{"title":"简化经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的当日出院手续:单中心经验","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.rccl.2023.12.004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction and objectives</h3><p>Same-day discharge (SDD) can be considered for patients who traditionally required overnight stay (ONS) after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). The authors aimed to evaluate viability of SDD-PCI.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Retrospective single-center observational study of patients who underwent elective PCI. SDD patients were selected based on clinical, angiographic, and sociodemographic characteristics. Patient and procedure characteristics were collected from local databases, and SDD-PCI adverse events (all-cause mortality, acute coronary syndrome, stent thrombosis, reintervention, major bleeding, stroke, contrast-induced renal failure, vascular access complications) at 30-days were analyzed.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>This study included 147 patients, 76% males with a mean age of 66<!--> <!-->±<!--> <!-->10, that underwent elective PCI during the first year after implementation of SDD protocol. Most patients undergoing elective PCI were discharged the same day (<em>n</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->94, 64%). ONS group, when compared to SDD, had higher rates of acute coronary syndrome (38% vs 19%, <em>P</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->.01) and left ventricular dysfunction (17% vs 6%, <em>P</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->.04), higher Syntax I score (10 points [6–16] vs 8 points [5–12]; <em>P</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->.01), more cases of multivessel PCI (24% vs 6%, <em>P</em> <!--><<!--> <!-->.01) and a surrogate for longer procedures – fluoroscopy time (11<!--> <!-->min [7–15] vs 8<!--> <!-->min [5–13]; <em>P</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->.02). There were no adverse events during the 30-day follow-up period of the patients treated in ambulatory regimen.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>SDD-PCI is a safe procedure. Protocol implementation is key to guide interventional cardiologists in low-risk patient selection. The potential role in decreasing bed-shortage, hospital overcrowding, and healthcare costs is pivotal.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":36870,"journal":{"name":"REC: CardioClinics","volume":"59 3","pages":"Pages 184-190"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Streamlining same-day discharge for percutaneous coronary intervention: a single-center experience\",\"authors\":\"\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.rccl.2023.12.004\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Introduction and objectives</h3><p>Same-day discharge (SDD) can be considered for patients who traditionally required overnight stay (ONS) after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). The authors aimed to evaluate viability of SDD-PCI.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Retrospective single-center observational study of patients who underwent elective PCI. SDD patients were selected based on clinical, angiographic, and sociodemographic characteristics. Patient and procedure characteristics were collected from local databases, and SDD-PCI adverse events (all-cause mortality, acute coronary syndrome, stent thrombosis, reintervention, major bleeding, stroke, contrast-induced renal failure, vascular access complications) at 30-days were analyzed.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>This study included 147 patients, 76% males with a mean age of 66<!--> <!-->±<!--> <!-->10, that underwent elective PCI during the first year after implementation of SDD protocol. Most patients undergoing elective PCI were discharged the same day (<em>n</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->94, 64%). ONS group, when compared to SDD, had higher rates of acute coronary syndrome (38% vs 19%, <em>P</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->.01) and left ventricular dysfunction (17% vs 6%, <em>P</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->.04), higher Syntax I score (10 points [6–16] vs 8 points [5–12]; <em>P</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->.01), more cases of multivessel PCI (24% vs 6%, <em>P</em> <!--><<!--> <!-->.01) and a surrogate for longer procedures – fluoroscopy time (11<!--> <!-->min [7–15] vs 8<!--> <!-->min [5–13]; <em>P</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->.02). There were no adverse events during the 30-day follow-up period of the patients treated in ambulatory regimen.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>SDD-PCI is a safe procedure. Protocol implementation is key to guide interventional cardiologists in low-risk patient selection. The potential role in decreasing bed-shortage, hospital overcrowding, and healthcare costs is pivotal.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":36870,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"REC: CardioClinics\",\"volume\":\"59 3\",\"pages\":\"Pages 184-190\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"REC: CardioClinics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2605153223003448\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"REC: CardioClinics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2605153223003448","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
导言和目的对于经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)后传统上需要过夜住院(ONS)的患者,可以考虑当天出院(SDD)。作者旨在评估 SDD-PCI 的可行性。方法对接受择期 PCI 的患者进行回顾性单中心观察研究。根据临床、血管造影和社会人口学特征筛选出 SDD 患者。结果该研究纳入了在 SDD 方案实施后第一年接受择期 PCI 的 147 名患者,其中 76% 为男性,平均年龄为 66±10 岁。大多数接受择期 PCI 的患者当天出院(94 人,64%)。与 SDD 相比,ONS 组急性冠脉综合征(38% vs 19%,P = .01)和左室功能障碍(17% vs 6%,P = .04)发生率更高,Syntax I 评分更高(10 分 [6-16] vs 8 分 [5-12];P = .01)、更多的多血管 PCI 病例(24% vs 6%,P = .01)以及更长手术时间的代名词--透视时间(11 分钟 [7-15] vs 8 分钟 [5-13];P = .02)。采用非卧床方案治疗的患者在 30 天的随访期间没有发生不良事件。实施方案是指导介入心脏病专家选择低风险患者的关键。它在减少病床短缺、医院拥挤和医疗成本方面的潜在作用举足轻重。
Streamlining same-day discharge for percutaneous coronary intervention: a single-center experience
Introduction and objectives
Same-day discharge (SDD) can be considered for patients who traditionally required overnight stay (ONS) after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). The authors aimed to evaluate viability of SDD-PCI.
Methods
Retrospective single-center observational study of patients who underwent elective PCI. SDD patients were selected based on clinical, angiographic, and sociodemographic characteristics. Patient and procedure characteristics were collected from local databases, and SDD-PCI adverse events (all-cause mortality, acute coronary syndrome, stent thrombosis, reintervention, major bleeding, stroke, contrast-induced renal failure, vascular access complications) at 30-days were analyzed.
Results
This study included 147 patients, 76% males with a mean age of 66 ± 10, that underwent elective PCI during the first year after implementation of SDD protocol. Most patients undergoing elective PCI were discharged the same day (n = 94, 64%). ONS group, when compared to SDD, had higher rates of acute coronary syndrome (38% vs 19%, P = .01) and left ventricular dysfunction (17% vs 6%, P = .04), higher Syntax I score (10 points [6–16] vs 8 points [5–12]; P = .01), more cases of multivessel PCI (24% vs 6%, P < .01) and a surrogate for longer procedures – fluoroscopy time (11 min [7–15] vs 8 min [5–13]; P = .02). There were no adverse events during the 30-day follow-up period of the patients treated in ambulatory regimen.
Conclusions
SDD-PCI is a safe procedure. Protocol implementation is key to guide interventional cardiologists in low-risk patient selection. The potential role in decreasing bed-shortage, hospital overcrowding, and healthcare costs is pivotal.