PMC 成员:雇佣兵或军事专业人员

Tatyana M. Lopatina
{"title":"PMC 成员:雇佣兵或军事专业人员","authors":"Tatyana M. Lopatina","doi":"10.18572/2070-2108-2024-1-14-17","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The presence of legal uncertainty in the status of a professional military of a private military campaign leads to real risks of classifying them as mercenaries. The article provides concrete examples of the development of a common regulatory platform for the legal regulation of the status of fighters of private military companies (hereinafter — PMCs) on the example of international conventions and the experience of individual states. The analysis carried out indicates the need to apply the accumulated international experience to legally consolidate the legal status of a PMCs employee in national legislation, since they do not fall under the definition of a mercenary existing in the criminal legislation of the Russian Federation. In addition to the problems outlined in the article, there are other legal aspects. Thus, neither international cooperation nor the national legislation of most States are yet ready to unify the approach to determining the legal basis for the use of mercenary armed formations to solve internal problems and their use outside the State.","PeriodicalId":270614,"journal":{"name":"Military juridical journal","volume":"115 23","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A PMC Member: А Mercenary or a Military Professional\",\"authors\":\"Tatyana M. Lopatina\",\"doi\":\"10.18572/2070-2108-2024-1-14-17\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The presence of legal uncertainty in the status of a professional military of a private military campaign leads to real risks of classifying them as mercenaries. The article provides concrete examples of the development of a common regulatory platform for the legal regulation of the status of fighters of private military companies (hereinafter — PMCs) on the example of international conventions and the experience of individual states. The analysis carried out indicates the need to apply the accumulated international experience to legally consolidate the legal status of a PMCs employee in national legislation, since they do not fall under the definition of a mercenary existing in the criminal legislation of the Russian Federation. In addition to the problems outlined in the article, there are other legal aspects. Thus, neither international cooperation nor the national legislation of most States are yet ready to unify the approach to determining the legal basis for the use of mercenary armed formations to solve internal problems and their use outside the State.\",\"PeriodicalId\":270614,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Military juridical journal\",\"volume\":\"115 23\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Military juridical journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.18572/2070-2108-2024-1-14-17\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Military juridical journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18572/2070-2108-2024-1-14-17","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

私营军事活动的职业军人地位在法律上的不确定性导致了将他们归类为雇佣军的实际风险。文章以国际公约和个别国家的经验为例,提供了发展共同监管平台的具体实例,以便对私营军事公司(以下简称私营军事公司)战士的地位进行法律监管。分析表明,有必要运用积累的国际经验,在国家立法中从法律上巩固私营军事公司雇员的法律地位, 因为他们不属于俄罗斯联邦刑事立法中现有雇佣军定义的范畴。除了文章中概述的问题外,还有其他法律方面的问题。因此,无论是国际合作还是大多数国家的国内立法,都尚未准备好统一办法,确定使用雇佣军武装编队解决国内问题和在境外使用雇佣军的法律依据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
A PMC Member: А Mercenary or a Military Professional
The presence of legal uncertainty in the status of a professional military of a private military campaign leads to real risks of classifying them as mercenaries. The article provides concrete examples of the development of a common regulatory platform for the legal regulation of the status of fighters of private military companies (hereinafter — PMCs) on the example of international conventions and the experience of individual states. The analysis carried out indicates the need to apply the accumulated international experience to legally consolidate the legal status of a PMCs employee in national legislation, since they do not fall under the definition of a mercenary existing in the criminal legislation of the Russian Federation. In addition to the problems outlined in the article, there are other legal aspects. Thus, neither international cooperation nor the national legislation of most States are yet ready to unify the approach to determining the legal basis for the use of mercenary armed formations to solve internal problems and their use outside the State.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Criminal Proceedings in Absentia: Reflections during the Special Military Operation National Security Authorities: Terminology Features Private Military Companies of the 21st Century as Mission-Oriented Corporations Legal and Organizational Determinants of the Structure of Military Ministries and Departments Barrack Hooliganism (Art. 335 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation). Article 1. On the History and Essence of the Issue
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1