通过全球、大陆、区域和特定事件模型的组合,对 2023 年土耳其地震序列进行地理空间液化建模

Adel Asadi, Christina Sanon, E. Cakir, Weiwei Zhan, Hooman Shirzadi, Laurie Gaskins Baise, K. Onder Cetin, Babak Moaveni
{"title":"通过全球、大陆、区域和特定事件模型的组合,对 2023 年土耳其地震序列进行地理空间液化建模","authors":"Adel Asadi, Christina Sanon, E. Cakir, Weiwei Zhan, Hooman Shirzadi, Laurie Gaskins Baise, K. Onder Cetin, Babak Moaveni","doi":"10.1785/0220230287","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n A global geospatial liquefaction model (GGLM-2017) was previously developed (Zhu et al., 2017) using logistic regression (LR) and is currently used by the U.S. Geological Survey as the preferred liquefaction model to map liquefaction probability immediately after the occurrence of earthquake events. This research proposes an ensemble modeling approach to improve the performance of the GGLM-2017 for geospatial liquefaction modeling of the 2023 Türkiye earthquakes using an updated inventory of liquefaction occurrence locations in Europe (the OpenLIQ database, which includes prior events occurring in Türkiye) and a new inventory from the 2023 Türkiye earthquakes (gathered from multiple sources). Using the same geospatial proxies for soil saturation, soil density, and earthquake loading, and the same non-liquefaction sampling strategy used to develop GGLM-2017, the proposed ensemble method is validated on the data of the 2023 Türkiye earthquakes by integrating four models, including global (GGLM-2017), continental (LR model trained on eight European events), regional (LR model trained on three historical events in Türkiye), and event-specific (LR model trained on partially available data from the 2023 Türkiye earthquakes) models. The inventory from the 2023 Türkiye earthquakes is split into two batches, in which the first batch (163 liquefaction occurrences) resulted from the preliminary reconnaissance and is used for training the event-specific model, and the second batch (284 liquefaction occurrences) resulted from a more complete reconnaissance (which was made available later) and is used for validating all models. The rationale for using the first batch for training the event-specific model is to exploit the information as they become available to optimize the performance of global model in liquefaction prediction. The final ensemble probability assignment is done by averaging the probabilities derived by the four individual models, and a 50% threshold is used for classification accuracy evaluations. Comparative analysis of the ensemble model’s performance with the GGLM-2017 showed improved predictive accuracy, resulting in higher liquefaction detection for the specific event under study (the 2023 Türkiye earthquakes). The ensemble model also provides an estimate of model uncertainty.","PeriodicalId":508466,"journal":{"name":"Seismological Research Letters","volume":"42 24","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Geospatial Liquefaction Modeling of the 2023 Türkiye Earthquake Sequence by an Ensemble of Global, Continental, Regional, and Event-Specific Models\",\"authors\":\"Adel Asadi, Christina Sanon, E. Cakir, Weiwei Zhan, Hooman Shirzadi, Laurie Gaskins Baise, K. Onder Cetin, Babak Moaveni\",\"doi\":\"10.1785/0220230287\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n A global geospatial liquefaction model (GGLM-2017) was previously developed (Zhu et al., 2017) using logistic regression (LR) and is currently used by the U.S. Geological Survey as the preferred liquefaction model to map liquefaction probability immediately after the occurrence of earthquake events. This research proposes an ensemble modeling approach to improve the performance of the GGLM-2017 for geospatial liquefaction modeling of the 2023 Türkiye earthquakes using an updated inventory of liquefaction occurrence locations in Europe (the OpenLIQ database, which includes prior events occurring in Türkiye) and a new inventory from the 2023 Türkiye earthquakes (gathered from multiple sources). Using the same geospatial proxies for soil saturation, soil density, and earthquake loading, and the same non-liquefaction sampling strategy used to develop GGLM-2017, the proposed ensemble method is validated on the data of the 2023 Türkiye earthquakes by integrating four models, including global (GGLM-2017), continental (LR model trained on eight European events), regional (LR model trained on three historical events in Türkiye), and event-specific (LR model trained on partially available data from the 2023 Türkiye earthquakes) models. The inventory from the 2023 Türkiye earthquakes is split into two batches, in which the first batch (163 liquefaction occurrences) resulted from the preliminary reconnaissance and is used for training the event-specific model, and the second batch (284 liquefaction occurrences) resulted from a more complete reconnaissance (which was made available later) and is used for validating all models. The rationale for using the first batch for training the event-specific model is to exploit the information as they become available to optimize the performance of global model in liquefaction prediction. The final ensemble probability assignment is done by averaging the probabilities derived by the four individual models, and a 50% threshold is used for classification accuracy evaluations. Comparative analysis of the ensemble model’s performance with the GGLM-2017 showed improved predictive accuracy, resulting in higher liquefaction detection for the specific event under study (the 2023 Türkiye earthquakes). The ensemble model also provides an estimate of model uncertainty.