Lindsey M. Hartfiel , Carolina Díaz-García , Laura E. Christianson , Michelle L. Soupir
{"title":"基于情景的抽水脱硝生物反应器技术经济分析","authors":"Lindsey M. Hartfiel , Carolina Díaz-García , Laura E. Christianson , Michelle L. Soupir","doi":"10.1016/j.wre.2024.100238","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Pumped denitrification bioreactors are currently being assessed in the field to extend the use of traditional, subsurface drainage bioreactors. Pumped bioreactors for the treatment of drainage ditches, surface waters, and cisterns intercepting drainage were evaluated to provide a basis of the unit cost of bioreactor operation ($ kg NO<sub>3</sub>–N removed<sup>−1</sup>) under a variety of scenarios. The unit costs were modeled using a techno-economic analysis. The variables assessed in the analysis included nitrate removal rate, bioreactor lifespan, and operating periods, which were assumed. To evaluate the impact of these variables on the unit cost, a sensitivity analysis was conducted where one variable was adjusted (e.g., lifespan) while the other variables were kept the same as a traditional bioreactor. The cistern and supplemental surface water bioreactors were larger in size and had similar unit costs ranging from ∼$5 to $27 kg NO<sub>3</sub>–N removed<sup>−1</sup> for all scenarios except for the low mass removal and worst-case scenarios. The smaller, ditch diversion bioreactor had unit costs in the best- and worst-case scenarios in the range of $24 to $619 kg NO<sub>3</sub>–N removed<sup>−1</sup>, respectively. A breakeven analysis indicated increasing the mass removal rate of the bioreactors and ensuring an operating period greater than 6-months had the greatest impact on reducing the unit cost compared to a traditional bioreactor. Overall, the larger-scale surface water and cistern bioreactors had comparable, but slightly higher, unit costs than traditional bioreactors under most scenarios evaluated. This information can be used to optimize and inform of the potential of pumped bioreactor systems.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48644,"journal":{"name":"Water Resources and Economics","volume":"46 ","pages":"Article 100238"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2212428424000021/pdfft?md5=56a8c2583548dcf3c650bd969c991a27&pid=1-s2.0-S2212428424000021-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Scenario-based techno-economic analysis of pumped denitrification bioreactors\",\"authors\":\"Lindsey M. Hartfiel , Carolina Díaz-García , Laura E. Christianson , Michelle L. Soupir\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.wre.2024.100238\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Pumped denitrification bioreactors are currently being assessed in the field to extend the use of traditional, subsurface drainage bioreactors. Pumped bioreactors for the treatment of drainage ditches, surface waters, and cisterns intercepting drainage were evaluated to provide a basis of the unit cost of bioreactor operation ($ kg NO<sub>3</sub>–N removed<sup>−1</sup>) under a variety of scenarios. The unit costs were modeled using a techno-economic analysis. The variables assessed in the analysis included nitrate removal rate, bioreactor lifespan, and operating periods, which were assumed. To evaluate the impact of these variables on the unit cost, a sensitivity analysis was conducted where one variable was adjusted (e.g., lifespan) while the other variables were kept the same as a traditional bioreactor. The cistern and supplemental surface water bioreactors were larger in size and had similar unit costs ranging from ∼$5 to $27 kg NO<sub>3</sub>–N removed<sup>−1</sup> for all scenarios except for the low mass removal and worst-case scenarios. The smaller, ditch diversion bioreactor had unit costs in the best- and worst-case scenarios in the range of $24 to $619 kg NO<sub>3</sub>–N removed<sup>−1</sup>, respectively. A breakeven analysis indicated increasing the mass removal rate of the bioreactors and ensuring an operating period greater than 6-months had the greatest impact on reducing the unit cost compared to a traditional bioreactor. Overall, the larger-scale surface water and cistern bioreactors had comparable, but slightly higher, unit costs than traditional bioreactors under most scenarios evaluated. This information can be used to optimize and inform of the potential of pumped bioreactor systems.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48644,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Water Resources and Economics\",\"volume\":\"46 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100238\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2212428424000021/pdfft?md5=56a8c2583548dcf3c650bd969c991a27&pid=1-s2.0-S2212428424000021-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Water Resources and Economics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2212428424000021\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ECONOMICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Water Resources and Economics","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2212428424000021","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
Scenario-based techno-economic analysis of pumped denitrification bioreactors
Pumped denitrification bioreactors are currently being assessed in the field to extend the use of traditional, subsurface drainage bioreactors. Pumped bioreactors for the treatment of drainage ditches, surface waters, and cisterns intercepting drainage were evaluated to provide a basis of the unit cost of bioreactor operation ($ kg NO3–N removed−1) under a variety of scenarios. The unit costs were modeled using a techno-economic analysis. The variables assessed in the analysis included nitrate removal rate, bioreactor lifespan, and operating periods, which were assumed. To evaluate the impact of these variables on the unit cost, a sensitivity analysis was conducted where one variable was adjusted (e.g., lifespan) while the other variables were kept the same as a traditional bioreactor. The cistern and supplemental surface water bioreactors were larger in size and had similar unit costs ranging from ∼$5 to $27 kg NO3–N removed−1 for all scenarios except for the low mass removal and worst-case scenarios. The smaller, ditch diversion bioreactor had unit costs in the best- and worst-case scenarios in the range of $24 to $619 kg NO3–N removed−1, respectively. A breakeven analysis indicated increasing the mass removal rate of the bioreactors and ensuring an operating period greater than 6-months had the greatest impact on reducing the unit cost compared to a traditional bioreactor. Overall, the larger-scale surface water and cistern bioreactors had comparable, but slightly higher, unit costs than traditional bioreactors under most scenarios evaluated. This information can be used to optimize and inform of the potential of pumped bioreactor systems.
期刊介绍:
Water Resources and Economics is one of a series of specialist titles launched by the highly-regarded Water Research. For the purpose of sustainable water resources management, understanding the multiple connections and feedback mechanisms between water resources and the economy is crucial. Water Resources and Economics addresses the financial and economic dimensions associated with water resources use and governance, across different economic sectors like agriculture, energy, industry, shipping, recreation and urban and rural water supply, at local, regional and transboundary scale.
Topics of interest include (but are not restricted to) the economics of:
Aquatic ecosystem services-
Blue economy-
Climate change and flood risk management-
Climate smart agriculture-
Coastal management-
Droughts and water scarcity-
Environmental flows-
Eutrophication-
Food, water, energy nexus-
Groundwater management-
Hydropower generation-
Hydrological risks and uncertainties-
Marine resources-
Nature-based solutions-
Resource recovery-
River restoration-
Storm water harvesting-
Transboundary water allocation-
Urban water management-
Wastewater treatment-
Watershed management-
Water health risks-
Water pollution-
Water quality management-
Water security-
Water stress-
Water technology innovation.