利用基于模糊环境的多标准决策方法对钻井作业活动进行风险排序

IF 0.9 4区 工程技术 Q3 ENGINEERING, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Journal of Engineering Research Pub Date : 2024-03-01 DOI:10.1016/j.jer.2024.01.011
Syed Imran Ali , Shaine Mohammadali Lalji , Syed Muhammad Ali , Yassar Kamal Zia , Nusrat Husain , Nimra Yousaf , Awatef Salem Balobaid , Ashraf Yahya , Zahoor Awan
{"title":"利用基于模糊环境的多标准决策方法对钻井作业活动进行风险排序","authors":"Syed Imran Ali ,&nbsp;Shaine Mohammadali Lalji ,&nbsp;Syed Muhammad Ali ,&nbsp;Yassar Kamal Zia ,&nbsp;Nusrat Husain ,&nbsp;Nimra Yousaf ,&nbsp;Awatef Salem Balobaid ,&nbsp;Ashraf Yahya ,&nbsp;Zahoor Awan","doi":"10.1016/j.jer.2024.01.011","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The main aim of this research study is to determine the risk ranking of 29 failure modes of rig-up operations using a well-known and highly effective MCDM method i.e. Fuzzy Technique for Order of Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution (FTOPSIS). This method takes into account the four criteria which comprise human impact, property damage, environmental effect and company reputation as risk criteria. Three Experts in the field were invited to present the risk ranking of the relative importance of criteria and criteria performance of each risk (as failure mode) by utilizing linguistic variables which are then integrated in triangular fuzzy numbers for further analysis using the Fuzzy TOPSIS method. The evaluation concluded that FM20 (Collision between the offshore platform and boats) is the most dangerous risk with a coefficient of closeness (CCi) equal to 0.992 while the risk level of FM26 (foggy weather) was found least having a coefficient of closeness (CCi) of 0. Subsequently, sensitivity analysis of ranks concluded that FM1 (H2S inaccurate monitoring) is the most sensitive alternative with standard deviation and frequency of rank change was 5.16 and 15 respectively whereas FM20 (Collision between offshore platform and boats) is observed to be the least sensitive alternative. Fuzzy TOPSIS results were found in excellent correlations with the other reliable MCDM methods which include Fuzzy VIKOR (VIseKriterijumska Optimizacija I Kompromisno Resenje) and Fuzzy COPRAS (COmplex PRoportional ASsessment) yielding correlation of around 1. This study proves to be a landmark in the petroleum industry and significantly contributes to verifying safe practices, by taking appropriate actions in minimizing the risk level associated with different activities during rig-up operations.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48803,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Engineering Research","volume":"12 1","pages":"Pages 289-298"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2307187724000117/pdfft?md5=143e805aec8b9397fbd58f86e63159b0&pid=1-s2.0-S2307187724000117-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Risk ranking of rig up operation activities using multi-criteria decision-making methods based on fuzzy environment\",\"authors\":\"Syed Imran Ali ,&nbsp;Shaine Mohammadali Lalji ,&nbsp;Syed Muhammad Ali ,&nbsp;Yassar Kamal Zia ,&nbsp;Nusrat Husain ,&nbsp;Nimra Yousaf ,&nbsp;Awatef Salem Balobaid ,&nbsp;Ashraf Yahya ,&nbsp;Zahoor Awan\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jer.2024.01.011\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>The main aim of this research study is to determine the risk ranking of 29 failure modes of rig-up operations using a well-known and highly effective MCDM method i.e. Fuzzy Technique for Order of Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution (FTOPSIS). This method takes into account the four criteria which comprise human impact, property damage, environmental effect and company reputation as risk criteria. Three Experts in the field were invited to present the risk ranking of the relative importance of criteria and criteria performance of each risk (as failure mode) by utilizing linguistic variables which are then integrated in triangular fuzzy numbers for further analysis using the Fuzzy TOPSIS method. The evaluation concluded that FM20 (Collision between the offshore platform and boats) is the most dangerous risk with a coefficient of closeness (CCi) equal to 0.992 while the risk level of FM26 (foggy weather) was found least having a coefficient of closeness (CCi) of 0. Subsequently, sensitivity analysis of ranks concluded that FM1 (H2S inaccurate monitoring) is the most sensitive alternative with standard deviation and frequency of rank change was 5.16 and 15 respectively whereas FM20 (Collision between offshore platform and boats) is observed to be the least sensitive alternative. Fuzzy TOPSIS results were found in excellent correlations with the other reliable MCDM methods which include Fuzzy VIKOR (VIseKriterijumska Optimizacija I Kompromisno Resenje) and Fuzzy COPRAS (COmplex PRoportional ASsessment) yielding correlation of around 1. This study proves to be a landmark in the petroleum industry and significantly contributes to verifying safe practices, by taking appropriate actions in minimizing the risk level associated with different activities during rig-up operations.