通过社区讨论实现复原力枢纽设计和交通的公平性

Findings Pub Date : 2024-01-18 DOI:10.32866/001c.91270
Sarah Wan, Stephen D. Wong
{"title":"通过社区讨论实现复原力枢纽设计和交通的公平性","authors":"Sarah Wan, Stephen D. Wong","doi":"10.32866/001c.91270","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This research highlights transportation, placement, and features of resilience hubs preferred by underserved populations, using Edmonton, Alberta as a case study. Semi-structured focus groups were conducted with eight different underserved populations (n=52), and thematic analysis was performed to determine common themes and inform equity-centered engineering design. By talking directly with community members, we found that resilience hubs should be placed in locations that are easily accessible by walking or public transit, and additional infrastructure is needed to meet users’ needs. Most underserved participants prefer locations that are close to their neighborhood, indicating a proximity-based approach for future implementation.","PeriodicalId":508951,"journal":{"name":"Findings","volume":"103 15","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Equity in Resilience Hub Design and Transportation through Community Discussions\",\"authors\":\"Sarah Wan, Stephen D. Wong\",\"doi\":\"10.32866/001c.91270\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This research highlights transportation, placement, and features of resilience hubs preferred by underserved populations, using Edmonton, Alberta as a case study. Semi-structured focus groups were conducted with eight different underserved populations (n=52), and thematic analysis was performed to determine common themes and inform equity-centered engineering design. By talking directly with community members, we found that resilience hubs should be placed in locations that are easily accessible by walking or public transit, and additional infrastructure is needed to meet users’ needs. Most underserved participants prefer locations that are close to their neighborhood, indicating a proximity-based approach for future implementation.\",\"PeriodicalId\":508951,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Findings\",\"volume\":\"103 15\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Findings\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.32866/001c.91270\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Findings","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.32866/001c.91270","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究以阿尔伯塔省埃德蒙顿市为案例,重点介绍了服务不足人群偏好的抗灾中心的交通、位置和特点。我们与八个不同的服务不足人群(n=52)进行了半结构化焦点小组讨论,并进行了主题分析,以确定共同的主题,为以公平为中心的工程设计提供信息。通过与社区成员直接交流,我们发现复原力中心应建在便于步行或乘坐公共交通到达的地点,并且需要额外的基础设施来满足用户的需求。大多数得不到充分服务的参与者倾向于选择靠近其社区的地点,这表明在未来的实施过程中应以就近原则为基础。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Equity in Resilience Hub Design and Transportation through Community Discussions
This research highlights transportation, placement, and features of resilience hubs preferred by underserved populations, using Edmonton, Alberta as a case study. Semi-structured focus groups were conducted with eight different underserved populations (n=52), and thematic analysis was performed to determine common themes and inform equity-centered engineering design. By talking directly with community members, we found that resilience hubs should be placed in locations that are easily accessible by walking or public transit, and additional infrastructure is needed to meet users’ needs. Most underserved participants prefer locations that are close to their neighborhood, indicating a proximity-based approach for future implementation.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Changes in Traffic Jams and Injuries Impact on Acceptability of Automated Vehicles: A Strong Curvilinear Relation with no signs of Loss Aversion. Day-of-Week, Month, and Seasonal Demand Variations: Comparing Flow Estimates Across New Travel Data Sources Human Mobility Patterns during the 2024 Total Solar Eclipse in Canada Substituting Car Trips: Does Intermodal Mobility Decrease External Costs and How Does It Affect Travel Times? An Analysis Based on GPS Tracking Data Revealed Preferences for Utilitarian Cycling Energy Expenditure versus Travel Time
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1