应用启发式评估方法评估人事管理信息系统的用户体验和用户界面,以提高员工绩效

Fatkhuri, Donny Dharmawan, Wenny Desty Febrian, Sugeng Karyadi, Indra Sani
{"title":"应用启发式评估方法评估人事管理信息系统的用户体验和用户界面,以提高员工绩效","authors":"Fatkhuri, Donny Dharmawan, Wenny Desty Febrian, Sugeng Karyadi, Indra Sani","doi":"10.60083/jidt.v6i1.466","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This research aims to determine the level of user satisfaction with using SIMPEG application and evaluate the user interface design to improve the user experience. The research was conducted using qualitative methods. Researchers decided to involve as many as 100 participants in this research. To collect data and information based on system requirements, researchers collect data using observation, interviews, questionnaires, and literature studies. In designing the evaluation at application, researchers used a user-centered design approach and the heuristic evaluation method. Based on the research results, it was found that in the UCD approach, it often experiences bugs and errors, whereas in application there is no mobile application available, which aims to make it easier for employees to access the application anywhere and anytime. It is currently only available on a web basis. The UCD approach shows that the application has uses and functions that meet employee expectations with an average percentage of 70%, falling into the attractive category. The end result of the UCD approach emphasizes the importance of clearly understanding users and providing better user experiences. Meanwhile, the HE approaches helps identify problems with the application and focuses attention on usability issues in the HE aspects. In an effort to improve the quality of the user interface (UI) and user experience (UX) in application, the evaluation that has been carried out shows that improvements need to be focused on the appearance and use of the application.","PeriodicalId":507682,"journal":{"name":"Jurnal Informasi dan Teknologi","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Application of Heuristic Evaluation Method to Evaluate User Experience and User Interface of Personnel Management Information Systems to Improve Employee Performance\",\"authors\":\"Fatkhuri, Donny Dharmawan, Wenny Desty Febrian, Sugeng Karyadi, Indra Sani\",\"doi\":\"10.60083/jidt.v6i1.466\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This research aims to determine the level of user satisfaction with using SIMPEG application and evaluate the user interface design to improve the user experience. The research was conducted using qualitative methods. Researchers decided to involve as many as 100 participants in this research. To collect data and information based on system requirements, researchers collect data using observation, interviews, questionnaires, and literature studies. In designing the evaluation at application, researchers used a user-centered design approach and the heuristic evaluation method. Based on the research results, it was found that in the UCD approach, it often experiences bugs and errors, whereas in application there is no mobile application available, which aims to make it easier for employees to access the application anywhere and anytime. It is currently only available on a web basis. The UCD approach shows that the application has uses and functions that meet employee expectations with an average percentage of 70%, falling into the attractive category. The end result of the UCD approach emphasizes the importance of clearly understanding users and providing better user experiences. Meanwhile, the HE approaches helps identify problems with the application and focuses attention on usability issues in the HE aspects. In an effort to improve the quality of the user interface (UI) and user experience (UX) in application, the evaluation that has been carried out shows that improvements need to be focused on the appearance and use of the application.\",\"PeriodicalId\":507682,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Jurnal Informasi dan Teknologi\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Jurnal Informasi dan Teknologi\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.60083/jidt.v6i1.466\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jurnal Informasi dan Teknologi","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.60083/jidt.v6i1.466","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

本研究旨在确定用户对 SIMPEG 应用程序的满意程度,并评估用户界面设计,以改善用户体验。研究采用定性方法进行。研究人员决定让多达 100 名参与者参与本研究。为了收集基于系统需求的数据和信息,研究人员通过观察、访谈、问卷调查和文献研究来收集数据。在设计应用评估时,研究人员采用了以用户为中心的设计方法和启发式评估方法。根据研究结果发现,在用户中心设计方法中,经常出现错误和错误,而在应用程序中,没有提供移动应用程序,其目的是方便员工随时随地访问应用程序。目前只能通过网络使用。统一设计方法表明,应用程序的用途和功能符合员工的期望,平均比例为 70%,属于有吸引力的类别。UCD 方法的最终结果强调了清楚了解用户和提供更好用户体验的重要性。同时,HE 方法有助于发现应用程序中存在的问题,并关注 HE 方面的可用性问题。为了提高应用程序的用户界面(UI)和用户体验(UX)质量,已进行的评估表明,需要重点改进应用程序的外观和使用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Application of Heuristic Evaluation Method to Evaluate User Experience and User Interface of Personnel Management Information Systems to Improve Employee Performance
This research aims to determine the level of user satisfaction with using SIMPEG application and evaluate the user interface design to improve the user experience. The research was conducted using qualitative methods. Researchers decided to involve as many as 100 participants in this research. To collect data and information based on system requirements, researchers collect data using observation, interviews, questionnaires, and literature studies. In designing the evaluation at application, researchers used a user-centered design approach and the heuristic evaluation method. Based on the research results, it was found that in the UCD approach, it often experiences bugs and errors, whereas in application there is no mobile application available, which aims to make it easier for employees to access the application anywhere and anytime. It is currently only available on a web basis. The UCD approach shows that the application has uses and functions that meet employee expectations with an average percentage of 70%, falling into the attractive category. The end result of the UCD approach emphasizes the importance of clearly understanding users and providing better user experiences. Meanwhile, the HE approaches helps identify problems with the application and focuses attention on usability issues in the HE aspects. In an effort to improve the quality of the user interface (UI) and user experience (UX) in application, the evaluation that has been carried out shows that improvements need to be focused on the appearance and use of the application.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Social Media Analysis: Utilizing Information Technology for Market Intelligence and Branding of Toraja Coffe Products Consumer Preferences on Processed Herbs and Spices Products of SMEs in Sukoharjo Managing Human Resource in the Digital Economy: Balancing Challenges and Opportunities The Disabled Community Empowerment Model with Social Entrepreneurship Approach to Tenoon Business Analysis of The Role of Affective Commitment As an Intervening Variable in The Relationship Between Effective Reward and Organizational Learning in Advertising Industry
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1