印度医生对远程医疗的看法和使用情况:横断面研究

IF 3.4 3区 医学 Q1 HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES Health Policy and Technology Pub Date : 2024-06-01 DOI:10.1016/j.hlpt.2024.100845
Vikranth H. Nagaraja , Biswanath Ghosh Dastidar , Shailesh Suri , Anant R. Jani
{"title":"印度医生对远程医疗的看法和使用情况:横断面研究","authors":"Vikranth H. Nagaraja ,&nbsp;Biswanath Ghosh Dastidar ,&nbsp;Shailesh Suri ,&nbsp;Anant R. Jani","doi":"10.1016/j.hlpt.2024.100845","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>India has committed to formulating a roadmap for realising a resilient health system, with digital health being an important element. Following the successful implementation of a free telemedicine service, eSanjeevani, India published the Telemedicine Practice Guidelines in 2020 to scale telemedicine use in India. The current study aims to understand the perspective and use of telemedicine by medical doctors in India after the release of these guidelines.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Data were acquired through an anonymous, cross-sectional, internet-based survey of medical doctors (<em>n</em> = 444) at a pan-India level. Replies were subjected to statistical analysis.</p></div><div><h3>Findings</h3><p>Telemedicine was used for various non-mutually exclusive reasons, with the top two reasons being live audio or video consultations (60.4 %) and online payments (19.1 %), and smartphones were the most frequently used device type (60.6 %). Among various benefits of telemedicine, almost all respondents (93 %) recognised the potential for telemedicine to reduce COVID-19 infection risk for healthcare professionals. Interestingly, nearly 45 % of respondents felt that limited and fragmented insurance coverage was an important limitation to the practice of telemedicine in India, and 49 % believed reduced patient fees for teleconsultations could help incentivise telemedicine use.</p></div><div><h3>Interpretation</h3><p>This study helps to appraise the use of telemedicine in India after the publication of telemedicine guidelines in 2020. Furthermore, the findings can inform the development of telemedicine platforms, policies and incentives to improve the design and implementation of effective telemedicine in India.</p></div><div><h3>Funding</h3><p>No funding to report.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48672,"journal":{"name":"Health Policy and Technology","volume":"13 2","pages":"Article 100845"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S221188372400008X/pdfft?md5=513d1d508939da2c007f66de61c13d7d&pid=1-s2.0-S221188372400008X-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Perspectives and use of telemedicine by doctors in India: A cross-sectional study\",\"authors\":\"Vikranth H. Nagaraja ,&nbsp;Biswanath Ghosh Dastidar ,&nbsp;Shailesh Suri ,&nbsp;Anant R. Jani\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.hlpt.2024.100845\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>India has committed to formulating a roadmap for realising a resilient health system, with digital health being an important element. Following the successful implementation of a free telemedicine service, eSanjeevani, India published the Telemedicine Practice Guidelines in 2020 to scale telemedicine use in India. The current study aims to understand the perspective and use of telemedicine by medical doctors in India after the release of these guidelines.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Data were acquired through an anonymous, cross-sectional, internet-based survey of medical doctors (<em>n</em> = 444) at a pan-India level. Replies were subjected to statistical analysis.</p></div><div><h3>Findings</h3><p>Telemedicine was used for various non-mutually exclusive reasons, with the top two reasons being live audio or video consultations (60.4 %) and online payments (19.1 %), and smartphones were the most frequently used device type (60.6 %). Among various benefits of telemedicine, almost all respondents (93 %) recognised the potential for telemedicine to reduce COVID-19 infection risk for healthcare professionals. Interestingly, nearly 45 % of respondents felt that limited and fragmented insurance coverage was an important limitation to the practice of telemedicine in India, and 49 % believed reduced patient fees for teleconsultations could help incentivise telemedicine use.</p></div><div><h3>Interpretation</h3><p>This study helps to appraise the use of telemedicine in India after the publication of telemedicine guidelines in 2020. Furthermore, the findings can inform the development of telemedicine platforms, policies and incentives to improve the design and implementation of effective telemedicine in India.</p></div><div><h3>Funding</h3><p>No funding to report.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48672,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Health Policy and Technology\",\"volume\":\"13 2\",\"pages\":\"Article 100845\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S221188372400008X/pdfft?md5=513d1d508939da2c007f66de61c13d7d&pid=1-s2.0-S221188372400008X-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Health Policy and Technology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S221188372400008X\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health Policy and Technology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S221188372400008X","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景印度致力于制定实现弹性医疗系统的路线图,其中数字医疗是一个重要因素。在成功实施免费远程医疗服务 eSanjeevani 之后,印度于 2020 年发布了《远程医疗实践指南》,以扩大远程医疗在印度的使用。本研究旨在了解印度医生在这些指南发布后对远程医疗的看法和使用情况。研究方法通过对全印度医生(n = 444)进行匿名、横断面、基于互联网的调查获得数据。结果远程医疗被用于各种非相互排斥的原因,其中前两个原因是现场音频或视频咨询(60.4%)和在线支付(19.1%),智能手机是最常使用的设备类型(60.6%)。在远程医疗的各种好处中,几乎所有受访者(93%)都认为远程医疗有可能降低医护人员感染 COVID-19 的风险。有趣的是,近 45% 的受访者认为,有限且分散的保险覆盖范围是印度远程医疗实践的一个重要限制因素,49% 的受访者认为,降低远程会诊的患者费用有助于激励远程医疗的使用。此外,研究结果还可为远程医疗平台、政策和激励措施的开发提供参考,从而改进印度有效远程医疗的设计和实施。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Perspectives and use of telemedicine by doctors in India: A cross-sectional study

