国家风险评级能否解释影子银行的发展?先进经济体和新兴市场经济体的启示

IF 2.8 2区 经济学 Q1 ECONOMICS Economic Systems Pub Date : 2024-06-01 DOI:10.1016/j.ecosys.2024.101192
Seyed Alireza Athari , Mugabil Isayev , Farid Irani
{"title":"国家风险评级能否解释影子银行的发展?先进经济体和新兴市场经济体的启示","authors":"Seyed Alireza Athari ,&nbsp;Mugabil Isayev ,&nbsp;Farid Irani","doi":"10.1016/j.ecosys.2024.101192","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>This study fills a research gap by specifically investigating the effect of country risk rating (CR) on shadow banking (SB) development from a global perspective using a dynamic panel estimation approach covering the period 2010–2019. Furthermore, the study explores whether a country's characteristics impact this nexus by grouping countries into advanced and emerging market economies based on their development level. To the best of our knowledge, few empirical studies have been conducted looking into this relationship from this perspective, and these findings open a new debate in banking literature. The empirical results reveal that CR positively impacts SB in advanced, emerging, and global samples of countries, implying that lower vulnerability to risk factors<span><span> causes SB expansion. In addition, the results highlight that traditional macroeconomic and institutional factors impact SB development, although the extent of the effect and statistical significance of the factors vary and depend on countries' development levels. Remarkably, the empirical results confirm the validity of the complementarity and regulatory arbitrage hypotheses and support the possible asymmetric implications of </span>monetary policy on SB. The results are robust when alternative model specifications are used and have significant implications for policymakers and regulatory bodies.</span></p></div>","PeriodicalId":51505,"journal":{"name":"Economic Systems","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Does country risk rating explain shadow banking development? Insights from advanced and emerging market economies\",\"authors\":\"Seyed Alireza Athari ,&nbsp;Mugabil Isayev ,&nbsp;Farid Irani\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ecosys.2024.101192\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>This study fills a research gap by specifically investigating the effect of country risk rating (CR) on shadow banking (SB) development from a global perspective using a dynamic panel estimation approach covering the period 2010–2019. Furthermore, the study explores whether a country's characteristics impact this nexus by grouping countries into advanced and emerging market economies based on their development level. To the best of our knowledge, few empirical studies have been conducted looking into this relationship from this perspective, and these findings open a new debate in banking literature. The empirical results reveal that CR positively impacts SB in advanced, emerging, and global samples of countries, implying that lower vulnerability to risk factors<span><span> causes SB expansion. In addition, the results highlight that traditional macroeconomic and institutional factors impact SB development, although the extent of the effect and statistical significance of the factors vary and depend on countries' development levels. Remarkably, the empirical results confirm the validity of the complementarity and regulatory arbitrage hypotheses and support the possible asymmetric implications of </span>monetary policy on SB. The results are robust when alternative model specifications are used and have significant implications for policymakers and regulatory bodies.</span></p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51505,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Economic Systems\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Economic Systems\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0939362524000141\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ECONOMICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Economic Systems","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0939362524000141","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究从全球视角出发,采用动态面板估算方法,对 2010-2019 年期间国家风险评级(CR)对影子银行(SB)发展的影响进行了专门调查,从而填补了研究空白。此外,本研究还根据各国的发展水平将其分为发达经济体和新兴市场经济体,从而探讨了国家特征是否会影响这一关系。据我们所知,很少有实证研究从这一角度探讨这种关系,这些发现为银行文献开辟了新的讨论领域。实证结果表明,在先进国家、新兴国家和全球样本国家中,公司责任对储蓄银行都有积极影响,这意味着较低的风险因素脆弱性会导致储蓄银行的扩张。此外,实证结果还强调,传统的宏观经济和制度因素也会影响 SB 的发展,尽管这些因素的影响程度和统计显著性因国家的发展水平而异。值得注意的是,实证结果证实了互补性假说和监管套利假说的有效性,并支持货币政策可能对证券交易产生的非对称影响。当使用其他模型规格时,结果是稳健的,对政策制定者和监管机构具有重要意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Does country risk rating explain shadow banking development? Insights from advanced and emerging market economies

This study fills a research gap by specifically investigating the effect of country risk rating (CR) on shadow banking (SB) development from a global perspective using a dynamic panel estimation approach covering the period 2010–2019. Furthermore, the study explores whether a country's characteristics impact this nexus by grouping countries into advanced and emerging market economies based on their development level. To the best of our knowledge, few empirical studies have been conducted looking into this relationship from this perspective, and these findings open a new debate in banking literature. The empirical results reveal that CR positively impacts SB in advanced, emerging, and global samples of countries, implying that lower vulnerability to risk factors causes SB expansion. In addition, the results highlight that traditional macroeconomic and institutional factors impact SB development, although the extent of the effect and statistical significance of the factors vary and depend on countries' development levels. Remarkably, the empirical results confirm the validity of the complementarity and regulatory arbitrage hypotheses and support the possible asymmetric implications of monetary policy on SB. The results are robust when alternative model specifications are used and have significant implications for policymakers and regulatory bodies.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Economic Systems
Economic Systems ECONOMICS-
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
83
审稿时长
48 days
期刊介绍: Economic Systems is a refereed journal for the analysis of causes and consequences of the significant institutional variety prevailing among developed, developing, and emerging economies, as well as attempts at and proposals for their reform. The journal is open to micro and macro contributions, theoretical as well as empirical, the latter to analyze related topics against the background of country or region-specific experiences. In this respect, Economic Systems retains its long standing interest in the emerging economies of Central and Eastern Europe and other former transition economies, but also encourages contributions that cover any part of the world, including Asia, Latin America, the Middle East, or Africa.
期刊最新文献
Regional (economic) integration, political stability uncertainty and (intra-African) exports Editorial Board US uncertainty shocks on real and financial markets: A multi-country perspective Geographic complexity and bank risk: Evidence from cross-border banks in Africa Supporting African union: Do macroeconomic fluctuations matter?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1