怀疑关于拼搏和社交

Doris Sommer
{"title":"怀疑关于拼搏和社交","authors":"Doris Sommer","doi":"10.1353/tae.2024.a917792","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract: \"What good are the humanities?\" To practical people who ask this question, my answer will sound paradoxical: The humanities are good for training a taste for doubt. All research starts with doubt, but mostly to resolve it. Humanists don't care as much about answers as about the activity of thinking. They let doubt linger and invite interpretation, conversation, reflection, human contact. The humanities promote sociability and support democracy. If people don't enjoy talking together, hearing various opinions, and sparring sometimes for the sheer fun of it, democracy declines. When rationality and AI eliminate doubt, we become indifferent to differences of perspective, experience, and to each other.","PeriodicalId":176857,"journal":{"name":"Theory & Event","volume":"94 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Doubt: On Sparring and Sociability\",\"authors\":\"Doris Sommer\",\"doi\":\"10.1353/tae.2024.a917792\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract: \\\"What good are the humanities?\\\" To practical people who ask this question, my answer will sound paradoxical: The humanities are good for training a taste for doubt. All research starts with doubt, but mostly to resolve it. Humanists don't care as much about answers as about the activity of thinking. They let doubt linger and invite interpretation, conversation, reflection, human contact. The humanities promote sociability and support democracy. If people don't enjoy talking together, hearing various opinions, and sparring sometimes for the sheer fun of it, democracy declines. When rationality and AI eliminate doubt, we become indifferent to differences of perspective, experience, and to each other.\",\"PeriodicalId\":176857,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Theory & Event\",\"volume\":\"94 4\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Theory & Event\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1353/tae.2024.a917792\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Theory & Event","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/tae.2024.a917792","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要:"人文学科有什么用?对于提出这个问题的实际工作者来说,我的回答听起来有些自相矛盾:人文学科有益于培养怀疑的品位。所有研究都始于怀疑,但大多是为了解决怀疑。人文学者并不关心答案,而是关心思考的活动。他们让疑问萦绕心头,并邀请人们进行解释、对话、反思和人际交往。人文学科促进社交,支持民主。如果人们不喜欢在一起交谈,不喜欢听取各种意见,不喜欢有时为了纯粹的乐趣而争论不休,民主就会衰落。当理性和人工智能消除了疑虑,我们就会对观点、经验和彼此间的差异漠不关心。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Doubt: On Sparring and Sociability
Abstract: "What good are the humanities?" To practical people who ask this question, my answer will sound paradoxical: The humanities are good for training a taste for doubt. All research starts with doubt, but mostly to resolve it. Humanists don't care as much about answers as about the activity of thinking. They let doubt linger and invite interpretation, conversation, reflection, human contact. The humanities promote sociability and support democracy. If people don't enjoy talking together, hearing various opinions, and sparring sometimes for the sheer fun of it, democracy declines. When rationality and AI eliminate doubt, we become indifferent to differences of perspective, experience, and to each other.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Rethinking Fascism, Past and Present: A Review of Clara Mattei's The Capital Order and Alberto Toscano's Late Fascism Facing the Systemic Crisis: The Divide in Criticism of the Pandemic State of Emergency Who Cares for Care Workers? Review of Premilla Nadasen's Care: The Highest Stage of Capitalism Stripping Away the Masks of Identity: Adorno and Fanon's Negative Dialectics Tocqueville on the Abolition of Slavery in the French Caribbean: The Preemptive Dispossession and Proletarianization of Black Workers
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1