导言:MoHoA 特邀编辑

IF 1 4区 社会学 0 HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Curator: The Museum Journal Pub Date : 2024-01-22 DOI:10.1111/cura.12585
Edward Denison, Shahid Vawda
{"title":"导言:MoHoA 特邀编辑","authors":"Edward Denison,&nbsp;Shahid Vawda","doi":"10.1111/cura.12585","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>This special edition of Curator on <i>Modern Heritage in the Anthropocene</i> draws on the 2nd International MoHoA conference of the same title held from October 26 to 28, 2022, at The Bartlett School of Architecture, University College London (UK), in partnership with the University of Liverpool's School of Architecture. As a global collaborative established in 2020, MoHoA is concerned with decentring the theory and practice of modern heritage and joins the wider global effort to decolonize institutional practices that engage with the research, collection, valorization, or transformation of material culture associated with our collective recent past—from museum curators and creative practitioners to academics, and the built environment professions. Founded on the fact that our precarious present reflects an inequitable past and a perilous future, MoHoA asserts that modern heritage—inextricably bound as it is to Western notions of progress, modernization, and modernity—conceptually, practically, and as artifact, uniquely and disproportionately privileges western, invariably white, experiences and values. Unlike other kinds or classifications of heritage, modern heritage also reflects the existential paradox central to MoHoA whereby the cultural legacies of our recent past are simultaneously of modernity and yet threatened by its consequences. Through its workshops, conferences, publications, and website, MoHoA provides a platform for sharing knowledge, methods, and approaches that challenge the modernist canon and support the construction of new epistemologies centered not on race, color, or ethnicity but on humankind and our self-inflicted precarious position on this planet. This epistemic and canonical reconfiguration has important implications for museums and heritage practice globally as the reconstitution of modern heritage and its associated modes of knowledge production and registers will direct the composition of collections, lists, and archives away from mythologizing hegemonic Western epistemic traditions, to reflect instead decentred planetary experiences, whether human or non-human. An important outcome of this collective and restitutive endeavor is the publication of <i>The Cape Town Document on Modern Heritage</i>, an equitable and decentering policy proposal presented to UNESCO and its advisory bodies in 2023.</p>","PeriodicalId":10791,"journal":{"name":"Curator: The Museum Journal","volume":"67 1","pages":"7-19"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/cura.12585","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Introduction: MoHoA guest editorial\",\"authors\":\"Edward Denison,&nbsp;Shahid Vawda\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/cura.12585\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>This special edition of Curator on <i>Modern Heritage in the Anthropocene</i> draws on the 2nd International MoHoA conference of the same title held from October 26 to 28, 2022, at The Bartlett School of Architecture, University College London (UK), in partnership with the University of Liverpool's School of Architecture. As a global collaborative established in 2020, MoHoA is concerned with decentring the theory and practice of modern heritage and joins the wider global effort to decolonize institutional practices that engage with the research, collection, valorization, or transformation of material culture associated with our collective recent past—from museum curators and creative practitioners to academics, and the built environment professions. Founded on the fact that our precarious present reflects an inequitable past and a perilous future, MoHoA asserts that modern heritage—inextricably bound as it is to Western notions of progress, modernization, and modernity—conceptually, practically, and as artifact, uniquely and disproportionately privileges western, invariably white, experiences and values. Unlike other kinds or classifications of heritage, modern heritage also reflects the existential paradox central to MoHoA whereby the cultural legacies of our recent past are simultaneously of modernity and yet threatened by its consequences. Through its workshops, conferences, publications, and website, MoHoA provides a platform for sharing knowledge, methods, and approaches that challenge the modernist canon and support the construction of new epistemologies centered not on race, color, or ethnicity but on humankind and our self-inflicted precarious position on this planet. This epistemic and canonical reconfiguration has important implications for museums and heritage practice globally as the reconstitution of modern heritage and its associated modes of knowledge production and registers will direct the composition of collections, lists, and archives away from mythologizing hegemonic Western epistemic traditions, to reflect instead decentred planetary experiences, whether human or non-human. An important outcome of this collective and restitutive endeavor is the publication of <i>The Cape Town Document on Modern Heritage</i>, an equitable and decentering policy proposal presented to UNESCO and its advisory bodies in 2023.