阴茎勒死:切除术后随访分析、后遗症和文献综述。

IF 2.1 4区 医学 Q3 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH American Journal of Men's Health Pub Date : 2024-01-01 DOI:10.1177/15579883231223366
Kevin J Campbell, Elizabeth P Kwenda, Shahab Bozorgmehri, Russell S Terry, Lawrence L Yeung
{"title":"阴茎勒死:切除术后随访分析、后遗症和文献综述。","authors":"Kevin J Campbell, Elizabeth P Kwenda, Shahab Bozorgmehri, Russell S Terry, Lawrence L Yeung","doi":"10.1177/15579883231223366","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Numerous case reports exist on penile strangulation injuries and extrication methods; however, the care and long-term consequences of penile strangulation injuries have been under-reported. Our aim is to investigate the long-term outcomes and sequalae following penile strangulation injuries. The PubMed Medline database was searched using the keyword string \"penile strangulation,\" \"penis strangulation,\" and \"constriction\" for all studies reporting outcomes of published penile strangulation injuries. Articles were evaluated for follow-up after strangulation injury, strangulating agent, extricating agent, and sequelae of injury. Fifty-six studies resulted with reports of 100 cases of penile strangulation and extrication from January 2000 to December 2019. The mean patient age was 41 (range: 3-86) years. Twenty-four (24/100) cases reported sequalae following extrication. Follow-up ranged from 2 weeks to 7 years with median follow-up time in the 7- to 12-month grouping. Metal rings comprised 36% (36/100) of strangulation agents and 50% of reported incidents were attributed to sexual activity. To our knowledge, this is the only study focusing on long-term outcomes after penile strangulation. This review provides a summary of 56 studies that document penile strangulation injuries over the last 20 years. Although a wide array of penile strangulation injuries have been documented in the literature, reports lack secondary management and long-term outcomes after removal of the strangulation device. We recommend that providers report long-term penile strangulation outcomes for future urologic evaluations after extrication.</p>","PeriodicalId":7429,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Men's Health","volume":"18 1","pages":"15579883231223366"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10832435/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Penile Strangulation: Analysis of Postextrication Follow-Up, Sequelae, and a Review of Literature.\",\"authors\":\"Kevin J Campbell, Elizabeth P Kwenda, Shahab Bozorgmehri, Russell S Terry, Lawrence L Yeung\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/15579883231223366\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Numerous case reports exist on penile strangulation injuries and extrication methods; however, the care and long-term consequences of penile strangulation injuries have been under-reported. Our aim is to investigate the long-term outcomes and sequalae following penile strangulation injuries. The PubMed Medline database was searched using the keyword string \\\"penile strangulation,\\\" \\\"penis strangulation,\\\" and \\\"constriction\\\" for all studies reporting outcomes of published penile strangulation injuries. Articles were evaluated for follow-up after strangulation injury, strangulating agent, extricating agent, and sequelae of injury. Fifty-six studies resulted with reports of 100 cases of penile strangulation and extrication from January 2000 to December 2019. The mean patient age was 41 (range: 3-86) years. Twenty-four (24/100) cases reported sequalae following extrication. Follow-up ranged from 2 weeks to 7 years with median follow-up time in the 7- to 12-month grouping. Metal rings comprised 36% (36/100) of strangulation agents and 50% of reported incidents were attributed to sexual activity. To our knowledge, this is the only study focusing on long-term outcomes after penile strangulation. This review provides a summary of 56 studies that document penile strangulation injuries over the last 20 years. Although a wide array of penile strangulation injuries have been documented in the literature, reports lack secondary management and long-term outcomes after removal of the strangulation device. We recommend that providers report long-term penile strangulation outcomes for future urologic evaluations after extrication.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7429,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"American Journal of Men's Health\",\"volume\":\"18 1\",\"pages\":\"15579883231223366\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10832435/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"American Journal of Men's Health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/15579883231223366\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Men's Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/15579883231223366","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

