比较超声波和细针穿刺术在区分甲状腺良性肿块和恶性肿块方面的作用

Ladan Hajiabdolrrasouli, H. Samimagham, S. Hosseini Teshnizi, Ali Salimi Asl, MohammadHosein Sheybani-Arani, Soroush Jaberansari, Mitra Kazemi Jahromi
{"title":"比较超声波和细针穿刺术在区分甲状腺良性肿块和恶性肿块方面的作用","authors":"Ladan Hajiabdolrrasouli, H. Samimagham, S. Hosseini Teshnizi, Ali Salimi Asl, MohammadHosein Sheybani-Arani, Soroush Jaberansari, Mitra Kazemi Jahromi","doi":"10.34172/jpd.2024.11244","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: Due to the possibility of malignancy of thyroid nodules, it is necessary to identify the type of thyroid nodule to choose the most accurate treatment possible. Objectives: Considering that there is no standard diagnostic method for masses with intermediate suspicion of malignancy, the present study was conducted to investigate the diagnostic value of ultrasound in differentiating between benign and malignant thyroid masses compared with fine needle aspiration (FNA). Patients and Methods: In this cross-sectional study, 150 patients who had been referred to an endocrinologist’s office in Bandar Abbas with a complaint of thyroid mass in 2019-2020 and had undergone ultrasound and FNA were included in the study by census. After obtaining their informed consent, the patient’s information was collected by reviewing their ultrasound and FNA reports and analyzed with descriptive and analytical tests in SPSS software version 26. Results: The sensitivity and specificity of ultrasound in detecting malignant and benign masses were 56.25% and 85.07%, respectively. The positive and negative predictive values of ultrasound were 60% and 98.27%, respectively. The number of malignant FNA reports was significantly higher in the intermediate suspicion category of patients than in patients with ultrasound results showing high suspicion of malignancy. Conclusion: Performing further diagnostic measures such as FNA and core needle biopsy after noticing an intermediate suspicion in a patient’s ultrasound seems necessary.","PeriodicalId":16657,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Parathyroid Disease","volume":" 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparing ultrasound to fine needle aspiration in differentiating between benign and malignant thyroid masses\",\"authors\":\"Ladan Hajiabdolrrasouli, H. Samimagham, S. Hosseini Teshnizi, Ali Salimi Asl, MohammadHosein Sheybani-Arani, Soroush Jaberansari, Mitra Kazemi Jahromi\",\"doi\":\"10.34172/jpd.2024.11244\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Introduction: Due to the possibility of malignancy of thyroid nodules, it is necessary to identify the type of thyroid nodule to choose the most accurate treatment possible. Objectives: Considering that there is no standard diagnostic method for masses with intermediate suspicion of malignancy, the present study was conducted to investigate the diagnostic value of ultrasound in differentiating between benign and malignant thyroid masses compared with fine needle aspiration (FNA). Patients and Methods: In this cross-sectional study, 150 patients who had been referred to an endocrinologist’s office in Bandar Abbas with a complaint of thyroid mass in 2019-2020 and had undergone ultrasound and FNA were included in the study by census. After obtaining their informed consent, the patient’s information was collected by reviewing their ultrasound and FNA reports and analyzed with descriptive and analytical tests in SPSS software version 26. Results: The sensitivity and specificity of ultrasound in detecting malignant and benign masses were 56.25% and 85.07%, respectively. The positive and negative predictive values of ultrasound were 60% and 98.27%, respectively. The number of malignant FNA reports was significantly higher in the intermediate suspicion category of patients than in patients with ultrasound results showing high suspicion of malignancy. Conclusion: Performing further diagnostic measures such as FNA and core needle biopsy after noticing an intermediate suspicion in a patient’s ultrasound seems necessary.\",\"PeriodicalId\":16657,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Parathyroid Disease\",\"volume\":\" 4\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Parathyroid Disease\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.34172/jpd.2024.11244\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Parathyroid Disease","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.34172/jpd.2024.11244","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

简介由于甲状腺结节有恶变的可能,因此有必要确定甲状腺结节的类型,以便选择最准确的治疗方法。研究目的考虑到目前尚无针对中度怀疑恶性肿块的标准诊断方法,本研究旨在探讨与细针穿刺术(FNA)相比,超声波在区分甲状腺肿块良性和恶性方面的诊断价值。患者和方法:在这项横断面研究中,通过普查纳入了 150 名在 2019-2020 年期间因甲状腺肿块主诉而被转诊至阿巴斯港内分泌科办公室并接受过超声检查和 FNA 检查的患者。在获得他们的知情同意后,通过查看他们的超声波和 FNA 报告收集患者信息,并在 SPSS 软件 26 版中进行描述性和分析性检验。结果超声波检测恶性和良性肿块的敏感性和特异性分别为 56.25% 和 85.07%。超声波的阳性预测值为 60%,阴性预测值为 98.27%。中度怀疑类别患者的恶性 FNA 报告数量明显高于超声结果显示高度怀疑为恶性的患者。结论在发现患者的超声检查结果为中度怀疑时,似乎有必要采取进一步的诊断措施,如 FNA 和核心针活检。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Comparing ultrasound to fine needle aspiration in differentiating between benign and malignant thyroid masses
Introduction: Due to the possibility of malignancy of thyroid nodules, it is necessary to identify the type of thyroid nodule to choose the most accurate treatment possible. Objectives: Considering that there is no standard diagnostic method for masses with intermediate suspicion of malignancy, the present study was conducted to investigate the diagnostic value of ultrasound in differentiating between benign and malignant thyroid masses compared with fine needle aspiration (FNA). Patients and Methods: In this cross-sectional study, 150 patients who had been referred to an endocrinologist’s office in Bandar Abbas with a complaint of thyroid mass in 2019-2020 and had undergone ultrasound and FNA were included in the study by census. After obtaining their informed consent, the patient’s information was collected by reviewing their ultrasound and FNA reports and analyzed with descriptive and analytical tests in SPSS software version 26. Results: The sensitivity and specificity of ultrasound in detecting malignant and benign masses were 56.25% and 85.07%, respectively. The positive and negative predictive values of ultrasound were 60% and 98.27%, respectively. The number of malignant FNA reports was significantly higher in the intermediate suspicion category of patients than in patients with ultrasound results showing high suspicion of malignancy. Conclusion: Performing further diagnostic measures such as FNA and core needle biopsy after noticing an intermediate suspicion in a patient’s ultrasound seems necessary.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Parathyroid crisis; a short look at an uncommon disease Types of application of artificial intelligence in the diagnosis and prognosis of osteoporosis; a narrative review Recent advancements in the treatment of tertiary hyperparathyroidism Vitamin D status in hemodialysis; current opinions Relationship of calcium-sensing receptor gene polymorphism CASR rs 1042636, CASR rs 1802757, and cinacalcet response among Egyptian hemodialysis patients with secondary hyperparathyroidism
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1