{"title":"前馈相互信息异常检测:应用于自动驾驶汽车","authors":"Sasha M. McKee, Osama Haddadin, Kam K. Leang","doi":"10.1115/1.4064519","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n This paper describes a mutual-information-based approach that exploits a dynamics model to quantify and detect anomalies for applications such as autonomous vehicles. First, mutual information (MI) is utilized to quantify the level of uncertainty associated with the behaviors of the vehicle. The MI approach handles novel anomalies without the need for data-intensive training; and the metric readily applies to multivariate datasets for improved robustness, compared to for example, measures such as vehicle tracking error. Second, to further improve the response time of anomaly detection, the vehicle-dynamics model is used to create a predicted component that is combined with current and past measurements. This approach compensates for the lag in the anomaly detection process compared to strictly using current and past measurements. Finally, three different MI-based strategies are described and compared experimentally: anomaly detection using MI with (1) current and past measurements (reaction), (2) current and future information (prediction), and (3) a combination of past and future information (reaction-prediction) with three different time windows. The experiments demonstrate quantification and detection of anomalies in three driving situations: (1) veering off the road, (2) driving on the wrong side of the road, and (3) swerving within a lane. Results show that by anticipating the movements of the vehicle, the quality and response time of the anomaly detection is more favorable for decision-making while not raising false alarms compared to just using current and past measurements.","PeriodicalId":164923,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Autonomous Vehicles and Systems","volume":"87 22","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Feedforward Mutual-Information Anomaly Detection: Application to Autonomous Vehicles\",\"authors\":\"Sasha M. McKee, Osama Haddadin, Kam K. Leang\",\"doi\":\"10.1115/1.4064519\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n This paper describes a mutual-information-based approach that exploits a dynamics model to quantify and detect anomalies for applications such as autonomous vehicles. First, mutual information (MI) is utilized to quantify the level of uncertainty associated with the behaviors of the vehicle. The MI approach handles novel anomalies without the need for data-intensive training; and the metric readily applies to multivariate datasets for improved robustness, compared to for example, measures such as vehicle tracking error. Second, to further improve the response time of anomaly detection, the vehicle-dynamics model is used to create a predicted component that is combined with current and past measurements. This approach compensates for the lag in the anomaly detection process compared to strictly using current and past measurements. Finally, three different MI-based strategies are described and compared experimentally: anomaly detection using MI with (1) current and past measurements (reaction), (2) current and future information (prediction), and (3) a combination of past and future information (reaction-prediction) with three different time windows. The experiments demonstrate quantification and detection of anomalies in three driving situations: (1) veering off the road, (2) driving on the wrong side of the road, and (3) swerving within a lane. Results show that by anticipating the movements of the vehicle, the quality and response time of the anomaly detection is more favorable for decision-making while not raising false alarms compared to just using current and past measurements.\",\"PeriodicalId\":164923,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Autonomous Vehicles and Systems\",\"volume\":\"87 22\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Autonomous Vehicles and Systems\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4064519\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Autonomous Vehicles and Systems","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4064519","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Feedforward Mutual-Information Anomaly Detection: Application to Autonomous Vehicles
This paper describes a mutual-information-based approach that exploits a dynamics model to quantify and detect anomalies for applications such as autonomous vehicles. First, mutual information (MI) is utilized to quantify the level of uncertainty associated with the behaviors of the vehicle. The MI approach handles novel anomalies without the need for data-intensive training; and the metric readily applies to multivariate datasets for improved robustness, compared to for example, measures such as vehicle tracking error. Second, to further improve the response time of anomaly detection, the vehicle-dynamics model is used to create a predicted component that is combined with current and past measurements. This approach compensates for the lag in the anomaly detection process compared to strictly using current and past measurements. Finally, three different MI-based strategies are described and compared experimentally: anomaly detection using MI with (1) current and past measurements (reaction), (2) current and future information (prediction), and (3) a combination of past and future information (reaction-prediction) with three different time windows. The experiments demonstrate quantification and detection of anomalies in three driving situations: (1) veering off the road, (2) driving on the wrong side of the road, and (3) swerving within a lane. Results show that by anticipating the movements of the vehicle, the quality and response time of the anomaly detection is more favorable for decision-making while not raising false alarms compared to just using current and past measurements.