独立性、专业怀疑论与审计质量:审计费用的调节作用

Juliyanti Sidik Tjan, Muslim Muslim, Andriani Alimin, Muh Yamin Noch, Yaya Sonjaya
{"title":"独立性、专业怀疑论与审计质量:审计费用的调节作用","authors":"Juliyanti Sidik Tjan, Muslim Muslim, Andriani Alimin, Muh Yamin Noch, Yaya Sonjaya","doi":"10.24912/ja.v28i1.1698","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This research investigates the impact of auditor independence and professional scepticism on audit quality, focusing on audit fees as a moderating factor in Makassar City's public accounting firms. The study employs census sampling, involving 39 auditors from eight Makassar-based public accounting firms. Hypotheses are tested using multiple linear regression via Smart PLS 3.0 software, complemented by descriptive statistical tests. The research also conducts assessments, including convergent validity, discriminant validity, composite reliability, and inner model evaluations. Results indicate that auditor independence and professional scepticism positively and significantly affect audit quality. As a moderating variable, audit fees also positively and significantly impact audit quality. These findings offer public accounting firms valuable insights, emphasising the need to evaluate and potentially adjust their policies proactively. This proactive approach can help mitigate potential risks linked to declining audit quality.","PeriodicalId":506414,"journal":{"name":"Jurnal Akuntansi","volume":" 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Independence, Professional Skepticism, And Audit Quality: The Moderating Role Of Audit Fees\",\"authors\":\"Juliyanti Sidik Tjan, Muslim Muslim, Andriani Alimin, Muh Yamin Noch, Yaya Sonjaya\",\"doi\":\"10.24912/ja.v28i1.1698\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This research investigates the impact of auditor independence and professional scepticism on audit quality, focusing on audit fees as a moderating factor in Makassar City's public accounting firms. The study employs census sampling, involving 39 auditors from eight Makassar-based public accounting firms. Hypotheses are tested using multiple linear regression via Smart PLS 3.0 software, complemented by descriptive statistical tests. The research also conducts assessments, including convergent validity, discriminant validity, composite reliability, and inner model evaluations. Results indicate that auditor independence and professional scepticism positively and significantly affect audit quality. As a moderating variable, audit fees also positively and significantly impact audit quality. These findings offer public accounting firms valuable insights, emphasising the need to evaluate and potentially adjust their policies proactively. This proactive approach can help mitigate potential risks linked to declining audit quality.\",\"PeriodicalId\":506414,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Jurnal Akuntansi\",\"volume\":\" 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Jurnal Akuntansi\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.24912/ja.v28i1.1698\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jurnal Akuntansi","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24912/ja.v28i1.1698","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究调查了审计师独立性和专业怀疑态度对审计质量的影响,重点是作为调节因素的马卡萨市公共会计师事务所的审计费用。本研究采用普查抽样法,涉及马卡萨市 8 家会计师事务所的 39 名审计师。通过 Smart PLS 3.0 软件进行多元线性回归,并辅以描述性统计测试,对假设进行检验。研究还进行了评估,包括收敛有效性、判别有效性、综合可靠性和内部模型评估。结果表明,审计师的独立性和职业怀疑态度对审计质量有显著的正向影响。作为一个调节变量,审计费用对审计质量也有积极而显著的影响。这些研究结果为公共会计师事务所提供了宝贵的见解,强调了主动评估和潜在调整其政策的必要性。这种积极主动的方法有助于降低与审计质量下降相关的潜在风险。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Independence, Professional Skepticism, And Audit Quality: The Moderating Role Of Audit Fees
This research investigates the impact of auditor independence and professional scepticism on audit quality, focusing on audit fees as a moderating factor in Makassar City's public accounting firms. The study employs census sampling, involving 39 auditors from eight Makassar-based public accounting firms. Hypotheses are tested using multiple linear regression via Smart PLS 3.0 software, complemented by descriptive statistical tests. The research also conducts assessments, including convergent validity, discriminant validity, composite reliability, and inner model evaluations. Results indicate that auditor independence and professional scepticism positively and significantly affect audit quality. As a moderating variable, audit fees also positively and significantly impact audit quality. These findings offer public accounting firms valuable insights, emphasising the need to evaluate and potentially adjust their policies proactively. This proactive approach can help mitigate potential risks linked to declining audit quality.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The Capital Adequacy, Asset Quality, Management Quality, Earning Quality, and Liquidity Analysis in Indonesia Banking Sectors Board of Commissioners Effectiveness, Transparency, Shari'ah Supervisory Board, and Financial Performance of Indonesian Shari'ah Banks Digital Accounting Information System Implementation at BPKAD SAMOSIR District Corporate in Financial Distress and Determinant Analysis of Successful Financial Turnaround BEBERAPA FAKTOR YANG MEMPENGARUHI KEBIJAKAN UTANG
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1