Background

India has committed to formulating a roadmap for realising a resilient health system, with digital health being an important element. Following the successful implementation of a free telemedicine service, eSanjeevani, India published the Telemedicine Practice Guidelines in 2020 to scale telemedicine use in India. The current study aims to understand the perspective and use of telemedicine by medical doctors in India after the release of these guidelines.

Methods

Data were acquired through an anonymous, cross-sectional, internet-based survey of medical doctors (n = 444) at a pan-India level. Replies were subjected to statistical analysis.

Findings

Telemedicine was used for various non-mutually exclusive reasons, with the top two reasons being live audio or video consultations (60.4 %) and online payments (19.1 %), and smartphones were the most frequently used device type (60.6 %). Among various benefits of telemedicine, almost all respondents (93 %) recognised the potential for telemedicine to reduce COVID-19 infection risk for healthcare professionals. Interestingly, nearly 45 % of respondents felt that limited and fragmented insurance coverage was an important limitation to the practice of telemedicine in India, and 49 % believed reduced patient fees for teleconsultations could help incentivise telemedicine use.

Interpretation

This study helps to appraise the use of telemedicine in India after the publication of telemedicine guidelines in 2020. Furthermore, the findings can inform the development of telemedicine platforms, policies and incentives to improve the design and implementation of effective telemedicine in India.

Funding

No funding to report.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Health Policy and Technology
Health Policy and Technology Medicine-Health Policy
CiteScore
9.20
自引率
3.30%
发文量
78
审稿时长
88 days
期刊介绍: Health Policy and Technology (HPT), is the official journal of the Fellowship of Postgraduate Medicine (FPM), a cross-disciplinary journal, which focuses on past, present and future health policy and the role of technology in clinical and non-clinical national and international health environments. HPT provides a further excellent way for the FPM to continue to make important national and international contributions to development of policy and practice within medicine and related disciplines. The aim of HPT is to publish relevant, timely and accessible articles and commentaries to support policy-makers, health professionals, health technology providers, patient groups and academia interested in health policy and technology. Topics covered by HPT will include: - Health technology, including drug discovery, diagnostics, medicines, devices, therapeutic delivery and eHealth systems - Cross-national comparisons on health policy using evidence-based approaches - National studies on health policy to determine the outcomes of technology-driven initiatives - Cross-border eHealth including health tourism - The digital divide in mobility, access and affordability of healthcare - Health technology assessment (HTA) methods and tools for evaluating the effectiveness of clinical and non-clinical health technologies - Health and eHealth indicators and benchmarks (measure/metrics) for understanding the adoption and diffusion of health technologies - Health and eHealth models and frameworks to support policy-makers and other stakeholders in decision-making - Stakeholder engagement with health technologies (clinical and patient/citizen buy-in) - Regulation and health economics
期刊最新文献
Challenges of shared decision-making in virtual care: Whom should we care for, and how? Individual factors that affect laypeople's understanding of definitions of medical jargon An insight into the implementation, utilization, and evaluation of telemedicine e-consultation services in Egypt Multiple criteria qualitative value-based pricing framework “MARIE” for new drugs Assessing contributing and mediating factors of telemedicine on healthcare provider burnout
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1