clinical laboratory. Gastrointestinal hormones: History, biology, and measurement. Molecular biology of SARS-CoV-2 and techniques of diagnosis and surveillance.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1