\",\"PeriodicalId\":508466,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Seismological Research Letters\",\"volume\":\"42 24\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Seismological Research Letters\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1785/0220230287\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Seismological Research Letters","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1785/0220230287","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

此前,利用逻辑回归(LR)技术开发了全球地理空间液化模型(GGLM-2017)(Zhu 等,2017 年),目前美国地质调查局将其作为首选液化模型,用于绘制地震事件发生后的液化概率图。本研究提出了一种集合建模方法,利用欧洲液化发生地点的最新清单(OpenLIQ 数据库,其中包括之前在土耳其发生的事件)和 2023 年土耳其地震的新清单(从多个来源收集),提高 GGLM-2017 在 2023 年土耳其地震的地理空间液化建模中的性能。使用与开发 GGLM-2017 相同的土壤饱和度、土壤密度和地震荷载的地理空间代用指标,以及与开发 GGLM-2017 相同的非液化采样策略,通过整合四个模型,包括全球模型(GGLM-2017)、大陆模型(根据八个欧洲事件训练的 LR 模型)、区域模型(根据三个土尔其历史事件训练的 LR 模型)和特定事件模型(根据 2023 年土尔其地震的部分可用数据训练的 LR 模型),在 2023 年土尔其地震的数据上验证了提议的集合方法。2023 年土尔其地震的清单分为两批,其中第一批(163 起液化事件)来自初步勘测,用于训练特定事件模型;第二批(284 起液化事件)来自更完整的勘测(随后提供),用于验证所有模型。使用第一批数据来训练特定事件模型的理由是,在信息可用时加以利用,以优化全局模型在液化预测中的性能。最终的集合概率分配是通过平均四个单独模型得出的概率来完成的,并使用 50%的阈值来进行分类准确性评估。对集合模型与 GGLM-2017 的性能进行的比较分析表明,集合模型的预测精度有所提高,从而提高了所研究的特定事件(2023 年土耳其地震)的液化检测率。集合模型还提供了对模型不确定性的估计。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Geospatial Liquefaction Modeling of the 2023 Türkiye Earthquake Sequence by an Ensemble of Global, Continental, Regional, and Event-Specific Models
A global geospatial liquefaction model (GGLM-2017) was previously developed (Zhu et al., 2017) using logistic regression (LR) and is currently used by the U.S. Geological Survey as the preferred liquefaction model to map liquefaction probability immediately after the occurrence of earthquake events. This research proposes an ensemble modeling approach to improve the performance of the GGLM-2017 for geospatial liquefaction modeling of the 2023 Türkiye earthquakes using an updated inventory of liquefaction occurrence locations in Europe (the OpenLIQ database, which includes prior events occurring in Türkiye) and a new inventory from the 2023 Türkiye earthquakes (gathered from multiple sources). Using the same geospatial proxies for soil saturation, soil density, and earthquake loading, and the same non-liquefaction sampling strategy used to develop GGLM-2017, the proposed ensemble method is validated on the data of the 2023 Türkiye earthquakes by integrating four models, including global (GGLM-2017), continental (LR model trained on eight European events), regional (LR model trained on three historical events in Türkiye), and event-specific (LR model trained on partially available data from the 2023 Türkiye earthquakes) models. The inventory from the 2023 Türkiye earthquakes is split into two batches, in which the first batch (163 liquefaction occurrences) resulted from the preliminary reconnaissance and is used for training the event-specific model, and the second batch (284 liquefaction occurrences) resulted from a more complete reconnaissance (which was made available later) and is used for validating all models. The rationale for using the first batch for training the event-specific model is to exploit the information as they become available to optimize the performance of global model in liquefaction prediction. The final ensemble probability assignment is done by averaging the probabilities derived by the four individual models, and a 50% threshold is used for classification accuracy evaluations. Comparative analysis of the ensemble model’s performance with the GGLM-2017 showed improved predictive accuracy, resulting in higher liquefaction detection for the specific event under study (the 2023 Türkiye earthquakes). The ensemble model also provides an estimate of model uncertainty.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
A Geodetic-Based Earthquake Early Warning System for Colombia and Ecuador Constraining the Geometry of the Northwest Pacific Slab Using Deep Clustering of Slab Guided Waves An Empirically Constrained Forecasting Strategy for Induced Earthquake Magnitudes Using Extreme Value Theory A Software Tool for Hybrid Earthquake Forecasting in New Zealand DASPy: A Python Toolbox for DAS Seismology
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1