Farah Yasmin, Abdul Moeed, R. Ochani, Hamna Raheel, Malik Ali Ehtsham Awan, Ayesha Liaquat, Arisha Saleem, Muhammad Aamir, Nael Hawwa, Salim Surani
{"title":"左束支阻滞心衰患者的左束支起搏与双心室起搏:系统回顾与荟萃分析","authors":"Farah Yasmin, Abdul Moeed, R. Ochani, Hamna Raheel, Malik Ali Ehtsham Awan, Ayesha Liaquat, Arisha Saleem, Muhammad Aamir, Nael Hawwa, Salim Surani","doi":"10.4330/wjc.v16.i1.40","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"BACKGROUND\n Left bundle branch pacing (LBBP) is a novel pacing modality of cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) that achieves more physiologic native ventricular activation than biventricular pacing (BiVP).\n AIM\n To explore the validity of electromechanical resynchronization, clinical and echocardiographic response of LBBP-CRT.\n METHODS\n Systematic review and Meta-analysis were conducted in accordance with the standard guidelines as mentioned in detail in the methodology section.\n RESULTS\n In our analysis, the success rate of LBBP-CRT was determined to be 91.1%. LBBP-CRT significantly shortened QRS duration, with significant improvement in echocardiographic parameters, including left ventricular ejection fraction, left ventricular end-diastolic diameter and left ventricular end-systolic diameter in comparison with BiVP-CRT.\n CONCLUSION\n A significant reduction in New York Heart Association class and B-type natriuretic peptide levels was also observed in the LBBP-CRT group vs BiVP-CRT group. Lastly, the LBBP-CRT cohort had a reduced pacing threshold at follow-up as compared to BiVP-CRT.","PeriodicalId":23800,"journal":{"name":"World Journal of Cardiology","volume":"53 29","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Left bundle branch pacing vs biventricular pacing in heart failure patients with left bundle branch block: A systematic review and meta-analysis\",\"authors\":\"Farah Yasmin, Abdul Moeed, R. Ochani, Hamna Raheel, Malik Ali Ehtsham Awan, Ayesha Liaquat, Arisha Saleem, Muhammad Aamir, Nael Hawwa, Salim Surani\",\"doi\":\"10.4330/wjc.v16.i1.40\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"BACKGROUND\\n Left bundle branch pacing (LBBP) is a novel pacing modality of cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) that achieves more physiologic native ventricular activation than biventricular pacing (BiVP).\\n AIM\\n To explore the validity of electromechanical resynchronization, clinical and echocardiographic response of LBBP-CRT.\\n METHODS\\n Systematic review and Meta-analysis were conducted in accordance with the standard guidelines as mentioned in detail in the methodology section.\\n RESULTS\\n In our analysis, the success rate of LBBP-CRT was determined to be 91.1%. LBBP-CRT significantly shortened QRS duration, with significant improvement in echocardiographic parameters, including left ventricular ejection fraction, left ventricular end-diastolic diameter and left ventricular end-systolic diameter in comparison with BiVP-CRT.\\n CONCLUSION\\n A significant reduction in New York Heart Association class and B-type natriuretic peptide levels was also observed in the LBBP-CRT group vs BiVP-CRT group. Lastly, the LBBP-CRT cohort had a reduced pacing threshold at follow-up as compared to BiVP-CRT.\",\"PeriodicalId\":23800,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"World Journal of Cardiology\",\"volume\":\"53 29\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"World Journal of Cardiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4330/wjc.v16.i1.40\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"World Journal of Cardiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4330/wjc.v16.i1.40","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
Left bundle branch pacing vs biventricular pacing in heart failure patients with left bundle branch block: A systematic review and meta-analysis
BACKGROUND
Left bundle branch pacing (LBBP) is a novel pacing modality of cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) that achieves more physiologic native ventricular activation than biventricular pacing (BiVP).
AIM
To explore the validity of electromechanical resynchronization, clinical and echocardiographic response of LBBP-CRT.
METHODS
Systematic review and Meta-analysis were conducted in accordance with the standard guidelines as mentioned in detail in the methodology section.
RESULTS
In our analysis, the success rate of LBBP-CRT was determined to be 91.1%. LBBP-CRT significantly shortened QRS duration, with significant improvement in echocardiographic parameters, including left ventricular ejection fraction, left ventricular end-diastolic diameter and left ventricular end-systolic diameter in comparison with BiVP-CRT.
CONCLUSION
A significant reduction in New York Heart Association class and B-type natriuretic peptide levels was also observed in the LBBP-CRT group vs BiVP-CRT group. Lastly, the LBBP-CRT cohort had a reduced pacing threshold at follow-up as compared to BiVP-CRT.