拉伸对肌肉力量、耐力和力量表现的影响:系统回顾和荟萃分析

IF 0.6 4区 医学 Q4 ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL Isokinetics and Exercise Science Pub Date : 2024-01-08 DOI:10.3233/ies-220120
Alex Lopes Dos Reis, Laís Campos de Oliveira, Amanda Yasmin Vieira de Souza, Antonio Stabelini Neto, Raphael Gonçalves de Oliveira
{"title":"拉伸对肌肉力量、耐力和力量表现的影响:系统回顾和荟萃分析","authors":"Alex Lopes Dos Reis, Laís Campos de Oliveira, Amanda Yasmin Vieira de Souza, Antonio Stabelini Neto, Raphael Gonçalves de Oliveira","doi":"10.3233/ies-220120","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"BACKGROUND: The acute and chronic effects of stretching preceding exercises on strength, power and muscular endurance are still not entirely clear in the literature. OBJECTIVE: To verify the acute and chronic effects of the main types of stretching (static, dynamic, PNF, and ballistic) on muscle strength, power, and endurance. METHODS: A systematic literature search was performed in: PubMed, Web of Science, LILACS, Scopus, Science Direct, and CENTRAL. The methodological quality was assessed using the PEDro scale. Meta-analysis were performed using the standardized mean difference (SMD). RESULTS: 43 studies were included in the systematic review and 30 in the meta-analysis calculations. Only two studies showed high methodological quality. In general, static stretching had an impact on the potentiated the gain in muscle strength of the lower limbs in the long term (0.60 [0.20–1.00]). The acute (ES = 0.38 [0.05–0.70]) and long-term (ES = 1.04 [0.21–1.88]) dynamic stretching was able to potentiate the gain of muscle power in the lower limbs, while the acute PNF had an impact on the worsening of the muscular endurance (ES = 1.68 [0.83–2.53]). CONCLUSIONS: When the training objective is linked to acute effects, dynamic stretching should be prioritized before the main activity. For long-term effects, static and dynamic stretching have been shown to potentiate muscle strength and power gain, respectively, and are recommended in these cases.","PeriodicalId":54915,"journal":{"name":"Isokinetics and Exercise Science","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effects of stretching on muscle strength, endurance, and power performance: A systematic review and meta-analysis\",\"authors\":\"Alex Lopes Dos Reis, Laís Campos de Oliveira, Amanda Yasmin Vieira de Souza, Antonio Stabelini Neto, Raphael Gonçalves de Oliveira\",\"doi\":\"10.3233/ies-220120\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"BACKGROUND: The acute and chronic effects of stretching preceding exercises on strength, power and muscular endurance are still not entirely clear in the literature. OBJECTIVE: To verify the acute and chronic effects of the main types of stretching (static, dynamic, PNF, and ballistic) on muscle strength, power, and endurance. METHODS: A systematic literature search was performed in: PubMed, Web of Science, LILACS, Scopus, Science Direct, and CENTRAL. The methodological quality was assessed using the PEDro scale. Meta-analysis were performed using the standardized mean difference (SMD). RESULTS: 43 studies were included in the systematic review and 30 in the meta-analysis calculations. Only two studies showed high methodological quality. In general, static stretching had an impact on the potentiated the gain in muscle strength of the lower limbs in the long term (0.60 [0.20–1.00]). The acute (ES = 0.38 [0.05–0.70]) and long-term (ES = 1.04 [0.21–1.88]) dynamic stretching was able to potentiate the gain of muscle power in the lower limbs, while the acute PNF had an impact on the worsening of the muscular endurance (ES = 1.68 [0.83–2.53]). CONCLUSIONS: When the training objective is linked to acute effects, dynamic stretching should be prioritized before the main activity. For long-term effects, static and dynamic stretching have been shown to potentiate muscle strength and power gain, respectively, and are recommended in these cases.\",\"PeriodicalId\":54915,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Isokinetics and Exercise Science\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Isokinetics and Exercise Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3233/ies-220120\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Isokinetics and Exercise Science","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3233/ies-220120","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:文献中仍未完全明确练习前拉伸对力量、功率和肌肉耐力的急性和慢性影响。