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10791,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Curator: The Museum Journal\",\"volume\":\"67 1\",\"pages\":\"7-19\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/cura.12585\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Curator: The Museum Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/cura.12585\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Curator: The Museum Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/cura.12585","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本期 "人类世现代遗产策展人 "特刊借鉴了2022年10月26日至28日在英国伦敦大学学院巴特利特建筑学院与利物浦大学建筑学院合作举办的第二届同名国际现代遗产策展人会议的成果。作为一个成立于2020年的全球性合作组织,MoHoA关注的是现代遗产理论与实践的去殖民化,并加入到更广泛的全球努力中,对从事与我们集体近代史相关的物质文化的研究、收集、估价或转化的机构实践进行去殖民化--从博物馆馆长和创意从业者到学术界和建筑环境专业。我们岌岌可危的现在反映了不公平的过去和危险的未来,基于这一事实,现代艺术博物馆认为,现代遗产--与西方的进步、现代化和现代性概念密不可分--在概念上、实践上以及作为艺术品,都独特地、不成比例地赋予了西方、无一例外是白人的经验和价值观以特权。与其他类型或分类的遗产不同,现代遗产还反映了现代艺术博物馆的核心存在悖论,即我们近代的文化遗产既是现代性的产物,又受到现代性后果的威胁。通过其研讨会、会议、出版物和网站,MoHoA 提供了一个分享知识、方法和途径的平台,这些知识、方法和途径对现代主义经典提出了挑战,并支持构建新的认识论,其核心不是种族、肤色或民族,而是人类和我们在这个星球上自我造成的岌岌可危的地位。这种认识论和典籍的重构对全球博物馆和遗产实践具有重要影响,因为现代遗产的重构及其相关的知识生产和登记模式将引导藏品、清单和档案的构成脱离神话化的西方霸权认识论传统,转而反映人类或非人类的体面的地球经验。开普敦现代遗产文件》的出版是这一集体修复努力的一项重要成果,它是一项公平和去中心化的政策建议,将于 2023 年提交给联合国教科文组织及其咨询机构。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Introduction: MoHoA guest editorial

This special edition of Curator on Modern Heritage in the Anthropocene draws on the 2nd International MoHoA conference of the same title held from October 26 to 28, 2022, at The Bartlett School of Architecture, University College London (UK), in partnership with the University of Liverpool's School of Architecture. As a global collaborative established in 2020, MoHoA is concerned with decentring the theory and practice of modern heritage and joins the wider global effort to decolonize institutional practices that engage with the research, collection, valorization, or transformation of material culture associated with our collective recent past—from museum curators and creative practitioners to academics, and the built environment professions. Founded on the fact that our precarious present reflects an inequitable past and a perilous future, MoHoA asserts that modern heritage—inextricably bound as it is to Western notions of progress, modernization, and modernity—conceptually, practically, and as artifact, uniquely and disproportionately privileges western, invariably white, experiences and values. Unlike other kinds or classifications of heritage, modern heritage also reflects the existential paradox central to MoHoA whereby the cultural legacies of our recent past are simultaneously of modernity and yet threatened by its consequences. Through its workshops, conferences, publications, and website, MoHoA provides a platform for sharing knowledge, methods, and approaches that challenge the modernist canon and support the construction of new epistemologies centered not on race, color, or ethnicity but on humankind and our self-inflicted precarious position on this planet. This epistemic and canonical reconfiguration has important implications for museums and heritage practice globally as the reconstitution of modern heritage and its associated modes of knowledge production and registers will direct the composition of collections, lists, and archives away from mythologizing hegemonic Western epistemic traditions, to reflect instead decentred planetary experiences, whether human or non-human. An important outcome of this collective and restitutive endeavor is the publication of The Cape Town Document on Modern Heritage, an equitable and decentering policy proposal presented to UNESCO and its advisory bodies in 2023.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Curator: The Museum Journal
Curator: The Museum Journal HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
10.00%
发文量
63
期刊最新文献
Invisible victims: How children's museums are strengthening families through partnerships with correctional facilities Holders of battered memories: Exploring suitcases as museum metaphors for travel, exile, and incarceration Objects of “imprisonment”: Diasporic museum collections on ethnographic display The W‐ICAD model: Redefining museum access through the Workshop for Inclusive Co‐created Audio Description Exploring virtual museums: Pre‐service teachers' experiences of virtual museums in gifted and talented education
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1