基于自然的城市环境固碳解决方案

IF 6.7 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES Current Opinion in Environmental Science and Health Pub Date : 2024-02-01 DOI:10.1016/j.coesh.2024.100536
Paulo Pereira , Fang Wang , Miguel Inacio , Marius Kalinauskas , Katažyna Bogdzevič , Igor Bogunovic , Wenwu Zhao , Damia Barcelo
{"title":"基于自然的城市环境固碳解决方案","authors":"Paulo Pereira ,&nbsp;Fang Wang ,&nbsp;Miguel Inacio ,&nbsp;Marius Kalinauskas ,&nbsp;Katažyna Bogdzevič ,&nbsp;Igor Bogunovic ,&nbsp;Wenwu Zhao ,&nbsp;Damia Barcelo","doi":"10.1016/j.coesh.2024.100536","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Cities are among the areas that emit more carbon to the atmosphere and contribute to climate change. It is urgent to mitigate their impact. Nature-based solutions (NBS), terrestrial and water-based, are an excellent option to reverse this trend. Nevertheless, their effectiveness depends on the natural areas where they are established, the type, and the management practices applied. Also, when subjected to an intense human impact, NBS are in poor condition, and their effectiveness in storing carbon is reduced. Overall, terrestrial-based NBS can be an important carbon sink. On the other hand, water-based NBS carbon storage can be more limited and emit other greenhouse gases (e.g., methane and nitrous oxide). NBS must be designed according to the proposed objective and respect the local conditions. This will help improve their effectiveness in carbon sequestration or other purposes.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":52296,"journal":{"name":"Current Opinion in Environmental Science and Health","volume":"37 ","pages":"Article 100536"},"PeriodicalIF":6.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2468584424000060/pdfft?md5=71ef06501c6baa6cdd1c1df56c3d0748&pid=1-s2.0-S2468584424000060-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Nature-based solutions for carbon sequestration in urban environments\",\"authors\":\"Paulo Pereira ,&nbsp;Fang Wang ,&nbsp;Miguel Inacio ,&nbsp;Marius Kalinauskas ,&nbsp;Katažyna Bogdzevič ,&nbsp;Igor Bogunovic ,&nbsp;Wenwu Zhao ,&nbsp;Damia Barcelo\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.coesh.2024.100536\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Cities are among the areas that emit more carbon to the atmosphere and contribute to climate change. It is urgent to mitigate their impact. Nature-based solutions (NBS), terrestrial and water-based, are an excellent option to reverse this trend. Nevertheless, their effectiveness depends on the natural areas where they are established, the type, and the management practices applied. Also, when subjected to an intense human impact, NBS are in poor condition, and their effectiveness in storing carbon is reduced. Overall, terrestrial-based NBS can be an important carbon sink. On the other hand, water-based NBS carbon storage can be more limited and emit other greenhouse gases (e.g., methane and nitrous oxide). NBS must be designed according to the proposed objective and respect the local conditions. This will help improve their effectiveness in carbon sequestration or other purposes.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":52296,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Current Opinion in Environmental Science and Health\",\"volume\":\"37 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100536\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2468584424000060/pdfft?md5=71ef06501c6baa6cdd1c1df56c3d0748&pid=1-s2.0-S2468584424000060-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Current Opinion in Environmental Science and Health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2468584424000060\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Opinion in Environmental Science and Health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2468584424000060","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

城市是向大气排放更多碳并导致气候变化的地区之一。当务之急是减轻它们的影响。以陆地和水为基础的自然解决方案(NBS)是扭转这一趋势的绝佳选择。然而,它们的有效性取决于所建立的自然区域、类型以及所采用的管理方法。此外,当受到强烈的人为影响时,氮封存系统的状况会很差,其碳封存效果也会降低。总体而言,陆基核生物资源可以成为重要的碳汇。另一方面,水基 NBS 的碳储存可能较为有限,并且会排放其他温室气体(如甲烷和一氧化二氮)。必须根据拟议目标设计 NBS,并尊重当地条件。这将有助于提高其固碳或其他用途的有效性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Nature-based solutions for carbon sequestration in urban environments

Cities are among the areas that emit more carbon to the atmosphere and contribute to climate change. It is urgent to mitigate their impact. Nature-based solutions (NBS), terrestrial and water-based, are an excellent option to reverse this trend. Nevertheless, their effectiveness depends on the natural areas where they are established, the type, and the management practices applied. Also, when subjected to an intense human impact, NBS are in poor condition, and their effectiveness in storing carbon is reduced. Overall, terrestrial-based NBS can be an important carbon sink. On the other hand, water-based NBS carbon storage can be more limited and emit other greenhouse gases (e.g., methane and nitrous oxide). NBS must be designed according to the proposed objective and respect the local conditions. This will help improve their effectiveness in carbon sequestration or other purposes.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Current Opinion in Environmental Science and Health
Current Opinion in Environmental Science and Health Medicine-Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
CiteScore
14.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
92
审稿时长
114 days
期刊最新文献
Non-target ants and bioinsecticides: A short review Health risk assessment of groundwater contamination in the Union Territory of Jammu and Kashmir, northern India Impact of topographic and hydrological parameters on urban health in Jaipur City Bioinsecticide synergy: The good, the bad and the unknown Editorial Board
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1