英语和阿拉伯语短篇小说主题结构功能的对比研究

W. A. Hatab, Mohammad Khaleel, Mohammed AL-Badawi, Alalddin Al-Tarawneh
{"title":"英语和阿拉伯语短篇小说主题结构功能的对比研究","authors":"W. A. Hatab, Mohammad Khaleel, Mohammed AL-Badawi, Alalddin Al-Tarawneh","doi":"10.5430/wjel.v14n2p324","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Charles Dickens’s (1909) “Little Dorrit” and Al Tayeb Saleh’s (1997) “Nakhla Ala Al Jadwal” were the subject of this investigation. Using Halliday and Matthiessen’s (2014) model of thematic categorizations and functions, this research paper examined thematic structure functions in relation to Dickens’s and Saleh’s short stories. Hence, 234 English and 304 Arabic clauses were manually extracted from the short stories and analyzed regarding the proposed framework. The findings revealed that the use of topical themes was the highest and the interpersonal was the lowest in frequency while the textual themes were at some point in between the topical and interpersonal ones. The comparison also had no bearing on the topical themes because they were identical, but the textual and interpersonal themes recorded distinct results. In Arabic, the utilization of textual themes was higher but the implementation of interpersonal themes was more employed and exercised in English. Each of which indicates multifarious reasons and functions to be regarded to the author’s vantage point.","PeriodicalId":505938,"journal":{"name":"World Journal of English Language","volume":"42 6","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Contrastive Study on the Thematic Structure Functions of English and Arabic Short Stories\",\"authors\":\"W. A. Hatab, Mohammad Khaleel, Mohammed AL-Badawi, Alalddin Al-Tarawneh\",\"doi\":\"10.5430/wjel.v14n2p324\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Charles Dickens’s (1909) “Little Dorrit” and Al Tayeb Saleh’s (1997) “Nakhla Ala Al Jadwal” were the subject of this investigation. Using Halliday and Matthiessen’s (2014) model of thematic categorizations and functions, this research paper examined thematic structure functions in relation to Dickens’s and Saleh’s short stories. Hence, 234 English and 304 Arabic clauses were manually extracted from the short stories and analyzed regarding the proposed framework. The findings revealed that the use of topical themes was the highest and the interpersonal was the lowest in frequency while the textual themes were at some point in between the topical and interpersonal ones. The comparison also had no bearing on the topical themes because they were identical, but the textual and interpersonal themes recorded distinct results. In Arabic, the utilization of textual themes was higher but the implementation of interpersonal themes was more employed and exercised in English. Each of which indicates multifarious reasons and functions to be regarded to the author’s vantage point.\",\"PeriodicalId\":505938,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"World Journal of English Language\",\"volume\":\"42 6\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"World Journal of English Language\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5430/wjel.v14n2p324\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"World Journal of English Language","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5430/wjel.v14n2p324","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

查尔斯-狄更斯(1909 年)的《小杜丽》和 Al Tayeb Saleh(1997 年)的《Nakhla Ala Al Jadwal》是本研究的主题。本研究论文采用 Halliday 和 Matthiessen(2014 年)的主题分类和功能模型,研究了狄更斯和萨利赫短篇小说的主题结构功能。因此,本文从短篇小说中人工提取了 234 个英语分句和 304 个阿拉伯语分句,并根据提出的框架进行了分析。研究结果表明,专题主题的使用频率最高,人际主题的使用频率最低,而文本主题的使用频率则介于专题主题和人际主题之间。比较结果也与主题无关,因为它们是相同的,但文本主题和人际主题的结果却截然不同。在阿拉伯语中,文本主题的使用率较高,但在英语中,人际主题的使用率更高。这一切都表明,作者的视角具有多方面的原因和作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
A Contrastive Study on the Thematic Structure Functions of English and Arabic Short Stories
Charles Dickens’s (1909) “Little Dorrit” and Al Tayeb Saleh’s (1997) “Nakhla Ala Al Jadwal” were the subject of this investigation. Using Halliday and Matthiessen’s (2014) model of thematic categorizations and functions, this research paper examined thematic structure functions in relation to Dickens’s and Saleh’s short stories. Hence, 234 English and 304 Arabic clauses were manually extracted from the short stories and analyzed regarding the proposed framework. The findings revealed that the use of topical themes was the highest and the interpersonal was the lowest in frequency while the textual themes were at some point in between the topical and interpersonal ones. The comparison also had no bearing on the topical themes because they were identical, but the textual and interpersonal themes recorded distinct results. In Arabic, the utilization of textual themes was higher but the implementation of interpersonal themes was more employed and exercised in English. Each of which indicates multifarious reasons and functions to be regarded to the author’s vantage point.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Reviewer Acknowledgements for World Journal of English Language, Vol. 14, No. 5 The Impact of Technology on the Motivation of English Language Learners in Online Settings Digital Game-Based Learning in Higher Education: ESL Teachers and Students Perceptions The Reality and Effects of Using Duolingo to Develop English Language Skills for EFL Learners in Jordan Wealth/Poverty Opposition in English and Kazakh: A Comparative Study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1