基于活动的疼痛检查 (ABC) 的开发与验证:功能性疼痛量表

Celina G Virgen, Robert Wright, Bryan Renslo, Tuleen Sawaf, Hanna Moradi, Maria Edelen, Jennifer Villwock
{"title":"基于活动的疼痛检查 (ABC) 的开发与验证:功能性疼痛量表","authors":"Celina G Virgen, Robert Wright, Bryan Renslo, Tuleen Sawaf, Hanna Moradi, Maria Edelen, Jennifer Villwock","doi":"10.1101/2024.01.29.24301629","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The Activity Based-Checks of Pain (ABCs) is a pain assessment tool incorporating activities of daily living and instrumental activities of daily living. Unlike widely used pain scales which are oftentimes unidimensional and highly subjective, the ABCs was designed to focus on function capabilities and limitations of patients due to pain. This study sought out to validate the factorial structure of the ABCs and assess its use in participants with chronic pain. Participants were recruited in two phases from Prolific; an online service designed to identify research participant recruitment based on study criteria. Phase one optimized the design of the ABCs, with 297 subjects selecting their preferred icon for each function and rating its understandability. The most preferred and understandable icons were then used in phase two, where 304 chronic pain participants completed the ABCs, PROMIS-29, additional PROMIS items that were analogous to the ABCs functions but not represented in the PROMIS-29, and the Brief Pain Inventory (BPI). Data was analyzed using exploratory factor analysis and confirmatory factor analysis demonstrating four factor loadings: multi-planal activities, sitting/hip flexor pain, walking/ambulation, and pain interference with lightweight unilateral activities. High internal consistency was demonstrated with all four factor loadings. Correlations between items in the ABCs, PROMIS, and BPI resulted in moderate to strong correlations demonstrating strong evidence for the validity of the ABCs as a functional pain assessment tool.","PeriodicalId":501393,"journal":{"name":"medRxiv - Pain Medicine","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Development and Validation of The Activity-Based Checks (ABCs) of Pain: A Functional Pain Scale\",\"authors\":\"Celina G Virgen, Robert Wright, Bryan Renslo, Tuleen Sawaf, Hanna Moradi, Maria Edelen, Jennifer Villwock\",\"doi\":\"10.1101/2024.01.29.24301629\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The Activity Based-Checks of Pain (ABCs) is a pain assessment tool incorporating activities of daily living and instrumental activities of daily living. Unlike widely used pain scales which are oftentimes unidimensional and highly subjective, the ABCs was designed to focus on function capabilities and limitations of patients due to pain. This study sought out to validate the factorial structure of the ABCs and assess its use in participants with chronic pain. Participants were recruited in two phases from Prolific; an online service designed to identify research participant recruitment based on study criteria. Phase one optimized the design of the ABCs, with 297 subjects selecting their preferred icon for each function and rating its understandability. The most preferred and understandable icons were then used in phase two, where 304 chronic pain participants completed the ABCs, PROMIS-29, additional PROMIS items that were analogous to the ABCs functions but not represented in the PROMIS-29, and the Brief Pain Inventory (BPI). Data was analyzed using exploratory factor analysis and confirmatory factor analysis demonstrating four factor loadings: multi-planal activities, sitting/hip flexor pain, walking/ambulation, and pain interference with lightweight unilateral activities. High internal consistency was demonstrated with all four factor loadings. Correlations between items in the ABCs, PROMIS, and BPI resulted in moderate to strong correlations demonstrating strong evidence for the validity of the ABCs as a functional pain assessment tool.\",\"PeriodicalId\":501393,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"medRxiv - Pain Medicine\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"medRxiv - Pain Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.01.29.24301629\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"medRxiv - Pain Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.01.29.24301629","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

基于活动的疼痛检查(ABCs)是一种疼痛评估工具,包含日常生活活动和工具性日常生活活动。与广泛使用的疼痛量表不同的是,疼痛量表往往是单维度的,主观性很强,而 ABCs 的设计侧重于患者的功能能力和因疼痛而受到的限制。本研究旨在验证 ABCs 的因子结构,并评估其在慢性疼痛患者中的使用情况。研究人员分两个阶段从 Prolific 招募;Prolific 是一项在线服务,旨在根据研究标准确定研究人员的招募。第一阶段优化了 ABCs 的设计,由 297 名受试者为每项功能选择自己喜欢的图标,并对其易懂程度进行评分。在第二阶段,304 名慢性疼痛受试者完成了 ABCs、PROMIS-29、与 ABCs 功能类似但未在 PROMIS-29 中体现的其他 PROMIS 项目以及简明疼痛量表 (BPI)。采用探索性因子分析和确认性因子分析对数据进行了分析,结果显示有四个因子载荷:多肛门活动、坐立/髋屈肌疼痛、行走/走动和疼痛对轻便的单侧活动的干扰。所有四个因子载荷均显示出较高的内部一致性。ABCs、PROMIS 和 BPI 项目之间的相关性为中度到高度相关,这有力地证明了 ABCs 作为功能性疼痛评估工具的有效性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Development and Validation of The Activity-Based Checks (ABCs) of Pain: A Functional Pain Scale
The Activity Based-Checks of Pain (ABCs) is a pain assessment tool incorporating activities of daily living and instrumental activities of daily living. Unlike widely used pain scales which are oftentimes unidimensional and highly subjective, the ABCs was designed to focus on function capabilities and limitations of patients due to pain. This study sought out to validate the factorial structure of the ABCs and assess its use in participants with chronic pain. Participants were recruited in two phases from Prolific; an online service designed to identify research participant recruitment based on study criteria. Phase one optimized the design of the ABCs, with 297 subjects selecting their preferred icon for each function and rating its understandability. The most preferred and understandable icons were then used in phase two, where 304 chronic pain participants completed the ABCs, PROMIS-29, additional PROMIS items that were analogous to the ABCs functions but not represented in the PROMIS-29, and the Brief Pain Inventory (BPI). Data was analyzed using exploratory factor analysis and confirmatory factor analysis demonstrating four factor loadings: multi-planal activities, sitting/hip flexor pain, walking/ambulation, and pain interference with lightweight unilateral activities. High internal consistency was demonstrated with all four factor loadings. Correlations between items in the ABCs, PROMIS, and BPI resulted in moderate to strong correlations demonstrating strong evidence for the validity of the ABCs as a functional pain assessment tool.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Subcallosal Cingulate structural connectivity as a biomarker for chronic low back pain Women with fibromyalgia: Insights into behavioral and brain imaging Towards validation of clinical measures to discriminate between nociceptive, neuropathic and nociplastic pain: cluster analysis of a cohort with chronic musculoskeletal pain Pain-related white-matter changes following mild traumatic brain injury: A longitudinal diffusion tensor imaging pilot study Mitigating the Opioid Epidemic: The Role of Cannabinoids in Chronic Pain Management - A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Clinical Evidence and Mechanisms
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1