目的:验证主要拉伸类型(静态、动态、PNF 和弹道)对肌力、力量和耐力的急性和慢性影响。方法:在以下网站进行了系统的文献检索:PubMed、Web of Science、LILACS、Scopus、Science Direct 和 CENTRAL。方法学质量采用 PEDro 量表进行评估。使用标准化平均差(SMD)进行元分析。结果:43 项研究被纳入系统综述,30 项研究被纳入荟萃分析计算。只有两项研究的方法质量较高。总的来说,静态拉伸对长期增强下肢肌肉力量有影响(0.60 [0.20-1.00])。急性(ES = 0.38 [0.05-0.70])和长期(ES = 1.04 [0.21-1.88])动态拉伸能够增强下肢肌肉力量的增长,而急性 PNF 对肌肉耐力的恶化有影响(ES = 1.68 [0.83-2.53])。结论:当训练目标与急性效果相关时,动态拉伸应优先于主要活动。就长期效果而言,静态拉伸和动态拉伸已被证明可分别促进肌肉力量和力量的增长,因此建议在这些情况下进行动态拉伸。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Effects of stretching on muscle strength, endurance, and power performance: A systematic review and meta-analysis
BACKGROUND: The acute and chronic effects of stretching preceding exercises on strength, power and muscular endurance are still not entirely clear in the literature. OBJECTIVE: To verify the acute and chronic effects of the main types of stretching (static, dynamic, PNF, and ballistic) on muscle strength, power, and endurance. METHODS: A systematic literature search was performed in: PubMed, Web of Science, LILACS, Scopus, Science Direct, and CENTRAL. The methodological quality was assessed using the PEDro scale. Meta-analysis were performed using the standardized mean difference (SMD). RESULTS: 43 studies were included in the systematic review and 30 in the meta-analysis calculations. Only two studies showed high methodological quality. In general, static stretching had an impact on the potentiated the gain in muscle strength of the lower limbs in the long term (0.60 [0.20–1.00]). The acute (ES = 0.38 [0.05–0.70]) and long-term (ES = 1.04 [0.21–1.88]) dynamic stretching was able to potentiate the gain of muscle power in the lower limbs, while the acute PNF had an impact on the worsening of the muscular endurance (ES = 1.68 [0.83–2.53]). CONCLUSIONS: When the training objective is linked to acute effects, dynamic stretching should be prioritized before the main activity. For long-term effects, static and dynamic stretching have been shown to potentiate muscle strength and power gain, respectively, and are recommended in these cases.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Isokinetics and Exercise Science
Isokinetics and Exercise Science 医学-工程:生物医学
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
14.30%
发文量
37
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Isokinetics and Exercise Science (IES) is an international journal devoted to the study of theoretical and applied aspects of human muscle performance. Since isokinetic dynamometry constitutes the major tool in this area, the journal takes a particular interest in exploring the considerable potential of this technology. IES publishes studies associated with the methodology of muscle performance especially with respect to the issues of reproducibility and validity of testing, description of normal and pathological mechanical parameters which are derivable from muscle testing, applications in basic research topics such as motor learning paradigms and electromyography. The journal also publishes studies on applications in clinical settings and technical aspects of the various measurement systems employed in human muscle performance research. The journal welcomes submissions in the form of research papers, reviews, case studies and technical reports from professionals in the fields of sports medicine, orthopaedic and neurological rehabilitation and exercise physiology.
期刊最新文献
The relationship between asymmetry changes in the slope frequency of bioelectrical activity of the gluteus maximus muscles and experience in short track speed skating athletics The effect of fatigue on strength-power tests for distinguishing elite-level male kickboxers The effects of different velocity loss training protocols after 3 weeks of resistance training on muscular strength and power Optimizing warm-up efficiency: Impact of repetitions in straight leg raises on hip and knee flexibility in individuals with and without hamstring tightness The useful lean tissue and appendicular skeletal muscle mass indices related to physical performance in patients undergoing hemodialysis
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1