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48803,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Engineering Research\",\"volume\":\"12 1\",\"pages\":\"Pages 289-298\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2307187724000117/pdfft?md5=143e805aec8b9397fbd58f86e63159b0&pid=1-s2.0-S2307187724000117-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Engineering Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2307187724000117\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Engineering Research","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2307187724000117","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究的主要目的是利用一种著名且高效的 MCDM 方法,即 "与理想解相似度排序模糊技术(FTOPSIS)",确定 29 种钻机安装操作故障模式的风险排序。该方法考虑到了四个标准,即作为风险标准的人员影响、财产损失、环境影响和公司声誉。我们邀请了该领域的三位专家,利用语言变量对标准的相对重要性和每种风险(作为失效模式)的标准性能进行风险排序,然后将这些变量整合为三角模糊数,利用模糊 TOPSIS 方法进行进一步分析。评估得出的结论是,FM20(海上平台与船只之间的碰撞)是最危险的风险,其接近系数(CCi)等于 0.992,而 FM26(大雾天气)的风险水平最低,其接近系数(CCi)为 0。随后,等级敏感性分析得出结论,FM1(H2S 不准确监测)是最敏感的备选方案,其等级变化的标准偏差和频率分别为 5.16 和 15,而 FM20(海上平台与船只之间的碰撞)则是最不敏感的备选方案。模糊 TOPSIS 的结果与其他可靠的 MCDM 方法(包括模糊 VIKOR(VonseKriterijumska Optimizacija I Kompromisno Resenje)和模糊 COPRAS(COmplex PRoportional ASsessment))具有极好的相关性,相关性约为 1。 这项研究被证明是石油行业的一个里程碑,通过采取适当行动,最大限度地降低钻井平台作业期间与不同活动相关的风险水平,为验证安全实践做出了重大贡献。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Risk ranking of rig up operation activities using multi-criteria decision-making methods based on fuzzy environment

The main aim of this research study is to determine the risk ranking of 29 failure modes of rig-up operations using a well-known and highly effective MCDM method i.e. Fuzzy Technique for Order of Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution (FTOPSIS). This method takes into account the four criteria which comprise human impact, property damage, environmental effect and company reputation as risk criteria. Three Experts in the field were invited to present the risk ranking of the relative importance of criteria and criteria performance of each risk (as failure mode) by utilizing linguistic variables which are then integrated in triangular fuzzy numbers for further analysis using the Fuzzy TOPSIS method. The evaluation concluded that FM20 (Collision between the offshore platform and boats) is the most dangerous risk with a coefficient of closeness (CCi) equal to 0.992 while the risk level of FM26 (foggy weather) was found least having a coefficient of closeness (CCi) of 0. Subsequently, sensitivity analysis of ranks concluded that FM1 (H2S inaccurate monitoring) is the most sensitive alternative with standard deviation and frequency of rank change was 5.16 and 15 respectively whereas FM20 (Collision between offshore platform and boats) is observed to be the least sensitive alternative. Fuzzy TOPSIS results were found in excellent correlations with the other reliable MCDM methods which include Fuzzy VIKOR (VIseKriterijumska Optimizacija I Kompromisno Resenje) and Fuzzy COPRAS (COmplex PRoportional ASsessment) yielding correlation of around 1. This study proves to be a landmark in the petroleum industry and significantly contributes to verifying safe practices, by taking appropriate actions in minimizing the risk level associated with different activities during rig-up operations.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Engineering Research
Journal of Engineering Research ENGINEERING, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
10.00%
发文量
181
审稿时长
20 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Engineering Research (JER) is a international, peer reviewed journal which publishes full length original research papers, reviews, case studies related to all areas of Engineering such as: Civil, Mechanical, Industrial, Electrical, Computer, Chemical, Petroleum, Aerospace, Architectural, Biomedical, Coastal, Environmental, Marine & Ocean, Metallurgical & Materials, software, Surveying, Systems and Manufacturing Engineering. In particular, JER focuses on innovative approaches and methods that contribute to solving the environmental and manufacturing problems, which exist primarily in the Arabian Gulf region and the Middle East countries. Kuwait University used to publish the Journal "Kuwait Journal of Science and Engineering" (ISSN: 1024-8684), which included Science and Engineering articles since 1974. In 2011 the decision was taken to split KJSE into two independent Journals - "Journal of Engineering Research "(JER) and "Kuwait Journal of Science" (KJS).
期刊最新文献
Improvement of energy saving and indoor air quality by using a spot mixing ventilation (SMV) system in a classroom Efficacy of geopolymerization for integrated bagasse ash and quarry dust in comparison to fly ash as an admixture: A comparative study Direct flame test performance of boards containing waste undersized pumice materials Bearing performance of diaphragm wall pile combination foundation under vertical and horizontal loads Predicting academic performance of learners with the three domains of learning data using neuro-fuzzy model and machine learning algorithms
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1