有关阴茎勒伤和解救方法的病例报告不胜枚举,但有关阴茎勒伤的护理和长期后果的报告却很少。我们的目的是调查阴茎勒伤后的长期后果和后遗症。我们在 PubMed Medline 数据库中以 "阴茎勒伤"、"阴茎勒伤 "和 "收缩 "为关键词,搜索了所有报道已发表的阴茎勒伤结果的研究。对文章进行了评估,包括勒伤后的随访、勒伤剂、解救剂和损伤后遗症。最终,56 项研究报告了 2000 年 1 月至 2019 年 12 月期间的 100 例阴茎勒伤和解救病例。患者平均年龄为 41 岁(范围:3-86 岁)。24例(24/100)报告了解救后的后遗症。随访时间从 2 周到 7 年不等,中位随访时间为 7 到 12 个月。金属环占勒死因素的 36%(36/100),50% 的报告事件归因于性活动。据我们所知,这是唯一一项关注阴茎勒死后长期结果的研究。本综述总结了过去 20 年中记录阴茎勒伤的 56 项研究。虽然文献中记录了大量阴茎勒伤的情况,但缺乏移除勒伤装置后的二次处理和长期疗效的报告。我们建议医疗服务提供者在今后的泌尿科评估中报告阴茎勒伤在解救后的长期疗效。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Penile Strangulation: Analysis of Postextrication Follow-Up, Sequelae, and a Review of Literature.

Numerous case reports exist on penile strangulation injuries and extrication methods; however, the care and long-term consequences of penile strangulation injuries have been under-reported. Our aim is to investigate the long-term outcomes and sequalae following penile strangulation injuries. The PubMed Medline database was searched using the keyword string "penile strangulation," "penis strangulation," and "constriction" for all studies reporting outcomes of published penile strangulation injuries. Articles were evaluated for follow-up after strangulation injury, strangulating agent, extricating agent, and sequelae of injury. Fifty-six studies resulted with reports of 100 cases of penile strangulation and extrication from January 2000 to December 2019. The mean patient age was 41 (range: 3-86) years. Twenty-four (24/100) cases reported sequalae following extrication. Follow-up ranged from 2 weeks to 7 years with median follow-up time in the 7- to 12-month grouping. Metal rings comprised 36% (36/100) of strangulation agents and 50% of reported incidents were attributed to sexual activity. To our knowledge, this is the only study focusing on long-term outcomes after penile strangulation. This review provides a summary of 56 studies that document penile strangulation injuries over the last 20 years. Although a wide array of penile strangulation injuries have been documented in the literature, reports lack secondary management and long-term outcomes after removal of the strangulation device. We recommend that providers report long-term penile strangulation outcomes for future urologic evaluations after extrication.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
American Journal of Men's Health
American Journal of Men's Health PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
4.30%
发文量
107
审稿时长
15 weeks
期刊介绍: American Journal of Men"s Health will be a core resource for cutting-edge information regarding men"s health and illness. The Journal will publish papers from all health, behavioral and social disciplines, including but not limited to medicine, nursing, allied health, public health, health psychology/behavioral medicine, and medical sociology and anthropology.
期刊最新文献
Late-Onset Familial Systemic Lupus Erythematosus With Lupus Nephritis in an 82-Year-Old Male: A Case Report and Literature Review. Bioinformatics Combined With Experimental Modeling to Study the Molecular Mechanism of Xuefu Zhuyu Decoction to Improve Erectile Dysfunction Associated With Asthma in Rats. Guijiajiao-Lujiaojiao Synergistically Promote Spermatogenesis in Tripterygium Wilfordii Polyglycoside-Induced Oligoasthenozoospermia Rats via PI3K/AKT Signaling Pathway. SPC25 Activates the Warburg Effect to Inhibit Ferroptosis in Prostate Cancer Cells. "A Man Has to Show That He Is a Man From a Young Age": Intimate Partner Violence for Young Male University Students in Brazil.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1