米罗斯拉夫-库西和米兰-滨田思想中的自由反思

M. Martinkovič
{"title":"米罗斯拉夫-库西和米兰-滨田思想中的自由反思","authors":"M. Martinkovič","doi":"10.31577/filozofia.2024.79.1.5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The study examines reflections on freedom in the thinking of two important representatives of the democratizing changes in Czecho-slovakia in the 1960s. Both Miroslav Kusý and Milan Hamada were among the original thinkers who dealt with the issue of the institutional and power determination of man and his freedom. Despite their different philosophical perspectives, both focused on seeking answers to questions about defining the conditions for the development of individual freedom, which was combined with an interest in the humanistic interpretation of Marxist philosophy. In this context, Kusý’s thinking concentrated on the practical problem of social democratization, which he defined using the term “institutional revolution.” In contrast to this perspective, the thinking of Milan Hamada was inspired by an interest in the issue of power interference in the creation of a space of personal freedom, which he interpreted from an existential-phenomenological point of view. The study will detail how both thinkers reflected on possible solutions to the struggle for freedom and human dignity, which is determined by the risk of a homogenising political power.","PeriodicalId":502748,"journal":{"name":"Filozofia","volume":" 18","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Reflexia slobody v myslení Miroslava Kusého a Milana Hamadu\",\"authors\":\"M. Martinkovič\",\"doi\":\"10.31577/filozofia.2024.79.1.5\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The study examines reflections on freedom in the thinking of two important representatives of the democratizing changes in Czecho-slovakia in the 1960s. Both Miroslav Kusý and Milan Hamada were among the original thinkers who dealt with the issue of the institutional and power determination of man and his freedom. Despite their different philosophical perspectives, both focused on seeking answers to questions about defining the conditions for the development of individual freedom, which was combined with an interest in the humanistic interpretation of Marxist philosophy. In this context, Kusý’s thinking concentrated on the practical problem of social democratization, which he defined using the term “institutional revolution.” In contrast to this perspective, the thinking of Milan Hamada was inspired by an interest in the issue of power interference in the creation of a space of personal freedom, which he interpreted from an existential-phenomenological point of view. The study will detail how both thinkers reflected on possible solutions to the struggle for freedom and human dignity, which is determined by the risk of a homogenising political power.\",\"PeriodicalId\":502748,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Filozofia\",\"volume\":\" 18\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Filozofia\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.31577/filozofia.2024.79.1.5\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Filozofia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31577/filozofia.2024.79.1.5","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究探讨了 20 世纪 60 年代捷克-斯洛伐克民主化变革的两位重要代表人物对自由的思考。米罗斯拉夫-库西(Miroslav Kusý)和米兰-滨田(Milan Hamada)都是最早探讨人的制度和权力决定及其自由问题的思想家。尽管他们的哲学视角不同,但两人都专注于寻求有关界定个人自由发展条件的问题的答案,并对马克思主义哲学的人文主义诠释产生了兴趣。在这种情况下,Kusý 的思想集中于社会民主化的实际问题,他用 "制度革命 "一词来定义这一问题。与这一观点相反,米兰-滨田的思想受到了权力干预创造个人自由空间问题的启发,他从存在现象学的角度对这一问题进行了诠释。本研究将详细介绍这两位思想家如何思考为自由和人的尊严而斗争的可能解决方案,这种斗争是由同质化政治权力的风险所决定的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Reflexia slobody v myslení Miroslava Kusého a Milana Hamadu
The study examines reflections on freedom in the thinking of two important representatives of the democratizing changes in Czecho-slovakia in the 1960s. Both Miroslav Kusý and Milan Hamada were among the original thinkers who dealt with the issue of the institutional and power determination of man and his freedom. Despite their different philosophical perspectives, both focused on seeking answers to questions about defining the conditions for the development of individual freedom, which was combined with an interest in the humanistic interpretation of Marxist philosophy. In this context, Kusý’s thinking concentrated on the practical problem of social democratization, which he defined using the term “institutional revolution.” In contrast to this perspective, the thinking of Milan Hamada was inspired by an interest in the issue of power interference in the creation of a space of personal freedom, which he interpreted from an existential-phenomenological point of view. The study will detail how both thinkers reflected on possible solutions to the struggle for freedom and human dignity, which is determined by the risk of a homogenising political power.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
In What Sense Can Art Be Ecological? Art as an Event Flash of Nature According to Henri Maldiney Living in Harmony with the Cosmos: A Comparative Study between Confucianism and John Dewey Body, Illness and Symbol in Ernst Cassirer Philosophy of Academic Ethics and the Common Good The Philosophy of Linguistics: Its Theoretical Groundings and Examples in Practice
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1