教学中的依恋表征和情感是高等教育教学风格的前因

Jonathan Mattanah, Laura J. Holt, Richard S. Feinn, Courtney Katzenberg, Elianna Albert, Ryan Boarman, Olivia Bowley, Katherine Marszalek, Thomas Visalli, Damilola Daramola, Mohammed Abduljalil
{"title":"教学中的依恋表征和情感是高等教育教学风格的前因","authors":"Jonathan Mattanah, Laura J. Holt, Richard S. Feinn, Courtney Katzenberg, Elianna Albert, Ryan Boarman, Olivia Bowley, Katherine Marszalek, Thomas Visalli, Damilola Daramola, Mohammed Abduljalil","doi":"10.5430/ijhe.v13n1p1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The current study explored how relational antecedents and emotional experiences were associated with faculty-centered versus student-centered approaches to teaching in higher education. One hundred and forty-one faculty members from two institutions of higher education in the United States completed self-report surveys regarding an undergraduate course they were teaching that semester. Path analyses showed that faculty reports of a secure attachment style were positively correlated with positive teaching-related emotions and, in turn, with greater use of a student-centered, inquiry-based approach to teaching emphasizing engagement with course material and restructuring of students’ knowledge. Faculty reports of avoidant and anxious-ambivalent attachment styles were correlated with greater negative teaching-related emotions and, in turn, with greater use of a faculty-centered, direct instruction teaching approach. These findings suggest that attachment theory is a useful lens through which to understand why faculty might feel more positively or negatively about their teaching and, in turn, the teaching approaches they employ. We discuss how our findings might inform the re-design of faculty training programs to encourage reflection on relationship styles and greater positive emotions about teaching.","PeriodicalId":510213,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Higher Education","volume":" 18","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Attachment Representations and Emotions in Teaching as Antecedents to Teaching Styles in Higher Education\",\"authors\":\"Jonathan Mattanah, Laura J. Holt, Richard S. Feinn, Courtney Katzenberg, Elianna Albert, Ryan Boarman, Olivia Bowley, Katherine Marszalek, Thomas Visalli, Damilola Daramola, Mohammed Abduljalil\",\"doi\":\"10.5430/ijhe.v13n1p1\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The current study explored how relational antecedents and emotional experiences were associated with faculty-centered versus student-centered approaches to teaching in higher education. One hundred and forty-one faculty members from two institutions of higher education in the United States completed self-report surveys regarding an undergraduate course they were teaching that semester. Path analyses showed that faculty reports of a secure attachment style were positively correlated with positive teaching-related emotions and, in turn, with greater use of a student-centered, inquiry-based approach to teaching emphasizing engagement with course material and restructuring of students’ knowledge. Faculty reports of avoidant and anxious-ambivalent attachment styles were correlated with greater negative teaching-related emotions and, in turn, with greater use of a faculty-centered, direct instruction teaching approach. These findings suggest that attachment theory is a useful lens through which to understand why faculty might feel more positively or negatively about their teaching and, in turn, the teaching approaches they employ. We discuss how our findings might inform the re-design of faculty training programs to encourage reflection on relationship styles and greater positive emotions about teaching.\",\"PeriodicalId\":510213,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Higher Education\",\"volume\":\" 18\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Higher Education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5430/ijhe.v13n1p1\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Higher Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5430/ijhe.v13n1p1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究探讨了关系前因和情感体验如何与高等教育中以教师为中心和以学生为中心的教学方法相关联。来自美国两所高等教育机构的 141 名教师就他们在该学期教授的一门本科课程完成了自我报告调查。路径分析显示,教师报告的安全型依恋风格与积极的教学相关情绪呈正相关,反过来,安全型依恋风格也与更多地使用以学生为中心、以探究为基础、强调参与课程材料和重组学生知识的教学方法呈正相关。教师报告的回避型和焦虑矛盾型依恋风格与更多与教学相关的消极情绪相关,进而与更多使用以教师为中心的直接教学法相关。这些研究结果表明,依恋理论是一个有用的视角,通过它我们可以理解为什么教职员工会对自己的教学产生积极或消极的情绪,进而理解他们所采用的教学方法。我们将讨论我们的研究结果如何为重新设计教师培训计划提供信息,以鼓励对关系风格和更积极的教学情绪进行反思。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Attachment Representations and Emotions in Teaching as Antecedents to Teaching Styles in Higher Education
The current study explored how relational antecedents and emotional experiences were associated with faculty-centered versus student-centered approaches to teaching in higher education. One hundred and forty-one faculty members from two institutions of higher education in the United States completed self-report surveys regarding an undergraduate course they were teaching that semester. Path analyses showed that faculty reports of a secure attachment style were positively correlated with positive teaching-related emotions and, in turn, with greater use of a student-centered, inquiry-based approach to teaching emphasizing engagement with course material and restructuring of students’ knowledge. Faculty reports of avoidant and anxious-ambivalent attachment styles were correlated with greater negative teaching-related emotions and, in turn, with greater use of a faculty-centered, direct instruction teaching approach. These findings suggest that attachment theory is a useful lens through which to understand why faculty might feel more positively or negatively about their teaching and, in turn, the teaching approaches they employ. We discuss how our findings might inform the re-design of faculty training programs to encourage reflection on relationship styles and greater positive emotions about teaching.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Impact of Technology in Classrooms in the Colleges of Kathmandu: Challenges and Policy Recommendations Exploring Extra-Curricular Bootcamps: A Qualitative Study on Accelerated Learning in Higher Education Proyecto Slam : The Didactic Side of Slams Reviewer Acknowledgements for International Journal of Higher Education, Vol. 13, No. 2, 2024 Addressing Gender-Based Violence through the ERA Policy Framework: A Systemic Solution to Dilemmas and Contestations for Institutions
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1